Death Knell Sounds for Nullsoft, Winamp

By Nate Mook, BetaNews

November 10, 2004, 1:26 PM

The last members of the original Winamp team have said goodbye to AOL and the door has all but shut on the Nullsoft era, BetaNews has learned.

Only a few employees remain to prop up the once-ubiquitous digital audio player with minor updates, but no further improvements to Winamp are expected.

Winamp's abandonment comes as no surprise to those close to the company who say the software has been on life support since the resignation of Nullsoft founder and Winamp creator Justin Frankel last January.

The marriage of Nullsoft and AOL was always one of discontent. After AOL acquired the small company in 1999 for around $100 million, the young team of Winamp developers was assimilated into a strict corporate culture that begged for rebellion. Although Nullsoft was initially given a long leash by AOL, It wasn't long until the two ideologies collided.

Frankel and his team were accustomed to simply brainstorming ideas over coffee and bringing them to the masses without approval. So when Frankel and fellow Nullsoft developer Tom Pepper devised a decentralized peer-to-peer file sharing system, dubbed Gnutella, parent AOL was left in the dark.

Gnutella was unveiled in March 2000, much to the chagrin of an unprepared AOL; executives feared the program would encourage copyright infringement and damage the company's pending merger with Time Warner. AOL quickly clamped down on Gnutella, but not before the software's source code leaked. Gnutella-based alternatives soon followed, igniting a peer-to-peer land grab that has yet to subside.

But AOL knew it had to protect its investment and turn a profit from the freely available Winamp. Frankel and crew found themselves in hot water numerous times, but always escaped with little more than a proverbial slap on the wrist.

However, growing displeasure reached a boiling point with Nullsoft’s unsanctioned release of WASTE -- an encrypted file-sharing network -- in June 2003. Frankel threatened to resign after AOL removed WASTE, but remained with the company long enough to finish Winamp 5.0.

Frankel's departure followed AOL layoffs and the closure of Nullsoft's San Francisco offices in December 2003.

With AOL struggling to stave off declining subscriber numbers and 700 additional layoffs planned for next month, the company’s focus has shifted away from supporting acquisitions such as Winamp.

Despite the somber farewell, Nullsoft's former masterminds are proud of their accomplishments. Winamp helped start a digital audio revolution and boasts an incredible 60 million users per month.

After a disappointing Winamp3, Nullsoft developers returned to the drawing board and completed long-standing goals with the release of Winamp 5.0 in late 2003.

Nullsoft's Shoutcast, which pioneered audio streaming over the Internet, is called "the Net's best secret" by its creator Tom Pepper and has reached 170,000 simultaneous users accounting for 70 million hours of listening each month.

For its part, AOL says it remains committed to Winamp, stating it is "a thriving product that AOL continues to support and will continue to support."

But without those who poured their heart and soul into building the software, Winamp seems destined to meet a fate similar to fellow audio player Sonique, after Lycos saw the departure of its development team. Sonique has stagnated for years, and development ceased altogether last March.

Add a Comment

BetaNews reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Please keep your responses appropriate and on topic. Foul language and personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Name (required):

E-mail (required):

Enter Your Comment:

By aaaawow

edited Oct 3, 2008 - 11:51 PM

world of warcraft power leveling wow power leveling power leveling runescape gold rs2 gold wow gold ???? ????? ??? oil painting ????? ????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ????? paper cup machine paper cone machine

????? runescape money rs2 money dofus kamas thermoforming Equipment ???? bag making machine ???? ???? butterfly valve ball valve v-port ball valve ???? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ??? ???,?????,???,??? ??? ????? ??? ?????,??????,?????,???????? ????? ?????? ?????,????????,????????,????????? ?????

power leveling wow power leveling ???? paper box making lines rigid paper box making lines paper box making machinery rigid paper box making machinery paper box forming machinery rigid paper box forming machinery rigid paper box equipment paper box equipment thermoforming machine thermoforming Equipment Plastic Machinery Plastic Thermoforming Machine Plastic Thermoforming Machinery Plastic Sheet Unit,Plastic Extruding Machine Plastic Machine prada shoes true religion jeans evisu jeans Ed hardy Gucci shoes Gucci Handbag adidas shoes Ugg Boots nike shoes LV handbags Jordan shoes new era caps

??? ??? ??? ??? ???,?????,???,V??,??? ??? V?? ??? ??? ??? ???? ????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ??? ??? ?????? ???

Score: 0

By altair08

edited May 2, 2008 - 9:48 PM

I have yahoo 8.1 and I have WinAmp and my musics won't go thur the room,Is a problem with it or it just yahoo won't play it in the room???

Score: 0

By skywalker2001

edited Nov 24, 2007 - 7:59 PM

Hey guys!
If more users payed to use this software, perhaps they could start a new company on their own...
How many of you guys actually payed for the software?? I believe that if you use software a lot, you should contribute by purchasing the program.
Sorry to see the team go.
What can I say but THANK YOU FOR HOURS OF ENTERTAINMENT AND FOR MAKING INTERNET HISTORY.
See you soon!
Skywalker2001

Score: 0

By preciousjames

posted Aug 9, 2006 - 5:52 AM

Sorry Winamp... I'm switching to Media Player Classic with Quicktime Alternative: http://www.free-codecs.c...ickTime_Alternative.htm

Thanks for the memories and continued success to the developers!!!

Score: 0

By X-weApon-X

edited Jul 10, 2006 - 1:20 AM

The best actual, Literally FREE Content player was WINAMP version 2.95. This version can be downloaded at http://oldversion.com

Nothing will ever again be as good as WINAMP. Even WinAMP version 3- The version that is taboo to speak of... Is better than any version of Windows Media Player.

Hopefully, now that this program is reverting to The Public Domain, Justin, or maybe some new young developer, will take it over again, take it back from the Ruiniation that AOL has wreaked on our FREE content player... And perhaps he will recover it from the greasy filthy Coporate Slime-Paws of AOL.

Regarding the paid-for versions: My favourite was WinAMP version 5.2. Let's just go over a bit, what WinAMP has done for us in the last 10 years:

An MP3 player. An MP3 Player that could "decompress" a file and turn it back to WAV. An OGG player. An ASF/ASX player. A WMA Converter! An AVI File player... A DivX player, and XviD player. an MPEG player... An MoV player (With certain plugins). And finally, under version 2.95: A full featured Content PLAYER that could play back virtually ANY content from ANY format.

This is what we have lost... So, are we going to resign ourselves to the only content players being Itunes and Windblows Media Destroyer? No way in Hades, Baby: All you developers out there, let's open source this heap: Like Gabest has done with Windows Media Player 6.4: And they made WMP Classic wshich installs with Quicktime Alternative versions 1.5x to 1.7x: Let's take this thing over, make it ours, make it so we can use it to play ALL content.

Don't you realise, that no matter how much money you pump out to Itunes and Windows Media Content, you DO NOT and NEVER WILL "Own" your own music, like you used to own, when you bought a Record or a CD? Or when you DOWNLOADED an MP3 file?

MP3 files are the content we as consumers REALLY Want: We want MP3's and we want WinAMP to PLAY our MP3's with! Give us, Give us, Gimme our MP3 Player, Gimme our WINAMP!

(Remember! http://oldversion.com/program.php?n=winamp !

Score: 0

By daklak2

edited May 13, 2006 - 10:48 AM

Tried to download Winamp from Winamp.com this evening (10.44PM Saturdat VietNam time) but the server was not responding.

This was the greatest Winaamp of all (v5).

Thanks for the player, guys and good luck for the future (Winamp employees).

Score: 0

By hugh750

edited May 15, 2006 - 1:33 PM

I too tried to log on to winamp's web site but couldn't and i'm in the us and i'm using internet explorer 7 beta 2, And i'm a long time winamp user.

Score: 0

By freightrain

edited Dec 29, 2005 - 8:48 AM

I agree that Winamp is going downhill. I've been a paid subscriber since 2002. In 2005 I bought a new PC and ever since I intalled Winamp on the new PC I've had nothing but trouble, and have been unable to contact support for assistance. Everyone I ask keep telling me to drop Winamp and go with someone else.

Score: 0

By jambora

edited Dec 9, 2005 - 7:55 AM

AOL...you have made a blunderous error. WINAMP, since the beginning of mp3's and before...since the beginning of streaming audio...since the beginning of listening to audio through one's computer...has been the "cadillac" of players. The recent additions by the Nullsoft team of CD Ripping and Encoding...again showed competitors that WINAMP was indeed the premier player. SHAME on you for not investing heavily in this aquisition. And to think I "almost" switched to AOL as my internet provider. Jeeze...I'm so glad I found out in time that AOL/Time Warner has but one thing...the enrichment of it's stockholders...at the expense of virtually ANYONE else, including users of it's products...on it's plate of "things to do." SHAME ON YOU...for floundering WINAMP, and the ingenuity it engeandered.

Score: 0

By TheDroidDotBot

edited Feb 11, 2007 - 1:26 PM

hear - hear - all ye - all ye -

LLyama - - - 4 ever
(watch out they spit)aladin -disney(C)

v.295 or 5.24 (rem win med)

find - betanews.wot

Score: 0

By winamp

edited Dec 4, 2005 - 2:52 PM

WinAMP ROCKS! I relly hope it goes Open-Source. I also love SHOUTcast. LONG LIVE WINAMP!!!!

Score: 0

By musicnutfor2

edited Sep 11, 2005 - 10:48 AM

LONG LIVE WINAMP. I use winmp 2 on one machine and 5.1 on another. winamp has been the best so far. As a music nut I love all that winamp offers, even if it comes with AOL, which I'm not fond of.

Score: 0

By mackeydigital

edited Sep 7, 2005 - 11:28 AM

Winamp abandoned? Nothing could be further from the truth. You will be pleased to know there is an aggressive focus to restore the player to it's former prominence as THE leading-edge media player. To that end the new features included in the 5.1 release are:

FREE - AOL Radio featuring XM
FREE - SHOUTcast Wire Podcast Directory
FREE - Predixis MusicMagic Dynamic Playlists
PRO - Rip/encode music into aacPlus, MP3, WMA & AAC

There is also a renewed commitment to support the International community. Winamp Pro is now available in all countries not specifically excluded by US export law (which of course means it is now available in Denmark!) There are also plans to support additional languages via plugins and native capabilities.

Many new features are currently in development for the remainder of 2005 and well into 2006.

Keep the faith - love the llama.

http://www.winamp.com/player/

Score: 0

By djorgensen

edited Dec 23, 2005 - 6:16 AM

WinAmp is long dead and there is no bringing it back.

I'm afraid it was bought by the wrong camp, i.e. AOL and now doomed to the same fate as its parent, the trash can!

Score: 0

By jambora

posted Dec 9, 2005 - 10:34 AM

Sounds like an AOL marketing henchman talking here. Obviously, you haven't READ the article, don't believe it (in which case you know nothing of AOL) or have a "vested interest" in AOL's marketing scheme.

LONG LIVE WINAMP!!!!!!!!!

Score: 0

By stestagg

edited Sep 21, 2005 - 9:40 AM

The Llama has gone from the splash screen and been replaced by something that looks like Advertising. The Installer places like to 3rd party websites on the desktop. Winamp may not have been abandoned but it HAS taken on a distinctly commercial feel. This does not feel like the Winamp of youre. :)

Stephen

Score: 0

By digitalman

edited Jul 14, 2005 - 6:18 AM

3x,5x... :( I'm still using Winamp 2. It's really best player!
http://www.qefinder.com/

Score: 0

By tobex

posted Jan 6, 2005 - 5:13 AM

do you seriously think AOL's going to close down nullsoft for good? After the final version Winamp 5.08 @ xmas there is only one programmer left according to http://nullsoft.de, but this media player is too good to go down!

Score: 0

By Faunito

edited May 23, 2005 - 11:19 AM

What I don't believe is the high watermark level of corporate stupidity that some "organizations" can attain, against all logic. Why, those big shots at AOL have had the nerve to arouse the wrath of literally MILLIONS of traditionally delighted WINAMP users worldwide!!! What do they expect, gratefulness? Is that what they call "Public Relations"? Justin Frankel & all the NULLSOFT team's geniuses deserve our gratitude, respect, admiration and praise. AOL? All of the contrary. SHAME ON THEM!!!

Score: 0

By nothersin

edited Nov 13, 2004 - 1:56 PM

AOL has the stink of death. Everything they touch goes to hell. A few examples, NullSoft, Netscape, Time-Warner(Formerly AOL-Time-Warner). I wish someone would put AOL out of its misery, for the sake of other unbought companies and programs.

Score: 0

By Scipio

posted Nov 13, 2004 - 6:40 PM

"AOL has the stink of death."

You took the words out of my mouth, although I was going to say "kiss of death."

They kill everything they touch. They had a great business model but lousy software, lousy developers, a lousy beta testing system, and lousy products. Now the business model is going down the tubes too, and well deserved.

Score: 0

By Kathryn

posted Dec 8, 2004 - 6:37 AM

Hummm...well it doesn't really bother me...I'm a dedicated foobar child...:)

Score: 0

By nightops

posted Jan 4, 2005 - 8:15 AM

First off, it's FUBAR, not foobar. Next, this is a tragedy to the entire industry. Bright minds such as Frankel and Pepper should not be restricted by such a mediocre company like AOL. AOL is a dwindling company from an era of gone-by ISPs. I agree with the thought that AOL should be put out of it's misery. Companies that fail to promote creative thinking are simply trying to turn our corporate culture into the workaholic slave zombie culture that Japan has. Does anyone here really want to live in a society with as many deaths/suicides attributed to work/overwork as we currently have because of alcohol?

Score: 0

By improvelence

posted Jan 4, 2005 - 3:24 PM

No, actually guy..the software IS called Foobar. (look it up) Winamp died the day Frankel sold his soul. I still use it religiously, but its day came a long time ago. All we can hope for is that it goes open source. My hats off to Justin though, winamp is definately my most used program of all time...and we all make mistakes.

Score: 0

By mamapapaxp

posted Nov 13, 2004 - 10:35 AM

Whilst WinAMP 5 has the marvellous facility to provide me with literally thousands of pro and amateur radio stations 24/7 with little resource drain then it'll have a loyal fan for life in me.

SHOUTcast was WinAMP's ace in the hole and whist one media player may play video better, and another may organise better, (though I doubt it,) and a couple more even feature radio, (albeit either paid for or very lacking in choice,) there is absolutely nothing that comes close to WinAMP for sheer, all-round, beauty.

It even has the best damned visualisations on the planet! Let's face it, in it's current incarnation, (or even at 2.x for the die-hards,) it plays most formats well and without hogging, it has plug-in architecture, (that cannot be taken away and allows others to add to its' portfolio of features,) it's skins are k.e.w.l. as hell, and if it never sees another revision, thanks to those nice people at AOHELL, it'll still be the best 'all-rounder' on the planet.

N.B. I even use mine with an alarm plugin to wake me up every morning to a jazz station from across the globe. For parties, I wire it up to a 42" plasma screen with some trippy vis such as MilkDrop or R4 and stream a funky station that announces the artist and track on screen...
The list goes on... Long live WinAMP!

Score: 0

By FurahiVsZuri

edited Nov 6, 2005 - 10:33 PM

I agree that Winamp is simply the most beautiful.
I've long since abandoned Windows, but I use xmms (formerly x11amp, after winamp) every day and wouldn't change it for anything.

Score: 0

By DeepMix

edited Nov 12, 2004 - 11:49 AM

Hell YA NullSoft !!!!
Get a mammoth tech player "AOL/Matsus***a"
to buy what amounts to a bright shinny thing for millions,walk away with cash in hand ,start another succesful company (Ea games-Trip Hawkins) and watch as AOL scratches it's head like a Neanderthal and uses purchased shinny thing as a nut cracker. 3do's M2 system was bought by Matsus***a who basicly did nothing with it,$100 million nut cracker.

Winamp will just lose it's rank as #1 mp3 player, not die(for a few years anyway). I've been using
v2.XX for years, it has options i use frequently, why change. I still love ya NullSoft LONG LIVE LlAMA'S !!

Score: 0

By bradud7

posted Nov 12, 2004 - 7:29 AM

I do not know much about Nullsoft and AOL, but I love to use Winamp for Mp3-s.

I'm sure the Nullsoft team started by believing in what they did and they do not believe any more, so they have resigned. In a big (global) company you are not yourself any more; as a part of the "assembly" you just have to play... when you are enough about playing... you resign. It is about the less life we have.

Score: 0

By Sublmnl

posted Nov 12, 2004 - 2:01 AM

What performs better? A TV/VCR/DVD Recorder or seperate high quality components. WinAmp will always be a quality PC audio component. Open-ended as open source...allowing users to add components via plug-ins...WinAmp is capable of playing just about any audio file source. This is a sad day. I do not want a mp3,wav,ogg,flac,ram,vcd,mpeg1,2,3,4, everything player. I want WinAmp 3.0 with great visulazations. Its what it did great. I want a great player for DIFFERENT content. I DON'T EXPECT YOU to be great at everything. Don't ruin my software. That being said I still like WinAmp 5.0....especially the skins.

Score: 0

By Aires

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 5:53 PM

Will anyone really cry? I doubt it.

Score: 0

By wfacer

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 2:45 PM

Parts of Winamp 3 are in open source.

As for Winamp 5, I'm sorry to see it go. It was the king. I hope that Winamp can be open sourced. Or atleast the Winamp Clone XMMS can be made into windows. Both have great features. XMMS can easily be adaptable to Windows with new features or improvements.

Score: 0

By Nigmaâ„¢

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 4:38 PM

WinAmp was my only mp3 player and it will remain. Long Live WinAmp.

Score: 0

By reets

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 1:43 PM

This is really sad news I my eyes. I love WinAMP and I just other software by Nullsoft like NSIS. I hope that the developers continue to develop these things or start another company and develop such software or create new stuff.

Score: 0

By DoctorO

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 7:05 PM

with regards to NSIS >> http://forums.winamp.com...?s=&threadid=198931

-daz

Score: 0

By aszure

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 1:32 PM

I, for one, will miss winamp. Until recently (started to use media center from jriver) its been my only media player. I remember dumping winplay (circa 1997) and going to winamp and never looked back. However, media center came to v. 10 and it just kicked ass. So winamp, old friend, you will be missed.

Score: 0

By myke

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 1:31 PM

The only decent media player out there (in my opinion) is now gone. Bring on the bloat!

Score: 0

By Montrell274

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 1:16 PM

All software is destined to fall. Winamp is no exception. I thought it was going to last at least to the 7.x version. It did a h*ll of an upgrade when it went from v3 to v5. It is stable now at 5.05. Open-source is a great idea, maybe bringing some new features.

Score: 0

By bad_juju

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 12:27 PM

And I bet WA5 will keep working, too, even if they cancel the product, which I seriously doubt. Nobody's forcing you to upgrade/delete/switch applications.

Windows Media Player? Ha. I'd rather eat glass.

Score: 0

By Heron

edited Nov 11, 2004 - 11:49 AM

No matter what happens to players around us, we users are still alive, and will remain using the player for some time. I for one am still a supporter of Sonique. And it is in my opinion one of the best players ever. I think that Winamp, with its big userbase, will continue to have the support which might (I stress the word 'might') make the developers go for it again. Pray that no company will destory such a product should it happen.

Score: 0

By patmc7

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 11:35 AM

Unfortunately once a program has been developed there's nothing more to be done. All software is destined to this fate. (For instance, how many more features does one need in a word processor?)
Winamp is a good program, and unless we get another revolution in the way music is stored, there's nothing more that could be added to the program. And with a freeware business model, there's no future returns after the product has been produced.
On the bright side, Microsoft is likely to reach this point someday.

Score: 0

By Cekay

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 11:24 AM

So ... what will happen to them ? Will this saga continue ... everything keeps on repeating ... even if it`s bad and evil ...

Score: 0

By nasserd

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 9:16 AM

To the remaining few: just "accidentally" release the source code of Winamp 5 to the masses, and see how quickly other independent developers will snag a copy and run with it. As much as AOL would threaten anyone, they have no financial benefit of pursuing academic developers -> they are the bread-and-butter of AOL's ISP services! If they make no money off Winamp5, then its release makes zero difference to them.

Score: 0

By dcode

edited Nov 11, 2004 - 11:28 AM

Leaking the source code doesn't mean it is all of sudden open-sourced and free to use. AOL could still take legal actions.

If that were the case, Microsoft wouldn't be so worried about their windows source code leaked on the internet: http://www.neowin.net/co...17509&category=main

Even if you don't make money from it, doesn't mean it's yours to do what you please.

Score: 1

By ptolemy

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 8:40 AM

Like most of you, I remember listening to my first mp3 on WinAmp 1.x and thinking, "wow, this is the future". Those guys at NullSoft changed the way we ALL think about digital audio and we should be wishing them well in their next job - I'm sure their great minds will help produce amazing software that continues to change the future of computing.

Score: 1

By Sativarg

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 8:31 AM

Seems a shame to think that a program that wipes the floor with Media player is struggling to stay alive. I just found out how great it is. If every user donated $1 or its equivalent in their currency AOL could probably go GNU>

Score: 0

By marcos_cu

posted Nov 13, 2004 - 4:15 PM

No, it couldn't in its current state. Many of the encoders/decoders are NOT owned by Nullsoft/AOL. For every download, AOL is required to pay the owners of the license a fee (what it is, I don't know).
Winamp Pro costs money just for this reason. Most, if not all, of the money required for a Pro registration goes to Sonic and other companies that provide the encoders.

As of now, Winamp's code is highly mature and it is doubtful that people who have never seen the code before would be able to improve it or add to it without damaging the code.

Plus, if Winamp was bought from AOL, hosting would have to be moved off the AOL servers, and given the immense amount of data on the servers and the bandwith required, it would not be an improvement.

Score: 0

By Couscous

edited Nov 12, 2004 - 1:50 PM

I remember the first MP3 I ever heard.. It was "Da Da Da (Ich Lieb Dich Nicht Du Liebst Mich Nicht Aha Aha Aha)" by Trio. I played it with WinAmp.

We owe a lot to Nullsoft.. THEY are the ones who "Really Whip the Llama's A$$"

Score: 0

By DoctorO

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 7:37 AM

A program is only as dead as the community around it and i don't see a dead community. People are still starting to use Winamp (just going by the noob posts in the Tech Support forum) and plugins, etc are still under active development (which is where the main focus of Winamp things have been over the last year or so).

Just because all of the original members have left Nullsoft and the impending doom of AOL does not mean that the program is dead. How long was it between 2.8x and 2.9x coming out? By that time scale Winamp should have been classed as dead a few years back. So what if there aren't many new builds doesn't that indicate that the program is stable? Isn't that what people want, stable software. If not then give me 5 minutes and i could make you something to crash Winamp and the OS like it's going out of fashion.

The fact that this has only just been picked up on is quite sad really since it's been a known fact since before 5.04 came out that there was not much of a development team left, why not call the death throw then?

Now i may be ranting but when you see people coming along and going 'oh so winamp is dead now' when a new build is under progress, it does somewhat get on my wick. Winamp is more than just a program since there's a whole community around it which is what has helped make it what it is. When that community dies then that is when Winamp dies.

-daz

Score: 1

By Musashi_Sama

posted Nov 12, 2004 - 6:53 AM

You're right. The winamp community is alive and kicking and there's many people that can get the open-source and refinate it...

Score: 0

By Sativarg

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 8:32 AM

HEAR HEAR

Score: 0

By freightrain

posted Dec 29, 2005 - 9:14 AM

WHERE WHERE?

Score: 0

By dapence

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 7:20 AM

Winamp helped usher in the era of MP3. While not always the best, it's dominant presence, easy of use (and installation for consumer level users) went a long way to help MP3s permeate the Net.

So, so long (if true) Winamp, and thanks.

I wonder what this means for another pioneering application that AOL took over, ICQ. AOL already went back on their word to not introduce banners and other advertising into the application. And for those who may remember, AOL has all but killed yet another pioneer, CompuServe.

AOL, once it's gone (and it will be), what nice little swath of destruction it will leave in its wake.

Score: 0

By hardgiant

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 6:49 AM

Winamp should have stopped at 2.9, it achieved all it needed. 3.0 was just silly and 5.0 was a nice try at a media player for video but with other better video players it wasn't neccessary.

1. Winamp 2.9 = good
2. Foobar 2000 = Great ( love the tabs )
3. Media player 6.4 or ZoomPlayer and sometimes WMP10

Score: 0

By brenton

edited Nov 11, 2004 - 4:35 PM

Well, I kinda disagree there, if they would have stopped at 2.65 that would have been great for me. In my opinion it was the perfect ballance of quickness and capability and function (except the lack of video support) not to mention I have found it much more stable than the 2.9 versions. I still use Winamp 2.65.

P.S. I created an account just to comment here :)

I forgot to mention, I have always been a big fan of Nullsoft so this is really a shame

Score: 0

By RaZZoR

edited Nov 11, 2004 - 6:05 AM

Why would anyone use winamp, its ugly, sounds bad...why mention it all.

Use Foobar it takes a while to get used to it, but after you never leave for crap like winamp and so on.....

Score: 0

By DoctorO

edited Nov 11, 2004 - 7:10 PM

Yes Winap is dead!! (i'm not the best speller but at least get the item in the topic right :) )

If it hadn't been for internal conflicts over Winamp then fb2k wouldn't have appeared (as i've read things so the point is mute).

Does it matter what player you use as long as it suits what you need? Fb2k is a decent program (i used it for a while myself) but it's not suited for everyone and trying to force feed it down people is not the way to go. Use what you want to use not what people make you use!

-daz

Score: 0

By RaveN-FH-

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 11:16 AM

Who do you think started the revolution? It certainly wasn't foobar.

That and foobar is the worst name ever. foo is probably the stupidest "word" i've ever heard as well. damn us programmers.

Score: 0

By Heron

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 11:45 AM

I don't think it is good to insult a player which changed the way we use computers. Foobar might be better, but the start was not created by it.

Score: 0

By tp

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 12:23 AM

foobar

Score: 0

By Portal3

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 5:51 AM

foobar? Sounds much like an acronym of swear words ripped from an old movie.
Formerly: "fubar" F***ed up beyond all recognition.
The name itself pretty much sums it up. Long live WINAMP!
AOL - Age Of Los**s

Score: 0

By Qlib

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 2:05 AM

foobar may be small and fast and s*** but its about as userfriendly and ugly as a full diaper... so IF winamp is ever completely killed off one day foobar is definetly not where I'll go.

Score: 0

By RaZZoR

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 6:12 AM

Foobar is userfriendely, if you just start using it more you will notice..

Score: 0

By RaveN-FH-

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 11:17 AM

you're missing the point of user friendly. i shouldn't have to use it more for it to be user friendly. it should be immediately user friendly.

Score: 0

By holygoat

edited Nov 12, 2004 - 4:47 PM

If you're used to a certain program (ie Winamp) a different program may seem less user friendly because you are so used to the other. Foobar is an excellent audio player - the best out there, IMO.

Winamp is also an excellent program, but I'm with those who never liked the versions beyond 2.XX. It's kind of sad to see Nullsoft disappear, but the nature of the internet is such that other Nullsofts will come and go. The bureaucracy of companies like Microsoft will never allow for the kind of "labor of love" development that creates great stuff like Winamp.

Score: 0

By fourte3n

posted Nov 10, 2004 - 10:00 PM

It's been a long time coming. Hopefully aol stop supporting it and release it to the open source world.

With WMP, iTunes, VLC and many other contendors that support more file types winamp was destined to fall.

I feel sorry for the devolpers, but rest assured that they can always make something else!!

Score: 0

By csamaha

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 1:24 AM

This news is very disappointing indeed. I'm not sure about Itunes, but I would have to disagree that WMP plays more file types. As far as I know, Winamp can play everything that WMP can play plus ogg and flac. To me, the ability to play ogg files is extremely important. Plus, if winamp does not play a certain file type out of the box, you could almost certainly download a plug in that would allow it to work with that file, and that has always been my personal favorite aspect of winamp. I won't even say how I feel about AOL, but to put it lightly I think it's a shame that they succeeded in squoshing a fantastic piece of software and discouraged the creative minds who worked so hard to write it in the first place. Just my thoughts.

Score: 0

By BlackDragon64

posted Nov 10, 2004 - 7:22 PM

I found a program called Quintessential Player.
This program runs a boat load faster on my machine. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed winamp, but v5 looked cool, but ran dog slow.
Quintessential Player run wonderfully.
Give it a try.

Score: 0

By Portal3

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 5:55 AM

Winamp 5 is slow? Sure, it might not handle well on a 386 PC but go figure. It takes less than a second to load Winamp with a multimedia hotkey, then it's easy listening. I've always prefered the standard classic skin so I wouldn't know about slow. AVS is also a great attribute of Winamp.

Score: 0

By mlevit

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 1:00 AM

Same with me, I used Winamp until I discovered iTunes.

It's unbelievably better then any other musics player. It is like the Firefox or web browsers.

Rated No.1 by the Australia PC magazine and rated the No.1 digital jukebox in the world.

Recommened highly.

Score: 0

By bugmenot

posted Nov 10, 2004 - 7:44 PM

AOL had never made any of their acquisitions work: Nullsoft and Netscape are just two examples. Fortunately the open source Mozilla project is now under mozilla.org and the project has taken a turn for the better, releasing version 1.0 the highly popular browser Firefox yesterday (www.getfirefox.com).

For those who are looking for a music player, there are two good options: Quintessential player (www.quinware.com) and foobar2000 (www.foobar2000.org)

Score: 0

By kgruber

posted Nov 10, 2004 - 5:13 PM

I never really liked Winamp 3.x nor 5 because they were slow to respond on my laptop -- HP Pavilion ze4300. They performed slower than WMP 9 and 10 respectively in my experience.

I still like to use Winamp 2.81 just for MP3 playback because of its small footprint and lightning fast response, but WMP 10 is my player of choice for all other audio and video playback.

I don't have any faith in AOL breathing in new life (and speed) to WinAMP and have a feeling that the program will eventually die off or be incorporated into another AOL offering.

Score: 0

By tannman1

posted Nov 10, 2004 - 4:21 PM

Once again America On Line has taken a worthwild product and shot it down with it's buy it up and either drive everyone away or turn it into crap. Whats next?? The next demise we can hope for is AOL going down in flames with it's declining user base, perhaps people will wake up and smell the roses.

Score: 0

By normangerman

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 3:41 AM

Looks just like the old Netscape situation

Score: 0

By saltynuts

posted Nov 10, 2004 - 4:38 PM

AOL paid big bucks for winamp for a reason. That reason never beared fruit for them so it is understandable why they would put a lid on it. Windows media player, itunes and real have relegated winamp to just a standalone player and AOL is not interested in that.

But it's nothing to cry about, all the players involved got their worth.. well maybe except AOL

Score: 0

By bsr500

posted Nov 10, 2004 - 4:56 PM

AOL = RIAA

Score: 0

By noise98

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 1:46 AM

Hum... I totally disagree about that version 5 being slow or using too much cpu.

Use the Winamp Classic Skin and u will get the same performance as Winamp 2.

Score: 0

By deviantATTILA

posted Nov 10, 2004 - 3:40 PM

A damn shame is what it is. But, I'm satisfied with Winamp's current feature set to use it for awhile longer. I probably would only replace it with a winamp clone that allows me to sort by audio length. :)

Score: 0

By cPingN

posted Nov 12, 2004 - 1:06 AM

Uhm.. you CAN sort by length, or filesize, or just about anything you can think of. Damn you people knock the program and haven't even seen half of it. The media library rocks and i have yet to find a player with something like it. You can even sort by most or least played, recently added, create queries, etc.
It plays every audio file I've seen and almost every video. THe problem with video has always been codecs. Other programs seem to know how to figure out which combo works right - winamp is a little braindead. You have to use a program like GSpot Codec Information Appliance to change around certain filters' "merit". It sux, but with a little tweaking it CAN play just about EVERYTHING. It doesn't do a great job of DVDs or DVD files tho. But if there could have continued work.....

oh well. For those who look through ALL the options, winamp 5 does a LOT if you have the machine for it, but can still run well if you have an older machine (classic mode, don't scan 8000 mp3s into the database...)

Score: 0

By Zulithe

posted Nov 10, 2004 - 3:26 PM

Anyone keeping an eye on Winamp knows things haven't been that great since the launch of 5.0, slowly, ever so slowly, it is dying. It's a wonderful product and I use it daily. If it does die for good, we do still have foobar2000 ... but its development has slowed dramatically as well of late.

Score: 0

By gsbrock

posted Nov 10, 2004 - 2:25 PM

This bring back horrid memorys of Sonique. I used to work closely with the original team Sonique beta testing and developing plugins (mostly visualizations), HB, Scir, and the rest of the gang; it was so sad when that all got taken apart after Lycos purchased them. I'm sorry to hear that AOL has done the same with Nullsoft. Never followed Nullsoft and WinAmp much because of focusing on sonique, but to see these good independent developers get purchased, then driven into the the ground by the corporate machine... That's good old american capitalism for you.

Score: 0

By ds0934

posted Nov 11, 2004 - 10:44 PM

I'm bummed out by this. I've bounced around nearly a dozen players trying to find one that fits my needs and moods (and doesn't crash or hog the machine). I like WA 5.05 and will probably keep using it until they sneak in some sinister code stream to kill it or something evil like that. It seems the obvious recipe for eventual doom is to do only one thing (in this case: music players). Netscape, WordPerfect, WinAmp, to name a few, were all beaten down by conglomerates with more diversified operations to spread and cover costs, yada yada. If anyone thinks they're going to make it big in software these days, they better also make cars, microwave ovens and kids toys.

Score: 0

By MeltedGeneral

posted Nov 15, 2004 - 8:29 PM

i was with winamp during the Napster era, left during the xp era, plan on rejoing the pionner of Gnutella. let aol rot in corporate hell. All Hail Nullsoft.

Score: 0

By ditt0

posted Nov 19, 2004 - 4:55 PM

Yea, guess what , version 5.06 is released.So much for ur predictions, huh?:)

Score: 0

By mewse

edited Nov 22, 2004 - 10:20 PM

When you read this, please understand, that this is by any means no complain, but expression of my emotions trying to bring some truth to the internet community about events that took place which have been hidden from public. Although, this may read as some sort of conspiracy, this is a true story, how history really happened.

Let me begin stating that my life for the past 5 years was hell.

Truth is, Justin didn't invent WinAmp. Actually Justin Frankel is a liar, but he paid me (Dmitry Boldyrev) off to not say anything. The reason why I had to take the gag and not bring the case, which I intended to do at the time, was because I was poisoned (but who did it? hmmmmmm good question, I am still trying to figure that one out) and couldn't deal with court proceedings. For the past five years I was in hawaii trying to deal with the poison, breathing it out of my body. Try day long meditations, Mr Frankel, maybe it will bring you a better understanding of the world surrounding you. Or I guess you're not interested in the truth, the money has blinded you completely. Sure, having few millions in the trust account you probably have a different view on the world.

I would like to share what I have done with the money that I received from the miniscule settlement that I received.

1) Started a vegan restaurant in Hawaii, which was rated #1 by PeTA this year

2) Helped many musicians

What do you have to show for your millions, Mr Frankel? Yes, we've heard about your love for cars. Is this best you can do? Lets not mention your guitar playing skills, because I dont know how many people are laughing behind your back.

Before I begin, I'd like to introduce the reader to the fact that I am very sad for this country, and result of its so called elections. It just shows to me that democracy isn't happening here. The result of my history of events that took place in my life, I am starting to question, the very reason why AOL bought WinAmp. My realization led me to believe that AOL needed WinAmp to establish control over media on the internet, music media and radio media in particular. I've met a guy (right hand man of Steve Case @ AOL) Dave Cole?, nice guy actually. Interesting, at his lecture he kept referring to people as software, maybe he needs a break from his work and learn to understand people on more personal level.

As I was so closely involved, nobody even asked me about Nullsoft sale to AOL. I guess they never considered me anything more than a stupid russian who we can **** over as much as possible. But personally, I always considered myself a 50% cofounder of Nullsoft (any thoughts on this, Mr Frankel?). So is this the American tactic that we keep hearing about, invite people from other countries, rip off their ideas, enslave them, use their ideas and talant to make money, and then take it off shores to further enslave everyone around? Long live WTO?

So, now to the story: what TRUELY happened with the whole WinAmp thing.

I met Justin Frankel at CADE lab at University of Utah in mid 1997 where we both attended engineering school. He was at the time interested in computer graphics, working on Plush 3d gfx engine. Goruraud shading, nothing too fancy. I guess it was quite fast. I was an old-skool music demo coder person. In 1989 I discovered Scream Tracker for PC, which inspired me to write music software, and ever since I've been amazed by computer music, which led me to creation of first gui mp3 player-MacAmp. Beforehand, I wrote many other music-players (for PC and Mac), like MacMikMod, DSM player, MusEd and so on. I've been programming music editors and players since my x286 in DOS in 1988. I had to switch to Mac because of my boss, professor of chemistry Jack Simons, where I worked at the time, who was a big Mac head. I am thankful to him eternally! As much as I like Windows (which is probably not true ;) I think Mac is just a better platform. Funny, I was just at my friend's ISP place, where he'd fix virus problem for all the PCs. There was quite a few of them lined up. Heh eh :)

I introduced Justin to my project MacAmp and suggested he made windows version out of it. Him and I were friends back then. Eating dry ramen, college students, what more to say. Until that point, when it became clear that big money was going to be involved. Quickly (with help of his father, Blake Frankel who recently changed his name, just in case? who was a lawyer) I was "nicely" thrown out of company, like I was never even a part of it. Nice plot. Sure it's easy to **** somebody over when they are only in the country for five years and whose parents, are actually distinguished scientists from Russia, who had absolutely no sense of business. School of hard knocks? I remember going around telling people at chemistry department that mp3 is going to be future of music, and everyone laffed saying they already happy with CDs. If you ask me, I have a Technics MK3D sitting next to me. Nothing beats LP mastering ;) and I am starting to like CDs again. ;)

At some point I suggested that we make mp3 radio out of MacAmp and WinAmp, he of course understood what I was talking about, but didn't implement it until it was safe to do so.

I even know that Nullsoft sent out spies into Napster, which later resulted in creation of Gnutella. I know Shawn, and everyone involved in Napster in early days, and they know. I talked to them on the phone, they called me and told me the story.

If you doubt this, ask creator of unix code Amp, Tomislav Uzelac, who actually had to sue Justin to prove that Nitrane was AMP based, which Justin said it wasn't.

What about countless hours of time my friend Tima spent supporting WinAmp at early days? Did you help him out? After all he was the inventor of the WinAmp's moto ("It really whips the Llama's ass").

Reason why I am writing this, is because I am finally better, yes I have a lot of anger in me, still, which I'd like to let go. And best of all I don't give a s*** anymore, I am going to talk, and this is my public statement. I am going to post this everywhere I find a lie mentioned. We can't continue lying, if we do, we'll destroy ourselves and our world.
This is my FINAL realization.

You want to ask me why I created MacAmp and WinAmp? I didn't create it for five majors (record companies) to take their music oppression, which we've been hearing in the stores for a decade (same s***) online and sell it. I created it to free music completely, help mind evolve and awaken everyone's emotions (what government doesn't want us to have apparently or why can't we gather and celebrate life together without alcohol?). I am not here to say that Nullsoft is bad or not, whever they did more good or bad, but to state what kind of people they are, and by far not heros they proclaim to be. Unfortunately for me, my health was compromised, and I was unable to carry on my mission. Sorry world. Although I still have a lot of anger towards these guys. Despite this, I would like to acknowledge the hard work of Justin Frankel and Tom Pepper, they are great programmers, and wished, they were better people, and for the record: they didn't invent the idea like they claim it. BTW, I don't know why Tom Pepper has so much anger towards me.

C'mon man, you made $10mil out of the deal for hosting (winamp.com) website and writing a tiny little server application.

And Robert Lord, what's up with all this sabotage with macamp.com domain. You people are... I have no words for you. Make money and sink a sick person down the drain. Would you do that to your own mother too if you could make money off it?

Do you people realize WHERE you live? Maybe you should.

In the end, I invite the reader to refresh on an article on cnn I gave interview for stating about freedom of music.

http://www.cnn.com/TECH/...saltzman_mp3/index.html

Thank you for your time reading this, I know it's a bit long, and formatting might be a bit off.

May love fill our lifes and may god(s) help us reunite and bring peace! This is why I am making this post. To resolve my anger towards gods who created this situation for me, to teach me something? I will continue to trust, and have faith in humanity, as I've ever done.

So now that I feel better, I'd like to send my love to all my friends who helped me through hardest years of my life, I love you! You know who you are.

Dmitry, the inventor of MacAmp and WinAmp.

Score: 0

By rb

posted Dec 4, 2004 - 5:35 PM

What's the name of your restaurant? I will tell people to go there.

I'm sorry for your situation. I didn't know it was so bad. Having not owned a PC during the WinAmp heyday, I was unaware of the friction. I liked your MOD player softare on the Mac, though. Thanks.

Score: 0

By TexHell

edited Nov 29, 2004 - 12:09 PM

Score: 0

By crimsontider

posted Nov 23, 2004 - 8:52 PM

MP3 Players
In the early 1990s, Frauenhofer developed the first, however, unsuccessful MP3 player. In 1997, developer Tomislav Uzelac of Advanced Multimedia Products invented the AMP MP3 Playback Engine, the first successful MP3 player. Two university students, Justin Frankel and Dmitry Boldyrev ported AMP to Windows and created Winamp. In 1998, Winamp became a free MP3 music player boosting the success of MP3. No licensing fees are required to use an MP3 player.

Score: 0


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser