Daily News columnist Michael Goodwin wrote Saturday that “Clinton’s Friday performance adds to my growing belief the dream ticket is an on-again possibility.” He continues, “it’s obvious he has to consider putting her on the ticket. She gave a better speech than he did (my emphasis) and won the gravitas weigh-in. She would help him reach more women and lower-income whites if she were on the ticket than a mere surrogate.
    “They certainly looked like running mates, which shifts the dream-ticket question. Instead of why should he, it becomes why shouldn’t he?
    “The only way he can say no is by showing he can win without her, and that having her would actually subtract from his ‘change’ brand.”
    Or would this olive branch serve, in his camp’s opinion/hope, to silence our movement to put Hillary where she belongs, at the top of the ticket? I do think we frighten them. They’re reading my lowly blog, after all. How funny!
    McCain’s “campaign,” if you could call it that, is being run so badly that the one true threat Obama faces is a left-field independent challenge by Hillary. If they think we can pull it off, and we think we can, what are we waiting for?
    Hill, yeah, she can do it!
July 1, 2008
1 Comment »
I’m bored by dream ticket talk. And no, they don’t look like running mates.
Obama has the right to choose his own VP. Hillary has the right to do whatever she thinks best. We have the right to make our vote anyway we like.
PUMA 08
Comment by Laurie — July 5, 2008 @ 9:14 am
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwriteinhillary4prez.files.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F06%2Fwritehillin.jpg)