Thursday, June 26, 2008

Culture Clash


After experiencing the Lakeland Outpouring in person for the first time earlier this week, I returned home feeling like I’d just swum in a pool filled with oil and water. Every move of God involves a clash of elements: sin vs. salvation, flesh vs. spirit, pride vs. repentance … the list goes on. Yet I believe God’s current movement in Lakeland is exposing the mixed elements that have comprised the charismatic church culture for at least a generation now. The good news? Something’s gotta give. And my hope is that, like water yielding to oil, we’re the ones who make room for God.

Monday night’s apostolic commissioning of evangelist Todd Bentley began with the ceremony’s organizer, Peter Wagner, calling it “an event [that] could well have historic implications not only for the Lakeland Outpouring, but also for our nation and for many other nations of the world.†Those opening remarks set the stage for what simultaneously became an admirable display of ministerial government and a nauseating example of what’s wrong with our movement today.

One minute we were being reminded—as has been the case throughout the Outpouring—that this was all about God’s glory, that it had little to do with Todd Bentley. The next, Bentley was announcing to GOD TV viewers and those among the crowd of 10,000 what cities Todd Bentley would be visiting and what stadiums Todd Bentley would be filling in the months to come. One moment the emphasis was being placed on how revival fires would spread through average, uncommissioned Joes; the next moment, we were presumptuously instructed to “hold our applause until the end†of Wagner’s roll call of the big names in attendance.

I, like most people, am all for God showing up through unconventional means. I love it when He surprises some of us and offends the rest by using the underdogs, the oft-forgottens, the unimpressive and the downright weird among us. It comes as no surprise to me that God might use a sold-out, tattooed, pierced 30-something to stir hunger among His people. And above all the distractions, criticism and controversy surrounding the Lakeland Outpouring, this is clear: God’s people are hungry. Starving, to be exact. We are all—leaders included—desperate for God’s glory to change this earth and bring His kingdom. That, along with such elements as repentance and holiness, lays the foundation for true revival.

But I wonder how firm our foundation currently is given the celebrity-centric ministry culture we’ve created. We cry out for a move of God that’s pronounced through nameless, faceless people, yet we’re all too often reminded of who’s sitting on stage, who’s in the building, who’s holding the microphone, who’s attending what conference, who’s leading worship, who’s prophesying at the church across town …

Is anyone else seeing a culture clash here?

There are obviously other issues—from extra-biblical theology to extreme manifestations to teachings on angels—that have turned the Lakeland Outpouring into such a divisive move. But I believe underneath these fundamental yet surface issues lies a cultural war that is apparent not just every night at the “revival tent†in Lakeland, but also in Spirit-filled churches across our nation. God is looking to promote His kingdom culture, and we keep diluting it with ours.

What’s exciting is that we are all in this together. Ché Ahn, who helped preside over Bentley’s commissioning, spoke the following night in Bentley’s absence and at times gave a beautiful example of what great leadership can look like in these messy times. At the point where most well-known ministers would begin to inadvertently “hog the mic†as they lay hands on the sick and keep all eyes on them, Ahn followed what I believe is God’s underlying desire: letting the saints do His business. Not an elite few or just those who have obvious giftings, mind you. “This is the day of the saints,†Ahn said as he led almost 10,000 “average Joes†to lay hands on the sick among them and pray for each other. “This is something for all of us to do. … Not all of us have the gift of healing, but all of us have the responsibility or the role to heal the sick. … We all carry the anointing!â€

I refuse to be an armchair quarterback of what’s going on at Lakeland, or of any of the leaders involved, for that matter. I am just as at fault for creating this culture as the next person—and that includes the honorable and gifted “names†that I’m targeting here. Again, we all want the same thing. We all want to see God changing lives, communities, cities, nations. We want to see the day when the “glory of God fills the whole earth†(Num. 14:20).

