My MacBook Pro Sucks
September 10th, 2006 Filed in: Reviews, Mac Jump to commentsI recently bought a new MacBook Pro (my first Apple computer). Yes, I am one of the switchers. I have been a PC user for a while until Apple introduced Intel-based Mac notebook. I was tempted by the MacBook Pro and brought a 15.4-inch display, 2.16GHz Intel Core Duo, with 2GB of RAM (upgraded from 1GB). After couple hours of fun playing around with the Mac OS X, I installed Adobe CS2 and did couple test runs. I was so disappointed on its performance. It even runs slower than my old PC laptop (1.5GHz Centrino with 1GB RAM). That is impossible since the new MacBook has 2.16GHz CPU with 2GB of RAM. I thought it could be my Adobe software issue. So I went to install Macromedia Studio 8 to see how it perform. Same result - slow.
I got frustrated and did a quick search on Google. I found this review from MacWorld. Apparently, neither Adobe CS2 nor Macromedia Studio 8 supports Intel-based Macs (running on Rosetta) yet. Fortunately, Adobe has announced that they will fix this issue to support Intel-based Mac computers in the next versions. So, if you are planning to get a MacBook Pro as your work computer, you’ll be better off waiting until Adobe release the next version of Creative Suite.
Note: Universal application like Safari, iLife and Mail are running fine and smoothy on my MacBook.
Update
June 6, 2007
I’m now using Adobe CS3 on my MacBook and they run very nice. However, I still have problem with the heat issues (extremely hot when charging). I heard the second generation released in Oct 2006 is faster than my first generation and the heat issue is resolved.
December 19th, 2007 at 4:52 am
I have MacBook (2.2GHz per core) with two gb’s ram… And CS3 installed..
So i can say of this combo - this perfect! Photoshop CS3 starts for 5 srconds. Flash CS3 starts for ten seconds. and Dreamweaver starts for 7 seonds.
Oh, eah… I have OS X Tiger on board.
So i know Leopard is not fully coded… Use Tiger.
November 28th, 2007 at 4:35 am
CS3 + macbook pro is a great combo.
November 25th, 2007 at 12:55 am
I have two suggestions to a hot MacBook Pro:
Lapinator keeps you lap cool:
http://www.amazon.com/Lapinator-Portable-Insulated-Laptop-Desk/dp/B0002Z2R0E/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1195966466&sr=8-1
Fan control turns the fan up to keep the CPU cool:
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/23137
November 19th, 2007 at 5:19 am
I was just going to buy Mac pro these days! but after reading your review I changed my mind!
Can you advice me on a better laptop?
thanks for the review
November 19th, 2007 at 5:17 am
Thanks for clearing that up John. I’m on the designer side of computers not on the engineering or technical side so I appreciate the comment. Isn’t IBM the company that created the first pc? was that a motorola chip then?
November 15th, 2007 at 11:37 am
As long as you get CS3 than you will have ABSOLUTELY NO PROBLEMS! The problem that he addressed was fixed in CS3, and now the Mac (2.2 Ghz w/ 2 GB ram) version blows my PC version away (3.1 GHz GATEWAY w/ 4 GB ram)
November 8th, 2007 at 3:19 pm
I was just going to buy Mac pro these days! but after reading your review I changed my mind!
Can you advice me on a better laptop?
thanks for the review
November 3rd, 2007 at 4:48 am
Macs run faster than PCs. The reason is because CS 2 is running on emulation on macs. Try CS3 which runs natively. You should get blazing speeds.
October 5th, 2007 at 11:02 am
Kansaibear, you remind me of someone who believes in creationism and how obviously the world is only a few thousand years old. I can assure the passing reader that the facts present by Mr. Bear are heavily and unfairly swayed similarly as to the loss of a man’s pet dog.
The Intel architecture as inefficient as it once was in the days when x68 was really the full extent of the CPU’s command set, has come leaps and bounds and far excels that of the now deceased processors iBear so sorely misses. In fact, the obvious error in the argument relates to clock speeds, one might notice that Core 2 Duo is actually slower than the now antiquated P4’s and M’s. The Dual core element is not the sole reason either, it is in fact simply better design teamed with equally better fabrication processes.
The reality being, since Apple have started to use Intel kit, the Mac is suddenly more appealing to the average Joe, and you know why - it’s not the promise of a ‘more productive’ OS, it’s because they want the build quality and sexy design. Underneath the bonnet of what was once a whole different world lies essentially A PC!
Some food for thought, please digest.
Ben
September 19th, 2007 at 8:53 pm
I too am so incredibly disappointed in my macbook pro. It is slow as a turtle. It struggles and agonizes over the simplest tasks. I returned to mac after a pc hiatus of several years due to work specs. Deciding it was time to get all new gear, I read glowing reviews, and spent the dough. Silly me, it wasn’t until I had bought it and installed all the expensive new programs I had been longing for that I realized it was the blogs I should have been reading, and not the reviews. The blogs tell the true sad tale. CS2 is maddening and the Auto FX programs that are supposed to work as photoshop plugins crash. The only program that works well and quickly on my macbook pro is filemaker pro.