Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

Do Not Swear at All (Matthew 5.33­–37)

Thursday, October 2nd, 2008
(This post was originally written in 2005.)
 
Did President George W. Bush disobey Jesus Christ at his inauguration this past Thursday?
 
According to Matthew 5.33–37, Jesus said, “Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but keep the oaths you have made to the Lord.’ But I tell you, Do not swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. Simply let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.”
 
On Thursday, Chief Justice William Rehnquist led President Bush in reciting the presidential oath of office: “I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Like every president since George Washington, Bush concluded his recitation with four little words: “So help me God.”
 
Jesus said not to swear at all. Bush swore an oath of office. Jesus said not to swear by anything. Bush swore by God’s help. So he disobeyed Jesus’ direct commandments, right?
 
You might be surprised to learn that throughout the history of the church, rigorist Christian groups have concluded that swearing oaths is in fact a sin. During the 16th Century Protestant Reformation, for example, a number of radical reformers prohibited their followers from swearing oaths in court and swearing oaths of office.
 
The mainstream reformers rejected this legalistic understanding of Jesus’ words, however, and for a simple reason: Jesus himself swore an oath under God! In Matthew 26.63–64, we read: “The high priest said to him, ‘I charge you under oath by the living God: Tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God.’ ‘Yes, it is as you say,’ Jesus replied.” Unless we are willing to charge Jesus with obeying himself, we should probably not charge President Bush with doing so.
 
This conclusion should be obvious. It is common sense. So why did Jesus use such extreme language? What precisely was his point? Simply this: We should be men and women of our words.
 
Look at what Jesus said in Matthew 23.18: “Woe to you, blind guides! You say, ‘If anyone swears by the temple, it means nothing; but if anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by his oath.” The “blind guides” were “teachers of the law and Pharisees” (23.13). They generated legalistic distinctions so that a person could swear an oath without really meaning to abide by it. For Jesus, this legalism was demonic. For Jesus, yes was yes and no was no. Period. And he expected such integrity of speech from those of us who follow him, whether we’re plumbers or presidents of the United States.

Until Heaven and Earth Pass Away (Matthew 5.18)

Thursday, September 11th, 2008



According to Jewish rabbis, Moses’ Law contains 611 commandments. These commandments regulate every aspect of human life: spirituality, morality, calendar, dress, and even diet. Are Christians obligated to obey each and every one of them?

In Matthew 5.18–19, Jesus seems to answer yes, “I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.”

And yet, we know from a variety of passages in the New Testament that Christians are not required to keep all the commandments. Whereas Old Testament believers were commanded to circumcise male infants (Gen. 17.11, Lev. 12.3), for example, New Testament believers are not (Gal. 5.6). Whereas certain foods were considered “unclean” by Old Testament believers (Lev. 11.1–47), all foods are considered “clean” by New Testament believers (Mark 7.19, Acts 10,9–23). And while the Israelites kept the Sabbath, or seventh day, as a day of rest (Ex. 20.8–11), Christians worship God on the Lord’s Day, i.e. Sunday (Acts 20.7, 1 Cor. 16.2, Col. 2.16–17).

How do we resolve this apparent discrepancy between the teaching of Jesus and the practice of his disciples? There is no other way than by paying close attention to what Jesus actually said. Focus your attention on Matthew 5.17: ““I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.”

At first glance, Jesus seems to be teaching that even the smallest Old Testament laws will always remain in force. But a second look shows that he attaches two conditions to the permanence of the Law: “until heaven and earth disappear” and “until everything is accomplished.” Both of these phrases reappear in Matthew 24.34–35, where Jesus says, “I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.”

To Jesus’ way of thinking, “heaven and earth” describe the way things currently are. But “the kingdom of God/heaven” describes the way things should be. That is why the essence of his gospel is, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near” (Matt. 4.17). When the kingdom of God comes, heaven and earth begin to pass away, and God brings about a new reality. Paul calls this “the new creation” (2 Cor. 5.17). John calls it “a new heaven and a new earth” (Rev. 21.1). Moses’ Law is part of “heaven and earth,” impermanent regulations for an impermanent reality.

The Permanent Reality is Jesus Christ, whose Permanent Regulations “will never pass away.”

Not to Abolish but to Fulfill (Matthew 5:17)

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008
Jesus was an observant Jew. The Law of Moses shaped his life, regulating his spirituality, morality, calendar, and even diet. And yet, he practiced Judaism in such a way that some thought he intended to abolish that very same law.

For example, according to Matthew 12.1–14, certain Pharisees criticized Jesus for allowing his hungry disciples to pick small heads of grain on the Sabbath and for healing a man with a shriveled hand. They interpreted both actions as violations of the prohibition of work on the Sabbath. Jesus responded to their criticism by refuting their misreading of the law. But his response so angered them that they “plotted how they might kill Jesus.”

No wonder, then, Jesus felt it necessary to declare his intentions regarding the law. “Do not think,” he proclaimed, “that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them” (Matt. 5.17). What did Jesus’ words mean to his original hearers? And what do they mean to us?

To abolish the law meant to annul it or to set it aside. The Pharisees believed Jesus was annulling the Sabbath law by allowing his disciples to work on the Sabbath, or by working himself. Obviously, Jesus did not interpret his actions in the same way. He did not believe he was abolishing the law.

But what did he mean by saying that he fulfilled the law? Matthew uses the word “fulfill” sixteen times. Twelve of those times refer to how Jesus fulfilled various Old Testament prophecies (1.22; 2.15, 17, 23; 4.14; 8.17; 12.17; 13.35; 21.3; 26.54; 26.56; 27.9). That is the most likely meaning of the verb here. Jesus is saying that he fulfills Scripture (“the Law or the Prophets”). The entire Old Testament is, as it were, a prophecy about him.

Luke 24.27 makes this point explicit by relating a conversation between Jesus and two of his disciples: “And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, he explained to them what was said in all the Scriptures concerning himself.” As St. Augustine puts it, “The New Testament is in the Old Testament concealed, the Old Testament is in the New Testament revealed.” And Jesus is the Revealer.

But what does Matthew 5.17 mean for us? If Jesus did not abolish the Law of Moses, are we Christians required to obey it? Yes and no. I will try to explain these answers in subsequent devotionals, but for now, I want to focus on a different question: Do you read the Old Testament?

I ask this because in my experience, too many Christians ignore the Law and the Prophets, which seem to be filled with what one British writer called “bore, gore, and folklore.” And yet, if Jesus fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures, to ignore them is to ignore him. A bumper sticker proclaims, “Jesus is the answer.” But without the Old Testament, we don’t even know what the question is. Let’s read it and find out!

Blessed Are the Poor in Spirit

Monday, August 4th, 2008
“When you hit rock bottom, you’ve got two ways to go,” according to country music star Wynonna Judd: “straight up and sideways.”[1]I don’t normally draw theological inspiration from country music, but Wynonna’s lyrics struck a chord within me (so to speak). Life can be very hard, but we always have choices.
 
The Sermon on the Mount begins with this beatitude: “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 5.3). A similar beatitude appears in Luke: “Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God” (6.20). Commentators argue over the differences between the two. Are the “poor in spirit” identical to the “poor”? Is the “kingdom of heaven” the same as the “kingdom of God”? I am inclined to answer “yes” to both questions. Today, I’ll focus on what it means to be “poor in spirit”/”poor.” Tomorrow, I’ll look at the meaning of the “kingdom of heaven/God.”
 
So, what does it mean to be “poor in spirit”/”poor”? The Greek for “poor” is ptoxos. According to Robert Guelich, this word has “an exclusively socioeconomic meaning” in extrabiblical Greek literature. But the Jews expanded its range of meaning when they translated the Old Testament from Hebrew into Greek. “[T]he poor in Judaism referred to those in desperate need (socioeconomic element) whose helplessness drove them to a dependent relationship with God (religious element) for the supplying of their needs and vindication.”[2] In other words, the poor are people who have hit rock bottom and are looking up. The difference between Matthew and Luke is a matter of emphasis: Matthew emphasizes the religious element without losing sight of the socioeconomic element; Luke does the reverse.
 
God sent Jesus into the world to minister to the “poor in spirit.” According to Luke 4.16–21, when Jesus preached at his hometown synagogue in Nazareth, he quoted Isaiah 61.1–2a as a prophecy about himself: “The Spirit of the Sovereign Lord is on me, because the Lord has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim freedom for the captives and release from darkness for the prisoners, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” The good news for rock-bottom people is that when they look up, they’re looking at Jesus.
 
Can this beatitude be good news for us? By any standard of measurement, we Americans are not socioeconomically poor. Can we be blessed? That depends on whether we are poor in the religious sense of the term. In the words of the Puritan Thomas Watson, “‘Poor in spirit’ then signifies those who are brought to the sense of their sins, and seeing no goodness in themselves, despair in themselves and sue wholly to the mercy of God in Christ.”[3] We are sinners. Are we looking up to Jesus for salvation?
 
As for me, I’m with Wynonna. “I have seen my share of hard times and I’m letting you know: Straight up is my way.”
 
 




[1] For the complete lyrics of “Rock Bottom,” go here: http://www.wynonna.com/music/lyrics/collections10.htm.
[2] Robert A. Guelich, The Sermon on the Mount: A Foundation for Understanding (Waco, TX: Word, 1982), 68, 69.
[3] Thomas Watson, The Beatitudes (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1971 [reprint of 1660 edition]), 42.

Introduction to the Beatitudes

Friday, August 1st, 2008
In this life, who is truly happy and why?
 
The answer to the first question is obvious. In this life, the healthy, wealthy, and wise are happy, as are the winners, the well known, and the well connected. Why? Isn’t the answer self-evident? Who, after all, wants to be sick, poor, and foolish, or an unknown, socially alienated failure? Such people simply cannot be happy. Right?
 
Not exactly.
 
The Sermon on the Mount begins with nine beatitudes in which Jesus pronounces a blessing on the poor, the mourners, the meek, the hungry and thirsty, the merciful, the pure in heart, the peacemakers, the persecuted, and the insulted (Matt. 5.3–12). It is, all in all, an absurdly counterintuitive list of happy losers. How can such people possibly be happy?
 
The answer most certainly does not lie in their present circumstances, for in each beatitude, the circumstances describe people in dire need. The circumstances of a poor person are defined by what he lacks, whether that lack be of things or “in spirit.” Mourners are, by definition, unhappy. The meek too often live at the mercy of the arrogant. The hungry and thirsty for righteousness do not have what they desire; they are unrighteous sinners. The merciful have been sinned against and must decide whether to extend grace to the ungrateful. If, as Soren Kierkegaard says, “purity of heart is to will one thing,” then none of us can be happy because, as Paul says, “what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do” (Rom. 7.16). Peacemakers live in a world of war, and the persecuted and insulted are victims of religious intolerance and persecution. Present circumstances do not—cannot!—explain the happiness of the people Jesus blesses.
 
But God can.
 
In Greek, the word makarios (“blessed”) has both a subjective and objective connotation. Subjectively, the word describes the inner life of a person, his emotions—his happiness. Objectively, the word describes the positive totality of a person’s circumstances—his fortune. It is possible to be blessed in the latter sense without feeling blessed in the former. Americans, for example, have the good fortune to live in what is arguably the healthiest, wealthiest, and best-educated country the world has ever produced. But far too many Americans are unhappy because they compare their circumstances to those of other Americans, rather than to those of people around the world.
 
According to Jesus, the poor, the mourning, the meek, etc. are fortunate because God is even now beginning to pour blessings into their lives: the kingdom of heaven, comfort, an inheritance, righteousness, mercy, a face-to-face vision of God, and adoption into his family. The total circumstances of such people produce real happiness in their lives because God generously compensates—now and eternally—for the deficiencies they are presently experiencing.
 
So we return to our opening question: Who is truly happy and why? In the words of David Garland, “Happy are the unhappy for God will make them happy.”

It’s Time for Some Campaignin’!

Wednesday, July 16th, 2008
Send a JibJab Sendables® eCard Today!

Eschatology and Missions (Acts 1:6-8)

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008
Have you heard of The Rapture Index?
 
It is a webpage run by two Bible-believing Christians named Todd Strandberg and Terry James. The purpose of the index is “to measure the type of activity that could act as a precursor to the rapture.” It does this by assigning numerical value on a daily basis to news reports about false Christs, war, natural disasters, and famine, among other things. The Rapture Index measured 169 on June 30, 2008. The all-time high for the index was 182 on September 24, 2001. The all-time low was 57 on December 12, 1993.
 
What do these numerical values mean? Here’s how Strandberg and James put it:
 
Rapture Index of 100 and Below: Slow prophetic activity Rapture Index of 100 to 130: Moderate prophetic activity Rapture Index of 130 to 160: Heavy prophetic activity Rapture Index above 160: Fasten your seat belts
 
Evidently, in light of yesterday’s Rapture Index, California’s seat-belt motto has eschatological significance: Click it or ticket!
 
Christians are a future-oriented people. We “look forward to the day of God and speed its coming”; we are “looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness” (2 Pet. 3:12-13). And, of course, Jesus himself told us that certain “signs” would precede the end of the age: “Even so, when you see all these things, you know that it is near, right at the door” (Matt. 24:33). I suppose Jesus’ words are what motivate Strandberg and James to maintain their index.
 
According to Acts 1:6-8, Jesus’ disciples were similarly interested in the timing of end-times events. During the forty days between the Resurrection and the Ascension, Luke tells us: “So when they met together, they asked him, ‘Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel?’” For the disciples, the restoration of Israel’s kingdom was The Big Event, eschatologically speaking. When that happened, the dead would rise, the righteous would be vindicated, and paradise would be restored.
 
Jesus’ reply to his disciples’ question is interesting. “He said to them: ‘It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority. But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.’” God alone knows exactly what the future holds and in what order that future will unfold. We don’t. It’s not our job to figure that stuff out. Rather, our job is to be witnesses of Jesus’ words and deeds to everyone everywhere.
 
Acts 1:8 is the key verse. It describes our priority: missional witness, not eschatological speculation. It demonstrates our need for power from the Holy Spirit. And it delineates a plan of action: from Jerusalem to the ends of the world. Acts tells the story of the church as it carried out its mission in the first-century. It’s our job to do the same in the twenty-first.
 
By the way, the one word you won’t find on the Rapture Index is mission. To me, that’s telling.


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser