[image][image][image][image][image][image][image][image]
[image]
[image]
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
[image]
[image][image][image][image][image]
September 7, 2008
[image][image][image][image][image][image][image]
Free E-mail Newsletters:
[image]RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Speaking Out
What Would Jonathan Edwards Say About Harry Potter?
How the preacher responded to pop culture's version of transcendence.



ADVERTISEMENT

[WARNING: SOME PLOT SPOILERS.]

So there we have it. The most engrossing imaginative world created at the start of the 21st century is essentially pagan. Don't get me wrong—I like the Harry Potter series. I've read all of the books. And I'm sure Jonathan Edwards would have done so, too.

Edwards was acutely aware of the cultural movements of his time. He said in "Some Thoughts Concerning the Revival" that he made it his practice to take light from wherever it came. Of course, reading John Locke and the like is not quite like reading books designed (originally) for children.

It's hard to imagine that Edwards would have remained ignorant about what has become such a powerful phenomenon of our time. He immersed himself in the cutting-edge Enlightenment thinking of his age, and his book list and letters reveal a breadth of reading anything but narrow. No doubt Edwards would have mined the Harry Potter series for insights into the predominant spiritual atmosphere in which we live.

Edwards neither ignored nor capitulated to the Enlightenment's materialistic/mechanistic view of life and the universe. Instead he "re-formed" the Enlightenment on specifically biblical terms and constructed intellectual bridges to cultural attitudes, along which the orthodox gospel could more readily transverse.

Or you could imagine his engagement with Enlightenment thinking as sending Trojan horses full of gospel truths into contemporary minds. He carefully used "sense," "idea" and "light"—Enlightenment buzzwords—in sermons and his more erudite works, and he invested those terms with biblical material and content.

The latest and last of Rowling's Potter series (though she leaves it tantalizingly open to sequels, despite her reported refusal to contemplate future work—perhaps not Potter, but maybe a return to Hogwarts?) is all about death. In case the title didn't make that clear ("the Deathly Hallows"), the frontispiece has two quotations referring to death. There is a sense in which the whole seven-volume series has been about death.

Even Dumbledore (beware: spoiler) seems to have tinkered with the less-than-salutary sides of this fascination. Also, there's Voldemort, with his evil determination to avoid death at the cost of others' lives, and Harry, dear Harry, who with his purity and bravery manages to cheat death again and again, even finding himself at one point in a sort of cosmic waiting room with the dead Dumbledore.

What does this tell us, Edwards would have wondered. He would have discovered that we live in an age that is fascinated by the transcendent—and the paranormal—but that, while intrigued, is totally confused about that realm.

Edwards would have seen that the essential question of spirituality—What happens when I die?—is a great vacuum that culture is looking to fill. The series also tells us—and this no less important—that if Rowling's world is expertly reflecting the light our world can shed on these matters, true understanding is at a pretty low level.

That doesn't mean I shouldn't read it. Nor does it mean that Edwards would disapprove of us learning from it (light from wherever it comes), but (borrowing from more recent intellectual heroes like Lewis or Tolkien) it does mean that if the world's imagination is captured by Potter-esque versions of the afterlife and the transcendent—a less-than-Christian way of looking at the world—we have work to do. The imagination is a hairbreadth away from the soul.

I believe Edwards would also look from Potter to us and say, "Who's going to tell a more compelling story that sheds true gospel light on the transcendent?"

Josh Moody (PhD, Cambridge University) is senior pastor of Trinity Baptist Church in Newhaven, CT, associate fellow of Jonathan Edwards College, Yale University, and the author of The God-Centered Life: Insights from Jonathan Edwards for Today.



Related Elsewhere:

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is available from Amazon.com and other retailers.

For more articles on previous Harry Potter books and movies, see our full coverage area.

Christian History and Biography has an issue on Jonathan Edwards.





[image]E-mail this page [image] [image]Write CT [image] [image]Print this article [image] [image]Post a comment



[image]


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders[image]2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
[image]
Average User Rating: [image]

Displaying 1 - 3 of 55 comments. See all comments
Christina R.    Posted: July 26, 2007 10:35 PM
[image]
I am shocked that the editors of Christianity Today would glorify Harry Potter, I am saddened that they would presume what Jonathan Edwards would have to say, I am appalled that they would try to find a connection between the Harry Potter series and the Bible. As a Christian who enjoys reading lots of books, I have learned not to equate God's Word with anyone else's words no matter how popular. Christians have come to justify what they watch or read saying there is a "Bible Lesson" here...Who are you kidding....You enjoy it! The editorials at Christianity today are not "Gospel" they are written by people who have been saved "hopefuly" by the atoning blood of Jesus Christ, a sacrifice that cannot be compared to a fictional story that glorifies the very things that God Warns us about and says is evil. If you want to read it, and write about it, than be responsilbe with your opinoins....and call it what it really is! An adventure that has nothing to do with the Goodness of God.

Jane Gallagher    Posted: August 06, 2007 2:06 PM
[image]
Wow, now I remember why I'm an atheist. This is insane. Both sides of this argument are reading way too much into it.

Beth M    Posted: July 25, 2007 10:32 AM
[image]
Thank you for the informative article. As I am learning to appreciate my liberty in Christ, I understand that great art can be created by artists who are not Christian and who do not create from a decidedly Christian worldview. Why? I now understand that we are ALL created in the image of a creative God, and beauty can and does exist at the hands of those who do not know the truth of the Gospel. That's why I can read and appreciate The Odyssey, and I can sing and enjoy "I Wanna Hold Your Hand." But with that appreciation comes responsibility. Our challenge is twofold: (1) To be able to recognize opposing worldviews so that we are not influenced by them and (2) To raise up a generation of artists who will create lasting works of art from a Christian worldview (think Bach) so that we CREATE the culture rather than repeatedly responding to and imitating it. "Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind." Rom 12:2

[image]
sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search
[image]
[image]

[image]
[image]
[image] [image]


[image]

[image]
[image]
[image]
[image] [image]

[image]
[image] [image]

[image]
[image]
Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:
[image]

[image][image] [image]

[image]
[image] © 2008 Christianity Today International  
About Us | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Customer Care | Advertise with Us | Job Openings | Help  
[image]


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser