by: Master Jack - Oct 12
2 Comments
by: johnalive - Oct 11
by: Dirty D - Oct 11
2 Comments
by: dr anonymous - Oct 11
2 Comments
by: jsq - Oct 11
by: danps - Oct 11
1 Comments
by: pacer521 - Oct 10
Donna Edwards Thanks OpenLeft
Russ Feingold on the New FISA Legislation
Jon Conyers on Impeachment
Al Franken Thanks Blue Majority
FCC Commissioner Michael Copps on Pearl Jam, Net Neutrality
Darcy Burner on the FISA Legislation
The Discourse of "Terrorism" - Thinking The Unthinkable
by: Paul Rosenberg
Sun Oct 12, 2008 at 09:42
"Now we're all sons of bitches." -- Ken Bainbridge, test director, first atomic bomb test, Los Alamos, New Mexico, July 16, 1945.
It may seem like a minor point at best, a moral abomination at worst, but it bears saying, nonetheless: The labeling of William Ayers as "a domestic terrorist" in the 1970s is a debatable point at best. This is not to defend his choices at the time. It is, rather, to insist, ala George Orwell, on the importance of preserving accurate language, for without it, our collective capacity to tell and know the truth disappears.
Furthermore, one could just as well argue that John McCain was "a state terrorist" for his role in the Vietnam War. But that, of course, is politically unthinkable. Making some things unthinkable, and other things unquestionable is what "democratic" authoritarianism is all about.
There is nothing new in this. In a democracy, the people are responsible for the actions of their government. When our government drops atomic bombs on large Japanese cities, we are all terrorists to some degree. So, too, when we drop napalm on small Vietnamese villages, or when our tax-supported allies kill nuns in El Salvador, or arm religious fanatics in Afghanistan. Terrorism, like suburbia, became a way of life during the Cold War. No wonder we need a scapegoat, into whom all our guilt and self-loathing can pass.
I spent this beautiful crisp afternoon canvassing in Sammamish for the Obama-Gregoire-Burner coordinated campaign. Sammamish is a wealthy suburban area full of software types, progressive but with strong bias towards sprawl. For instance, one woman told me she's voting for Obama and Burner but doesn't like Gregoire because Gregoire doesn't want to address transportation problems by widening the highways as much as Rossi does. There are many wealthy immigrants, and a lot of Obama voters who are undecided about the lower ticket races.
The main takeaway from talking to lots of random voters is that basically no one is paying attention to the Congressional race.
Obama +13.8%: Battleground state (PA)
Obama +10.4%: Battleground state (NH)
Obama +10.0%: Battleground state (NJ)
Obama +9.5%: Battleground state (IA)
Obama +9.0%: Battleground state (OR)
Obama +8.2%: Battleground state (MN)
Obama +8.2%: Battleground state (MI)
Obama +8.8%: Battleground state (WI)
Obama +7.3%: Battleground state (NM)
McCain +6.8%: Leaning Republican (GA)
Obama +5.1%: Battleground state (VA)
Obama +4.0%: Battleground state (CO)
McCain +3.8%: Leaning Republican (IN)
Obama +3.5%: Battleground state (OH)
Obama +3.1%: Battleground state (FL)
Obama +3.0%: Battleground state (NV)
McCain +2.2%: Leaning Republican (WV)
Notice anything wrong with this list? Could it perhaps be that any state where McCain leads, no matter his margin, is defined as "Leaning Republican?" Could it be that states where Obama leads by 7.3%-13.8% are defined as "battleground states," while states where McCain leads by 2.2%-6.8% are defined as "leaning Republican." Does the uneven math in this strike anyone as problematic?
The Washington Post claims that a 2.2% lead for McCain is larger than a 13.8% lead for Obama. That is objectively wrong and quantifiably unfair. This is as blatantly imbalanced as election reporting can possibly get. For more on this, see my related post on the persistent inability for big media to admit that Obama is over 270 electoral votes, no matter what polling indicates.
California's electorate is significantly whiter, older, wealthier, and more educated than the population at large. "As its population has become more diverse, its voters have become less representative of that population," the report, notes. "And the difference between voters and nonvoters is especially stark in attitudes toward government's role; elected officials; and many social issues, policies, and programs."
For example:
• Governor Schwarzenegger's reelection chances would plummet. In May 2006, non-voters disapproved far more sharply (61-21 percent) than likely voters (48-42 percent).
• The $3 billion affordable housing bond (Prop 1C) could easily pass: 80 percent of nonvoters support it, versus 49 percent of likely voters in a May poll.
• California could have bigger government and higher taxes: Nonvoters prefer higher taxes/more services to lower taxes/fewer services by a 66-26 percent margin, compared to 49-44 percent among voters.
The correlations revealed in the report reflect larger relationships observed across time and geographical boundaries. A 2001 paper from the Brookings Institute, "Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?" found a direct correlation between welfare state spending and the size of minority populations-the more minorities, the lower the levels of spending. This held true both internationally (comparing more then 60 different countries) and nationally (comparing all 50 states).
The broader pattern this report fit into strongtly indicates that similar sorts of results would be found all across America: if non-voters became voters, the political status quo could change dramatically. That's the number one reason that GOP hates and fears ACORN and Project Vote.
Attention Wingnuttia - About Those Fannie/Freddie Attacks...
by: David Sirota
Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 17:21
Federal housing data reveal that the charges aren't true, and that the private sector, not the government or government-backed companies, was behind the soaring subprime lending at the core of the crisis.
Facts are persistent things, aren't they? (h/t Atrios)
Update (Chris): The McCain campaign has joined in the conservative claim that the financial crisis was caused by banks being bullied by the diversity policie into giving loans to minorities. From the McCain campaign website:
Conservatives claim that diversity caused the financial crisis. John McCain agress. It ain't just the crowds at McCain events, people.
Bill Moyers Journal: The Good And The Not-So-Good (Pt 2--The Not So Good)
by: Paul Rosenberg
Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 17:00
As I noted in that first diary, Jamieson actually does some very good work, and is sometimes extremely sharp. But this time, not so much, as she showed her more conventional, intellectually lazy, sloppy side, and her addiction to the "balance" narrative, equating the McCain campaign's William Ayers attack ad with Barack Obama's Keating 5 web video.
In a wave year, it's nice that progressives are going to be sitting in Congress next year.
The current projection shows a net Democratic gain of 17-25 seats, making it my best forecast for Democrats yet this cycle. This projection suggests a Democratic Congress of anywhere between D 253-183 R to D 261-175 R. Here are the category changes since October 7th:
AZ-01 upgraded to "Lean Dem" from "Toss-up"
AZ-03 upgraded to "Lean Rep" from "Likely Rep"
FL-16 upgraded to "Likely Rep" from "Toss-up"
FL-21 downgraded to "Toss-up" from "Lean Dem"
FL-25 upgraded to "Toss-up" from "Lean Rep"
MI-07 upgraded to "Lean Dem" from "Toss-up"
MI-09 upgraded to "Lean Dem" from "Toss-up"
MO-09 upgraded to "Toss-up" from "Lean Rep"
NE-02 upgraded to "Likely Rep" from "uncompetitive"
VA-05 upgraded to "Lean Rep" from "Likely Rep"
In 2006, I underestimated Democratic net gains because I forecasted 2-3 Democratic losses. I am starting to wonder if I am making the same mistake this time. Right now, I forecast Democrats losing 4-7 seats, but that is starting to feel awfully high. When this is all said and done, Democrats have a very good chance of winning as many seats as they did in 2006 (30), and acquiring the 100 seat majority Kos has talked about.
Over the next week, as my schedule clears up a bit, I will be re-introducing several activism campaigns targeted at House and Senate races. This is the election where we need to mop up as many seats as possible, and build an overwhelming majority that can govern for a long, long time.
Bill Moyers Journal: The Good And The Not-So-Good (Pt 1--The Good)
by: Paul Rosenberg
Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 14:15
Then in the second half, we saw his bad side. Not the worst, by any means, but the worst in terms of regular features, which is to say, Kathleen Hall Jamieson and her drum-beat "balanced" criticism of the presidential campaign. Jamieson actually does some very good work, and is sometimes extremely sharp. But she also gets lazy, sloppy and/or thoughtlessly conventional at times, and that was certainly the case last night. I'll deal with her segment in a second, briefer diary. But for now, I want to look at the good--not perfect, not spectacular, but definitely quite good side of what Moyers had to offer last night.
It's not really that amazing. But it's clearly stated, and it comes from a guy who's as rich as sin, so calling him a DFH just rolls off his back like water off a duck.
Today's five tracking poll numbers are in and show that Barack Obama has widened his lead to 8.3 points:

You can final the individual poll numbers in Quick Hits. After four days just under 50 percent, Obama made a significant move upward today.
In addition to this measure, the Real Clear Politics average shows a 7.6 Obama lead and the Pollster trend estimates have a spread of 8.5 points in favor of Obama. While the Presidential race isn't over, attention is increasingly turning to House, Senate and other local races. If you have any money left after the market crash and want to get better democrats elected, here is the link.
ACORN: Bogus "Voter Fraud Charges" Aim to Camouflage Voter Suppression
by: Paul Rosenberg
Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 11:32
Increasingly, throughout the 2000s, ACORN and Project Vote have been on the forefront of the struggle to push back voter suppression, and give full voice to those routinely sidelined from participation in our democracy. I'm planning to post a longer diary of my own later this weekend, but to kick things off, I'm posting this diary, primarily composed of a press release from ACORN setting the record straight about just what is going on in the struggle for democracy here at home today.
The financial crisis has dug in its heels and Treasury's plan to buy up troubled assets hasn't been able to dislodge them. There have been numerous reports that the crisis has spread outward from Wall Street to afflict auto dealerships and the commercial paper that businesses and public institutions use to meet payroll. But when The New York Times reported last week that cities, states, and local governments are having difficulty in bond markets - stoking fears that infrastructure projects, services, and payrolls will have to be canceled or scaled back - MayorTV decided to set off to several cities to ask mayors how the financial downturn is affecting them.
Our first stop was Stamford, Connecticut where Mayor Dannel Malloy was anything but optimistic about the economy.
TRUTH: This was never in doubt. The governor can fire the public safety commissioner for any reason at all, or for no reason at all. Pretending that this is the issue is just a typical GOP lie.
McCain-Palin:
TRUTH: The Legislative Council voted 12-0 to release the report. Republicans control the council, 8-4. The report was authorized well before Palin became McCain's VP choice, and she publicly pledged to cooperate at least 13 times, including twice evan after being named as McCain's running mate, before abruptly changing her position. For example, McCain-Palin Press Release, August 30:
McCain-Palin:
TRUTH: Not according to the Branchflower report (PDF, RTF ZIP):

Senate Forecast
House Forecast
OpenLeft in your inbox!
Tips
McCain
John McCain

![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openleft.com%2Fupload%2Fal.gif)