7:22PM. Update — I just got back from having Chilean margaritas so let me try and answer some of the points made in the comments. Go ahead. Let me have it.
1. Why do I think the rumor about Palin’s 5-month-old baby being her daughter’s is off-limits? It’s not that it’s off-limits, it’s just that there are so many other issues to slam Palin on that are actually verifiable. The woman is wrong on global warming and the environment, knows zero about foreign policy, and I’m not sure she’s heard how bad the economy is. So why continue to bring a baby with a genetic condition into it?
2. What kind of mother is Sarah Palin? I don’t even want to get into a debate about working or stay-at-home moms. It’s every woman’s (and man’s) choice whether or not to go back to work, or cut back on hours, or keep their own names. There are plenty of negatives with Palin that there’s no need to bring up a woman’s place and whose choices are best. That’s what Republicans do.
And to say that the only reason her teenage daughter got pregnant is because her Christian conservative mother is against birth control is insane. Do you know how many teens get pregnant? No, I don’t agree with abstinence-only education. Or stupid kids having irresponsible sex. But it happens. A lot.
3. Yes, Republicans live in glass houses, as is evidenced by the conservatives who are found tapping away in public restrooms. Guess who else lives in glass houses? Everybody.
4. I would rather see Palin being taken apart in the VP debate by Joe Biden because of her inexperience, not because of her maternal instincts. This is only the second time a woman has been put on the ticket. I don’t want to see her completely destroyed. I want to see her lose, fair and square, not because of what kind of mother we think she is, but because of what kind of VP she would make.
5. Yes, the story is crazy and could get even crazier. But it leaves a bad taste in my mouth either way. Or maybe that’s the booze.
***
The rumors about Sarah Palin were kind of sort of true but not really. Her 17-year-old daughter Bristol is, in fact, pregnant. But Sarah’s five-month-old baby Trig is, in fact, Sarah’s. There was no cover up like there was with, say, Nicole Kidman.
The McCain campaign released a statement in order to dispel the “despicable Internet rumors” that had circulated throughout the Kosikazi Parallel Universe, saying that McCain knew about Bristol before asking the Governor to be on the ticket.
Now, before we all start drinking (too late), toasting our good fortune, think of how this could play in battleground states like Ohio and Pennsylvania. Sarah was picked, in part, to appeal to the blue-collar Reagan Democrats who supported Hillary during the primary.
Why, they could be like any other family. Here’s the Palin statement:
“We have been blessed with five wonderful children who we love with all our heart and mean everything to us. Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support.
“Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realize very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family.”
So Sarah’s daughter gets pregnant, doesn’t have an abortion, keeps the child and marries the father.
This could go one of two ways: torpedo the McCain campaign once and for all, or keep people (and the press) interested in Sarah Palin, which could help or hurt. Don’t forget that the South has the highest teen birth rates, along with swing states New Mexico, Colorado, and Indiana.
VPs! They’re just like us!
(One last thought: With all the talk about Sarah Palin being a bad mother because she chose to go back to work and run on a national ticket when she should be staying at home with her kids and soon-to-be grandkid… well, do we really want to have that debate with Republicans? Conservatives may believe that women should stay at home, but I’ll be damned if that’s where our party is going. Unless we think that fathers aren’t capable of rearing their children.)