
If the reviewers of the Macbook Air are right, then people don't really care about Apple design.
Above is a commercial for an original Pentium, it promises movie quality films, amazing computer graphics and instant number crunching.
A Pentium had around 3 million transistors, 2 year old Intel processors today have 1.7 billion.
You would need six hundred Pentium based computers, in an office the size of a hangar, to equal the processing power of a single Macbook Air that fits in an envelope.
Yet if you would believe what you read, the Macbook Air, is under spec'ed, when the vast majority of professional computer users use exactly the same software as we did when we had Pentiums.
And this opinion, that the Air is under powered, is according to the leading technology journalists in the country, not mad people with tin foil hats.
Pentium's were first made when the applications that people most used were spreadsheets, word processors and presentation software. A tiny minority pf people did things like 3d graphics and high resolution photo retouching.
In fact the most notable new entrant in software, the browser, would potentially reduce client computer requirements.
Today not much has changed, more people do photo retouching but often at lower resolution. More processing is done on servers, and most people still use things like word processors and spreadsheets in similar ways.
In fact the extra demands on computing power are largely for consumer applications, so you could argue that 'professional' computers need something else than computing horse power.
The initial reception of the Macbook Air proves that the current process of designing, marketing and selling computers has nothing to do with 'specification' requirements, but everything to do with specification lust.
If the critics are right, they show that above all that despite Apple's great designs, people don't really care about design, unless its lathered on top of tech prowess.
But what if the problem was with the critics themselves. Perhaps they are out of touch and way too geeky for a world where computers are not sold like self assembly amateur electronics projects.
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here