Insufficient Responses- A Thought on Nehemiah 1.4
September 4, 2008“As soon as I heard these words I sat down and wept and mourned for days, and I continued fasting and praying before the God of heaven.” -Nehemiah 1.4
The other night I was made keenly aware of a failing I have. By now, most all of us who watch the news have heard the reports of Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s pregnant 17-year old daughter. Over the past couple days this story has proliferated all the way out to the covers of celebrity gossip mags such as Us Weekly, and has attracted some attention as to the Governor’s readiness to be President or Vice-President (see David Letterman). Whatever your leanings, it appears that everyone interested has an opinion in this matter.
However, one thing seems to be falling through the cracks. Even in my outrage at the coverage I too missed it until Wednesday evening when I was watching an otherwise innocuous segment on John McCain arriving in Minneapolis for the convention. It was during the footage of his arrival that I saw it. McCain walked down the stairs of his aircraft and casually made his way down the line of family members awaiting him. His wife Cindy and their 7 children were all standing by to give him handshakes and hugs, greeting him for what was sure to be the biggest two nights of his life. Then, following his family, he was greeted by Gov. Palin, her husband, and their 5 children. McCain continued to move through the line the same way he did with his own family, until he got to Gov. Palin’s 17-year old daughter Bristol.
Arriving at Bristol, accompanied by her 18-year old boyfriend Levi, Sen. McCain stopped, held her hands, and spent a few moments talking with and embracing the young girl on that runway. On camera you could not hear what he said, but it was evident from the gentle fathering mannerisms he exhibited that Sen. McCain was doing his best to console and care for a young girl who has just had her most embarrassing secrets shown to the world in a way that most of us can never imagine.
Myself being all too familiar with the frustrations and bitter joys of teenage parenthood was able to relate in some small way with what this young couple is going through, and the moment of attention which Sen. McCain paid to them here touched me deeply. In fact, I didn’t realize how deeply I was touched until I tried telling my wife, who was in the other room, what was being shown and started uncontrollably crying instead. The mixture of knowing how difficult this young girl was having things combined with the genuine compassion being displayed by Sen. McCain struck me in such a way that I could not help but be crushed by the emotion I felt.
Looking back, this raw, emotional response has been serving to convict me of what is normally a more staid, even cold demeanor which I carry towards everything. I was convicted about how I see fellow humans struggling in assorted areas of life and yet am quicker to utter criticism than I am to shed a tear. I was convicted about how I see people who don’t know Christ moving closer to death everyday and yet somehow my heart is unmoved. It is not supposed to be this way. This is not how I should react.
We see in Nehemiah that when he received news of the destruction of God’s city and of the scattering of His people, there rose up a deep and broken response, a response of tears and prayer and fasting, which lasted for days. Nehemiah was troubled over the pain of the Jews. He was troubled over the suffering incurred and the damage which had been done to God’s people.
This type of response is so foreign to me, and yet I am convicted that it is a response that I need to cultivate. In the way that I was moved uncontrollably by the images of this young couple, I need to be moved by the same images of lost people, of suffering people, of people God has commanded me to help and to minister to. This is the heart of Christ and I realize that my current responses are insufficient to capture the love which Jesus called me to exhibit, and that is simply unacceptable.
Not Dead Yet!- A Reflection on Colossians 3.5-6
September 3, 2008“Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. On account of these the wrath of God is coming.” -Colossians 3.5-6
How seriously do I take the call to put these things to death? In a given day I could break the commandments on this list numerous times and not even flinch. How am I so desensitized?
I have a head knowledge of Christ’s commands and the awfulness of God’s wrath, but so often I am completely unable to connect it to my actions. For every one time I feel supremely aware of God’s glory and the magnificence of what he’s done for me, there are three times where I feel like I’ve stripped off my clothes and cowered naked in shame behind the bushes.
I understand the “fear and trembling” of “work[ing] out [my] salvation” (Philippians 2.12). It’s not fear that God hasn’t done what he said, it’s fear that one day God will realize what an awful mistake he made in choosing me!
Everything May be Spiritual, but Only the Gospel Saves- A Commentary on Acts 10.1-11.18
September 2, 2008“And Cornelius said, ‘Four days ago, about this hour, I was praying in my house at the ninth hour, and behold, a man stood before me in bright clothing and said, “Cornelius, your prayer has been heard and your alms have been remembered before God. Send therefore to Joppa and ask for Simon who is called Peter. He is lodging in the house of Simon, a tanner, by the sea.” So I sent for you at once, and you have been kind enough to come. Now therefore we are all here in the presence of God to hear all that you have been commanded by the Lord.’” -Acts 10.30-33
“How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? And how are they to preach unless they are sent? As it is written, ‘How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!’ But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, ‘Lord, who has believed what he has heard from us?’ So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.” -Romans 10.14-17
One of the most overlooked New Testament stories, in my opinion, is the interaction between Peter and Cornelius in Acts 10 and 11. And even when we do focus on this it seems that all we say is “And here we see the Gospel opened up to the Gentiles” (which is true, don’t get me wrong, but just read on). However, I think in focusing on that we miss a really interesting commentary which speaks to a large objection to orthodoxy arising in our emerging culture these days.
It’s cool to be semi-universalist. On the heels of Rob Bell’s tour Everything is Spiritual and in light of past comments by figures such as Brian McLaren and Billy Graham, we see a swelling tide towards, if not universalism, at least a universalism where all “spiritual people” are saved. The idea from Bell is that the Gospel is Jesus telling us that we live in an “integrated holistic spirituality” and so, as in his title, everything we do is spiritual, and de facto, everything we do is worship to God (a thesis which, think about it for a minute, is completely false).
But, instead of fighting over the words of men, let’s look at what the Word of God says in Acts 10 and 11. This passage presents us with the story of a non-proselyte Roman centurion who, though not officially a Jew, nevertheless offered devotion to and feared the one-true God (Acts 10.1-2, 28 ), and as a result of his devotion God decides to use him as the entry point of the Holy Spirit and salvation to the Gentiles. This we usually state and then move on to Peter’s vision and the eventual evangelization and regeneration of the Gentile gathering. But, let’s take a closer look at the setup.
Who are we presented with? A non-Jewish Roman who through some set of circumstances and interactions has taken to worshiping the one-true God. We know that his worship is of the God of the Jews because the text states that he was “a devout man who feared God with all his household.” So, not only is Cornelius spiritual, but his spirituality is directed towards the living God, even though he is not a member of God’s covenant people Israel. And what does this spirituality get him? Under popular theology that is enough. Cornelius is a spiritual person, living a spiritual life, and doing his best to please whatever God is there. This seems to be the criteria in our society, and certainly in the theology expressed by people like Graham, for salvation. For all intents and purposes Cornelius should expect to find himself in heaven when it’s all said and done just by what he has already demonstrated.
Yet is it enough? Is his spirituality and devotion enough? Using no other text besides Acts 10 and 11 I would argue that the answer is a resounding “No.” Why do I say this? Well, look what happens. First, we see that an angel comes to him and delivers a cryptic message about sending men to Joppa to retrieve the apostle Peter (10.3-6). Then, when the men return with Peter we see that Peter’s response to why God called him was to preach the Gospel of Christ crucified and resurrected to this gathering of Gentiles (10.34-43). Upon hearing the Gospel the Gentiles receive the gifting of the Holy Spirit and are baptized by Peter and the believers that accompanied him as a sign that they have gained salvation and been brought into the covenant people of God (10.44-48). Finally, after all of this, we see Peter testify to the fact that he was brought to give the message of how Cornelius “[would] be saved” (11.14).
Do you see it? Peter came to preach how Cornelius “[would] be saved.” As in, he wasn’t saved already. Regardless of his spirituality and devotion, it was not until he believed in the Gospel of Jesus Christ that Cornelius was saved. He was even devoted to the one-true God and yet that still was not enough without his ascending in faith to the message of the Cross. If Peter or someone else had not come and presented the Gospel then Cornelius would never have been saved, no matter how spiritual and good of a life he led.
And still people miss this. It is clear as day. If Jesus saying “I am the Way and the Truth and the Life” is not enough (as Rob Bell argues in Velvet Elvis) then hopefully this testimony will be sufficient to convince us. There is no salvation without faith in Christ. “There is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4.12). Please get this, lives are at stake. It may not be cool, but at least people won’t be going to hell because we wanted to feel good about ourselves and be liked.
Pry the Baton Out of Their (C)old, Dead Hands- An Opinion on Age Trends in the SBC
September 1, 2008“Let no one despise you for your youth, but set the believers an example in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith, in purity.” -1 Timothy 4.12
I am a Southern Baptist. I am also a young adult (23 to be exact). These two things alone put me in a declining population segment in American Christianity. Following this past years Southern Baptist Convention in Indianapolis the cat was officially out of the bag: the SBC is getting older (for discussion of this click here). Simply put, more and more young people are leaving Southern Baptist churches (as well as most other denominations in America) and the end result is that our congregations are getting overloaded with the grey-haired guys in three piece suits who sit in the front row and still use a King James Version of the Bible. Needless to say this is not a good trend.
Just today there is a book coming out by Lifeway Research director Thom Rainer entitled Essential Church? which focuses on dealing with the question, Why do so many young adults (18 to 22) leave the church, and what will it take to bring them back? I have a copy already sitting in front of me, though as yet I have not begun to read it. I do, however, have my own opinion on something that can be done to alleviate this problem.
Now, being 23 and not 53 I am not going to sit here and tell the middle-aged bulk of the congregation in our SBC churches what to do (though I think I may have insight, I don’t feel it appropriate to just throw them under the bus). Instead, the people I want to address are the target age group (18-22 year olds) as well as my population of young adults (23-35 years, roughly).
What is the cry that we hear coming up from the 18-35 year old “emerging” generations? Paint it any number of ways, what it basically boils down to is “I don’t like the way my church does things.” So, what are we doing about it? We’re dropping out of those churches and either roaming around on our own vague spiritual journey or starting new “avant-garde” churches which stick a thumb in the eye of our more traditional, orthodox roots.
Yet, why did we leave our original church in the first place? Did they teach a theology we disagreed with? Was the music boring? Did their modernist ecclesiology offend our superior post-modern sensibilities? The first question I think we need to ask is, What is a sufficient reason for leaving a fellowship? From where I stand there seems to be a lot of juvenile arrogance which comes into play when we assert our psuedo-justified reasons for dropping out of the congregation we grew up in.
But what is it that makes this arrogant? It is because we are in effect saying “I know a better way to do it.” That’s the rub. We are unhappy with our churches because they are unappealing to us and because we think we could do it better. This then leads to a youth exodus from traditional churches and a massive influx of new emerging congregations. Yet what do these look like? The emerging churches are composed of young (typically white, but that’s another post) believers who are experimenting with doing church their own way. And the traditional churches they left? They continue doing business as usual only without as many youth and young adult members as they had before.
So, we are left with this general picture: an emerging church with all youth and no experienced senior leadership and a traditional church with no vibrant, idea-filled young underbelly. The end result from this is that our traditional churches get stuck in their ways, moving further and further into legalism and ritual instead of authentic worship, and the emerging churches spin-off with all types of liberal theologies which are more of reactions to felt injustices and less of seasoned observations from a lifelong pursuit of the Truth in God’s Word. This is not good on either end.
Then what is the solution I propose? Simply this. Young adults, if you don’t like the way your church is being run and you have a biblical conviction to this extent, do something about it in your church! (This goes particularly for SBC members who have a congregational polity). What does this something look like? It looks like going to church meetings, working to rise up in leadership and making your voice heard.
But, you object, the old people won’t listen to me? Well of course they won’t. Look at Timothy in Ephesus. He was put in leadership by Paul as a young man and all of the older church members looked down on him, saying he was too young and disavowing the things he said because they thought he was rash and immature. But what does Paul tell him? He says, strap it up, live the way you know to live from Scripture, and go out there and show them what it really looks like to serve Christ (1 Timothy 4.12). Now of course, this doesn’t mean to disrespect people (1 Timothy 5.1-2), but what it does mean is to show them that when it comes to making a difference in the kingdom of God, there is no age requirement, only a passion and righteousness of life lived.
If as young adults we are dissatisfied with our church we have to step up and step into leadership in the congregation. And if the old guys on the deacon board refuse to pass the baton of leadership to you, you have to wrestle it from their hands. It is up to those generations to fix any flaws they may have in their service of the Lord in the local church, but what we need to do is not sit back and blast their failings, but instead aggressively pursue change. The church is meant to contain a spectrum of ages. Older men and women have as much to give to the younger people as the younger ones have to give to them. If either population is missing in a church then it will not be able to function completely as God intended it to.
I know this is hard. I understand that it is easier to just go off and start your own church instead of going through the frustrations of struggling for a leadership voice. But at the end of the day, God desires for us to take that torch from the older generations, using it to light the church for many more years to come, and not just letting it die out with them. To steal from a couple of youths who are vocal about this cause as well, we must buckle down and realize that God will be most glorified when we “do hard things.”
My Favorite Old Testament Figure is Jesus- A Reflection on Acts 28.23
August 30, 2008“When they had appointed a day for him, they came to him at his lodging in greater numbers. From morning till evening he expounded to them, testifying to the kingdom of God and trying to convince them about Jesus both from the Law of Moses and from the Prophets.” -Acts 28.23
“Then he said to them, ‘These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.’ Then he opened their minds to understand the Scriptures.” -Luke 24.44-45
This past week, when I was preparing for my Sunday school lesson over Acts chapters 27 and 28, I was reading through the material to get an initial overview of what was said and the above passage in Acts 28.23 really struck me. It didn’t strike me as unique or as some sort of new revelation, in fact, it was its familiarity which caught me. Not the familiarity to this passage in particular, but the familiarity of this same action being recorded as an action of Christ in the Gospel of Luke.
Upon deeper reflection I found that in Acts 28.23 and Luke 24.44, as well as Luke 24.27 and Acts 8.35, 24.14, and 26.22, this action of showing Christ in the Old Testament (the “Law and the Prophets”) was a common form of apologetic used by the apostles in the early church. Again, this wasn’t a new revelation to me, but for whatever reason it really spoke in my heart of the awesomeness of God’s supreme plan anew.
I think sometimes we become a victim of reading the Bible as “Old Testament = Stuff about God and the Jews” and “New Testament = Stuff about Jesus and Christians,” when clearly this should not be the case. What is started by Jesus and continued by Philip and Paul is a commentary to the fact that the whole Bible is about Christ and the plan of salvation which God had worked out for us from the beginning of Creation! It is easy to picture Christ as a backup plan which God came up with somewhere down the line when he realized that humans were just going to screw it all up (as groups such as the Mormons do) but this belies the fact that starting in Genesis 3 we see that God knew what he would do thousands of years later in a “rural little hick town” in Israel.
Mark Driscoll gave a list of 25 fulfilled prophecies of the Messiah which are recorded of Christ in the New Testament in his book Vintage Jesus. I copied these down into a Word document to share with my Sunday school class and I am also going to post them here. Being able to look at the sheer number of things which Christ did in accords with Old Testament scriptures (and these aren’t even half of them) is one of the great testimonies we have today to the authenticity of his life and ministry, and as such we should become familiar with them in the way that we see members of the early church being. They knew them well enough to spend “morning till evening” sharing them and making a defense for their hope in Christ (1 Peter 2.15). Do we know them well enough to spend 5 minutes on?
In closing up, I pray that we will stop for a moment and look at the glory of this seemingly innocuous statement. Paul showed them Christ in the Old Testament. Doesn’t sound like a big deal. But when viewed as calling us to the thread of seeing Jesus throughout the Bible, to moving him from the last third of the book into every page from cover to cover, the magnificence of what God has done is that much more magnified. Everything he has ordained, from the start of Creation to the coming end, he has done to show his power, display his glory, and make his name known among his people. That’s something that I am thankful to be a part of and is a praise which I will be glad to sing for all eternity long!
Impressions from the Word- Jeremiah 42 and 43
August 28, 2008“Then they said to Jeremiah, ‘May the LORD be a true and faithful witness against us if we do not act according to all the word with which the LORD your God sends you to us. Whether it is good or bad, we will obey the voice of the LORD our God to whom we are sending you, that it may be well with us when we obey the voice of the LORD our God.’” (42.5-6)
This needs to be an element of all of our requests. Obviously there is a desired answer when we come to God, but our end purpose should be in “obey[ing] the voice of the Lord,” regardless of what his will reveals. So much of our submission is feigned, so rarely do I find myself perfectly submitted to any response by God. Instead I develop my own man-made provisions and go to God asking for his blessing over them. And even when he withholds that blessing I find myself doing it anyway and just asking for forgiveness. This is no way to serve God.
“If you will remain in this land, then I will build you up and not pull you down.” (42.10a)
What does this say to our isolationist Christian subculture? God has placed us here, in this society, under this government, and he had his reasons to do so. Yet Christian consensus today seems to be screaming its discontent with our circumstance and so moving away, out of society, in order to be “safe.” We avoid things that we judge to be wrong, denying interaction, resisting infiltration. We appear to know the right way better than God and seek our own means of correcting the flawed places he put us in. We withdraw into our fortress, safe from R-rated movies, public schools, and single parents. We know utopia. We can make it and we can go there. Still all along it must be that God knew what he was doing and in denying that, we are denying him and his good intentions for our lives.
“If you set your faces to enter Egypt and go to live there, then the sword that you fear shall overtake you there in the land of Egypt, and the famine of which you are afraid shall follow close after you to Egypt, and there you shall die. All the men who set their faces to go to Egypt to live there shall die by the sword, by famine, and by pestilence. They shall have no remnant or survivor from the disaster that I will bring upon them.” (42.15b-17)
We find that choosing to flee and escape where God intended for you to be in hardships will not preserve us. God promises that the evil which we fled in Jerusalem will follow us to Egypt and get us there, even though we expected to be safe.
“‘You are telling a lie.’” (43.2b)
The world is quick to reject what it doesn’t like. So is the Church. It is important to develop a will which does not bear up with pride whenever our world view or comforts are challenged by the command of God. Just last chapter we saw the Israelites say they would heed God’s word through Jeremiah, whether good or bad (42.5-6), yet when it’s bad they decide to fight against it. As Christians we need to analyze our reaction every time we feel ourselves disturbed by a teaching in order to make if it is the Spirit which unsettles us or our own sin-dwelt flesh.
Looking Back, Turning Back- An Apology for Previous Words on Dan Kimball
August 26, 2008“Know this, my beloved brothers: let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger; for the anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God.” -James 1.19-20
A while back (January 4, 2008) I posted this which was a critique of some issues I had with a statement written by Dan Kimball in his book They Like Jesus but Not the Church. The excerpt in question dealt with Kimball’s personal feelings towards homosexuality and my post covered a few exceptions I took to the things he said. I attempted to do this with as much fairness as possible while still expressing my particular misgivings for what was in the quote.
However, several months removed from this, I have taken time to reevaluate what Kimball said and more importantly the larger body of what he was saying and would like to offer an apology for my quick judgment. Though I do believe that the critiques I had are valid issues with some people inside Christian circles, I no longer feel that they apply to Kimball and would like to admit this for future reference on my blog.
In all actuality, though I still have some uneasiness at the title of a few of his works, I am finding Kimball to be a welcome voice of reason inside the ranks of emerging Christianity. His boldness and devotion to teaching the Word of God over the philosophies of man are wonderful traits which God has graciously blessed him with and has led him to use in reaching Christians in the postmodern context. Unlike certain peers such as Brian McLaren and Rob Bell, I find Kimball to be committed to finding the truth in the Scriptures and sober-minded enough not to be swayed by the all powerful arm of culture and stardom which has gripped so many of these teachers.
I pray that this apology can be accepted by any who I have displaced by my comments and I thank God for leading me back into seeing the work that Kimball has done for the Church and how God is using him in our culture today. I would also like to recommend his book They Like Jesus but Not the Church to you guys because, even though I find the title to be less than desirable, the contents reveal a very necessary insight into emerging culture which all leaders of the church in America can benefit from reading.
Olympic Coverage: The Opiate of the Masses- A Reaction to the Media, China, and Christianity
August 25, 2008In the wake of the 29th Olympiad and all of the wonderful story lines, there is one story which I am glad to be done telling, that being of the greatness of China. I do not mean this in a racist way or as a culturally ignorant Westerner, but I mean this in the way that so many news organizations seemed to focus in on the pageantry and precision of the execution while dreadfully neglecting the true state of things in that Communist nation. I guess as much is to be expected from the mainstream media, however, the article which really sent me over was one I found posted here on the Christianity Today blog.
The very first point of the article is laughable. The poster says that one of the “shifts” that he saw communicated in the Opening Ceremonies was China’s “[increasing] . . . open[ness] to the ‘barbarians’.” To anyone who knows about the severe lack of religious and individual freedoms for many of those living in China this is just absurd. Of course, he later explains himself by saying, “Sure, the doors may still be closed in many respects–human rights and religious freedoms are still lagging in China–but there seems to be a growing openness in the culture.” Oh, so as an excuse-me let’s mention the religious intolerance and human rights violations, yet what’s really important is the “openness in the culture.” I think if we stop kidding ourselves for a second we will see that the only openness exhibited by the Chinese government was an openness to Western money and a world legitimization of their oppressive political control. Where was the openness in the Chinese government revoking Joey Cheek’s visa because he planned to participate in protests during the games? Where was the openness in a government imposed shutdown of house churches in the 90-day period surrounding competition?
Of course, if one wants to talk about openness, why don’t we see if China could pass the Town Square Test as proposed by Natan Sharansky in his book The Case for Democracy:
If a person cannot walk into the middle of the town square and express his or her views without fear of arrest, imprisonment, or physical harm, then that person is living in a fear society, not a free society. We cannot rest until every person living in a “fear society” has finally won their freedom.
Of course, testing this isn’t even necessary for China, just look at the number of people detained by China for non-violent protesting over the last several weeks. This test may be a little too extreme, but I think it gets to the point.
The second header in the article is almost as bad: “Skin color and racial stereotypes are becoming irrelevant.” The author states this while citing the fact that China collected representative children (cute ones, of course) from their 51 ethnic groups to parade in during the ceremonies. Yet doing this and saying that it makes these children capable of “becom[ing] all things to all men” takes on a different color when pictured up against the treatment of Taiwan and Tibet by the Chinese government. Sheer diversity of population alone does not make anyone more Christ-like.
So, to ask the author’s question, What does this mean for the church? Well, in his eyes this signifies “an ecclesiastical and theological shift . . . . com[ing] from outside Western cultures,” and it serves as a call for Americans to “experience what God is doing globally.”
While I agree that there is much need for Americans and other Westerners to open their eyes to the work God is doing all over the world, particularly in Korea, China, and the Global South, I think we need to be careful exactly what we’re emphasizing. The church is growing in China, through underground house churches and devoted missionaries who are risking their lives every day to see Chinese people reached for Christ. Check that again, risking their lives. This Chinese government which people have been hailing after watching the Olympics is the same government which is threatening the lives of every single Christian living inside China today. And the church, devoted and close-knit, is like this out of necessity. They do not have the freedom to construct megachurches and to put their sermons on Podcast. So, as much as we need to realize they are there, glorify God for their salvation and intercede for their well-being, we also need to realize that that is an environment that we just can’t, and shouldn’t want to, recreate.
Not just that, it is not ideal. Yes, they are very biblical in their obedience and faithfulness to God, but as I have argued previously, it is not God’s desire for us to be oppressed beyond our control. (Though if we are oppressed he can certainly use that the same way that he has for the church in China). We need to embrace the freedoms that we have been blessed with in the West and use them to give glory to God in the fullest way possible. It seems that so many inside the Emergent church are riddled with something akin to “middle-class guilt”; they feel guilty for being American. This certainly seems to be the case for guys like Rob Bell, and I believe it is wrong. We are blessed with the abilities to serve God in so many unique ways through the freedoms of America and the financial abundance we have, and to feel guilty for this instead of thanking God for it and turning it back to him in our spiritual worship is a sin.
I am very excited about the global work of God and I have no problem with the future of the Church being influenced by non-Western cultures, but I think we must be very careful while doing this not to celebrate a government which is persecuting Christians, jailing dissidents, and coercing abortion just because we feel bad about the condition we have let our own portion of the Church fall into.
Impressions from the Word- Jeremiah 36-40
August 24, 2008“Take a scroll and write on it all the words that I have spoken to you against Israel and Judah and all the nations, from the day I spoke to you, from the days of Josiah until today.” (36.2)
Again we see God’s decree to record his words.
“[S]o you are to go, and on a day of fasting in the hearing of all the people in the LORD’s house you shall read the words of the LORD from the scroll that you have written at my dictation.” (36.6a)
And here we see Jeremiah obeying God’s command of having the Word preached to the people.
“For I will surely save you, and you shall not fall by the sword, but you shall have your life as a prize of war, because you have put your trust in me, declares the LORD.” (39.18 )
Here we have such a clear statement of what God demands to be saved from the coming judgment: ” . . . because you have put your trust in me.” Ebed-melech had faith that God would preserve the faithful, that God’s condemnation would be spared on the obedient, and God rewarded this. We need this. We need to see in this time of Christian religious ambiguity that what God says is that Ebed-melech was saved by faith. Not by good deeds. Not by seeing a poor, starving, mistreated member of society and helping him (Jeremiah 38.7-13). No. God surely saves him because he trusted in God.
“Why should he take your [Gedaliah's] life, so that all the Judeans who are gathered about you would be scattered, and the remnant of Judah would perish?” (40.15b)
It is a great mistake to rest our hopes of peace or prosperity on any earthly leader. Here we see the Judeans placing the strength of gathering the remnant upon the presence of their governor and not on the promise of God. So do we do this. With politicians and pastors, we erect pedestals and cry that we cannot survive without some greatness of theirs. Yet the whole Bible speaks to the inability of man to sustain such hopes. We also stumble, fall, and let down whatever movement has built up around us. Instead, we should put the focus properly on God in Christ, who always remains faithful, and thus never fails us. Christ is Lord. This means over everything.
Jesus Got What He Had Coming- Understanding the Prophecy of Isaiah 53
August 23, 2008“Surely he has borne our griefs
and carried our sorrows;
yet we esteemed him stricken,
smitten by God, and afflicted.
But he was wounded for our transgressions;
he was crushed for our iniquities;
upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
and with his stripes we are healed.
All we like sheep have gone astray;
we have turned-every one-to his own way;
and the LORD has laid on him
the iniquity of us all.” -Isaiah 53.4-6
“Then he said to them, ‘These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.’” -Luke 24.44
Two thousand years after his death people still debate why it was that Jesus came to the earth. Was it to be a great teacher? To die for sins? To save Christians? To feed the poor? Just why did this “humble Galilean peasant” rise up from Nazareth (where surely nothing good comes from; John 1.46), go about performing miracles, enter into Jerusalem, and then, when at the height of popularity, subject himself to being executed on a Roman cross? And then, three days later, if you really by into this part, why did he raise out of the grave and reveal himself to his mourning followers? These questions are variously answered and debated everywhere, from churches to coffeehouses to blogs and even in the jungles of South America, and the convictions on such drive the lives of millions of people still today.
One place to search for answers to these questions is in the Old Testament scriptures. As it says in the Gospel of Luke, “And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, [Jesus] interpreted to [the disciples on the road to Emmaus] in all the [Old Testament] the things concerning himself” (24.27). Similarly in Luke 24.44 and Acts 8.35.
Particularly with the Acts 8.35 verse we see that one key passage of prophecy which spoke of Christ was Isaiah 53. I personally refer to Isaiah 53 quite frequently when expounded on my feelings about the necessity of the cross, God’s intentions in it, and what was accomplished. I am not alone in this either, and so, because I don’t think I have nearly enough time myself to talk about the amazing contents of this passage, I thought I would point you guys to someone who I think does it better than I could anyways. That someone is John Piper and what I want to post is a series of three sermons which he delivered over Isaiah 53 some time ago in his church in Minneapolis. I hope that you can take the time to listen to them, each one is about 35 minutes in length, and that through listening to them you can further appreciate and understand what Christ came to this earth to accomplish, and that this accomplishment was the intention of the Father all along.
Please feel free to comment as well, as I think the discussions that can arise from Isaiah 53 are ones that really get to the heart of what it truly means to be a Christian and be saved and forgiven by the blood of Jesus Christ.
John Piper- Jesus Christ in Isaiah 53, part 1, part 2, part 3



Posted by Todd Burus