But like the Israelites wandering in Sinai, we can either make another trip around the mountain, or we can change and enter into the promised land of true revival. We can learn from past mistakes and fizzled revivals and be truly saturated with the Holy Spirit, or we can remain a diluted mixture of flesh and spirit. We can continue to shine the spotlight (even unintentionally) on ourselves, or we can truly follow Jesus’ example and become servant leaders who have no problem stepping aside as the Lord walks into the room. It’s God’s culture or our own.

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Please Stay With Me to the End of This Sentence

The latest issue of Atlantic Monthly includes a fascinating article that asks, "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" Beyond just covering the changes since the "information highway" entered our everyday existence, writer Nicholas Carr wonders what affect the Internet is having on our brains—more specifically, how we read and process information. Some highlights from Carr's piece:

Over the past few years I’ve had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory. My mind isn’t going—so far as I can tell—but it’s changing. I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle.

... And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation. My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles. Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.

I highly recommend that you spend a few minutes reading the article. It's not stuffy or overly techy, but is a must-read for anyone who deals with people in this twittering, texting, terabytes-per-second-consuming wiki-culture. (Yep, that means everyone.) The ironic thing, however, is that if you're like me, you probably won't read every word of it. You'll glean through paragraphs, taking only the most outstanding info that catches your eye. And that, folks, is exactly the point.

Reading has changed. Media and our interaction with it have changed. But more importantly, our entire approach to communication has changed. And as a pastor, that affects absolutely everything you do in your approach to people. Yes, the gospel remains the same. The principles of God haven't changed. But just as Christ spoke to both His disciples and the masses using stories, analogies and language of the day, we must communicate with the same timeliness, the same relevant connective tissue. I'm not talking about technology, though that's a major part of it. What I'm referring to is having at least an awareness of the light-speed pace at which people interact with you now and "consume" your message—both spoken and unspoken. Once you get that part down, you'll notice a difference in how you craft a sermon, make announcements, counsel a couple, or even how you have a simple conversation with the Starbucks girl who makes your coffee each morning.

When it comes to communication, it's a different world. So how has this affected you?

Friday, June 06, 2008

Seeking to Blame

The latest from the story that won't die ...

Last August, after assessing the results of an extensive survey of his church, Willow Creek Community Church's Bill Hybels uttered a four-word sentence—"We made a mistake"—that spawned a host of blog posts and news stories, along with a case of rampant "I told you so"-itis. Though Hybels went on to candidly explain Willow's struggles with producing true disciples rather than mere churchgoers (which the survey's results proved), the miscorrelation had already begun: Seeker-sensitive doesn't work! Christianity Today seemed to lead the charge with a blog post in October titled "Willow Creek Repents?" and a follow-up article in May about all the changes the church was supposedly making is response.

I'm not exactly sure why it's taken this long, but Willow finally posted a direct response from Hybels on its Web site today. In the posted video of a Q&A session with Willow Creek Association president Jim Mellado, Hybels called CT's latest story "an unfortunate article that was written without a proper understanding of what we're actually doing these days." And in a loaded response to the blog, he added, "I don't think when you make a strategic adjustment it qualifies under the term 'repent.' I think every evangelical knows that's kind of a loaded-up term, and I think someone wanted to get some action on a blog."

Not too long ago I blogged (also candidly, I might add) about my lack of a definitive opinion on the "seeker-sensitive vs. traditional" debate. Part of our problem, I believe, is that it's not a simple methodology question. Obviously, seeker-sensitive churches aren't in the wrong for reaching out to, as Hybels calls them in the video, the "irreligious" crowd. Any attack on that intent is absurd. Just as absurd, however, is dismissing the assessment that maybe we're not fully allowing the Holy Spirit to move when we program every worship service to be yet another "sit back and enjoy" spiritual ride.

I don't know. I really don't. I'm glad Hybels and Willow Creek are trying to set the record straight, but what might be the bigger issue here is why so many of us seem to want this ministry approach to be proven faulty. I've heard the arguments that a watered-down gospel is no gospel at all. True. But if we're all in the same boat, if we all wake up each morning needing the same daily dosage of God's mercy and grace to cover our failures, that means none of us is the definitive expert on ministry and what it means to fulfill the Great Commission. It means (without stating this too simplistically or couched in excessive naiveté) that we're all trying our best to share the good news of Jesus. So although many of us have a problem with seeker-sensitive worship services being more tightly scripted than some Oscar-winning screenplays, I wonder if by pointing that out we're not harboring a "they've missed the boat" attitude and thus exposing our own—now what did Hybels call it?—mistake.

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

A Falling Nation and a Rising Revival

I've spent enough time working in the newsroom of a local newspaper to know it isn't my cup of tea. Apparently, those are words journalists are never supposed to utter, but hey, I'm just being honest. It didn't take long to figure out what the newsroom environment does to most people. While searching under every rock for the truth, writers morph into cynics as the world and its harsh sadness eats away at every sense and sensibility. Whatever survives is calloused, be it relationships, dreams, perspectives, etc.

I'm hoping that's not the case for veteran journalist Christine Wicker, who recently released her latest book, The Fall of the Evangelical Nation: The Surprising Crisis Inside the Church. A title like that normally wouldn't catch my eye since we've been blitzed by so much evangelicalspeak in recent years. Do we really need another person's take on the rise or fall of evangelicalism, what it means or doesn't mean to this year's presidential election, whether there's a changing of the guard or not—yada yada yada?

Yet Wicker and her latest project piqued my interest mainly because a severely condensed version of her take on evangelicalism's decline showed up in the op-ed section of Sunday's Dallas Morning News. More precisely, she has me interested because of how much her words ruffled me. I'm not easily offended, yet almost every paragraph of her article sparked a response in me—from anger to agreement. Now that's good writing.

Some quotes from Wicker's piece:
The idea that only one little part of one kind of religion has the only way to God has begun to seem more and more unlikely. It has begun to seem rude. Un-Christian, even. And evangelicals, who don't like being boorish any more than anyone else, have become less and less willing to relegate their neighbors to hell. So we have a completely formless god of great power and instant accessibility romping around, rescuing millions whom everyone else had given up on. Then we have more Christians getting squeamish about proclaiming hegemony over heaven.

Evangelical leaders defend their stance by claiming that God doesn't change and that neither does sin. But sin does change. Slavery wasn't sin once. Now it is. Taking a wife and a concubine wasn't sin once. Now it is. And God—or our understanding of what God is, which is all we actually have—changes, too. When societies change, their interpretations of God change. Their readings of the Scripture shift. Human understandings are remolded so that faith can remain vital and effective during new times.

Whether evangelical intransigence is pleasing to God isn't anything that humans can ever be absolutely sure of. If it is pleasing to him, God may send a great revival that will sweep the country and restore them to their place of predominance. Such revivals have happened before. They could happen again.

Wicker comes from Southern Baptist roots, which I mention simply because it indicates to me that she knows exactly what she's doing. She's been immersed in the language and knows she's riling up a major segment of her readers. And yes, I believe her view is extremely skewed toward the Baptist world (again, she's smart enough to consider her Dallas-area audience). But through all her caustic language, I find it strange that her landing point is a question of revival.

We are in odd times, aren't we? And what I love is that God can speak through anyone, anytime, to remind us that He does not nor will not abandon His church. Thankfully, that church isn't the evangelical movement, nor is it the declining denominations. Talk about the declining church is cheap nowadays. According to every expert and analyst, we're becoming ineffective, powerless, scattered, divided, hypocritical and small.

Hogwash. The church is approaching what could be her finest hour. Whenever darkness grows thicker, light doesn't become irrelevant—it becomes brighter. A single pure flame lights up an entire room; think of what thousands or even millions can do. Even if there is only a remnant of "pure" lights left in this falling nation, that's still enough to rest on the assurance that God's people—His church—we are alive and well. Do we need revival? Of course. Does our nation need a radical spirit revolution that reforms our culture? You bet. Yet thankfully, every revival and reformation starts with a single spark. Call me an optimist, but I believe more than a single spark exists today. I believe we have more than just a hope; we have a future, just as God has said.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

How do you rate mobile version of this page?

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser