Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

rain falls on everyone

Blogging (mostly) about theology and popular culture, media, film, television, music, politics and current events. With some stuff about whatever I want thrown in for good measure.

Info

Daily Reads

Discuss

Popular Posts

Navigate

Recent Comments:

Recent Posts:

I'm a Blog of the Day! Get Firefox!

[image] Explore Christian Blogosphere (a FeedBurner Network)

BlogBurst.com Anti-PC League

Archives

Categories

abortion (2) art (7) baseball (1) canada (13) church (7) communication (1) ethics (6) funny (15) global warming (2) imagination (2) internet (25) life (54) media (51) ministry (3) movies (2) news (128) politics (33) pop culture (38) protest photos (7) random (25) Rant (4) religion (26) site maintenance (12) theology (49) Toronto (17) U of T (9) Uncategorized (2) video (13) yankees suck (1)

Terrorism and Religious Motivation

| Trackback |

The other night I went out to dinner with some friends. They are all good friends, very good friends. At one point in the course of the evening, we had a conversation about US foreign policy, Guantanamo Bay, the war in Iraq, and especially about terrorism. I respect my friends’ opinions, however I found it quite disturbing the insistence upon denying that there is a religious motivation for the acts of terrorism that we see happening in the world today.

The concept of “jihad,” according to my friend, is something that has been taken out of context from the Qu’ran, and blown out of proportion by those insistent that there is a “War on Terror.” Really, the acts of violence perpetrated against the West, according to my friend’s reasoning, have more to do with US foreign policy, our reputation in the world, and social and economic issues among the people groups that are conducting these terrorist activities.

I just wanted to take a moment and respond:

We can dispose of the “social and economic” argument straight away. If the most recent rash of terrorist attacks in London and Glasgow has taught us anything, it is that there are people of high education and social standing who are ready and willing to carry out destruction against innocent lives in the West:

With six foreign doctors, one medical student and a former lab technician in custody after a four-day manhunt, investigators are quietly satisfied the “major suspects” in the case are in hand.

All eight detainees have ties to Britain’s National Health Service, overlapping in their duties at two hospitals in England and Scotland.

Doctors. Al Qaeda recruits doctors to perpetrate the terror against us.

Further, watch Robert Spencer’s appearance on Cavuto, here, where he discusses the fact that most of the jihadists are of higher social standing and wealth. Also - I don’t see Osama Bin Laden hurting for cash…

So, if it isn’t social oppression, poverty, or any of those things, what is it?

It seems as if the Toronto Star, linked above, has a hard time figuring this out as well:

All eight detainees have ties to Britain’s National Health Service, overlapping in their duties at two hospitals in England and Scotland. Most also have roots elsewhere, but investigators have thus far found scant few common threads in their respective backgrounds in Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, India and Saudi Arabia.

The word “Islam” is not even mentioned in the article. The word “Muslim” only once, in relation to the Muslim Council of Britain.

Let’s look for a moment at some of the things that might be motivating these terrorists. At the outset, I’ll just say that I’m not accusing all Muslims of terrorism. But, I am saying that there is a religious motivation for the terrorists that try to hurt us - and that this is their central motivation.

At Jihad Watch, Robert Spencer gives us this:

Across town from the site of the recent attempted car-bomb attacks, several thousand Muslims gathered in front of the London Central Mosque to applaud fiery preachers prophesying the overthrow of the British government – a future vision that encompasses an Islamic takeover of the White House and the rule of the Quran over America.

“One day my dear Muslims,” shouted Anjem Choudary, “Islam will govern Britain!”

Choudary was a co-founder of Al Muhajiroun, the now-banned group tied to suspects in the July 7, 2005, London transport bombings and a cheerleader of the 9/11 attacks.

“Democracy, hypocrisy,” Choudary chanted as the crowd echoed him. “Tony Blair, terrorist! Tony Blair, murderer! Queen Elizabeth, go to hell!”

Muslim leader Abu Saif, who kept his voice at a fever pitch through declarations such as: “Brothers and sisters, make no mistake. Make no mistake. The British government, the queen, the MPs in this country, they are enemies to you, enemies to Allah and enemies to the Muslims.”

Abu Saif is believed to be a member of the group Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Party of Liberation, which states its aim is to unify Muslims and establish Islamic rule over the world. The group’s Cambridge cell reportedly had tried to recruit the Iraqi doctor now suspected of mounting the attack on Glasgow’s airport June 30. The failed car-bomb assault followed two similar attempts in London the previous day.

Abu Saif spoke with disdain of Blair’s appointment as a special envoy to the Middle East, issuing an apparent threat.

“Inshallah,” meaning “Allah willing,” he told the crowd, Blair will “go to the Middle East as an envoy, and he’ll come back in a box. Inshallah. What box that is, we leave that up to you.”

Over 3,000 in attendance, in front of the largest Mosque in the UK. Read the whole thing.

Choudary is a Muslim leader who stated that attacks such as 9/11 and 7/7 are perfectly justified, as only Muslims are innocent.

I would also state that these terrorists are motivated by hate, and that this hate is rooted in deep religious belief. Take for example, from Hamas Television, the indoctrination of hatred towards the Jewish people in children, on children’s TV shows:


As Spencer points out, that Haddith can be found here.

And then there is the incitement to kill and fight Jewish people, also bred from religious motivation, fed to children through Palestinian television, in which a Mickey Mouse look-alike is beaten to death by an actor playing a Jewish man. A 3-year old girl calls in to the program to express her hatred, saying that the Jews killed Farfur:


But, maybe that is all anecdotal.

Words on Jihad from those who understand it best - Muslim scholars. This from the preface to a booklet, found quite easily through a Google search for “Jihad.” This is found on “youngmuslims.ca“:

Though jihad may be a part of the answer to the problems of the ummah, it is an extremely important part. Jihad is to offer ourselves to Allah for His Cause. Indeed, every person should according to Islam prepare himself/herself for jihad and every person should eagerly and patiently wait for the day when Allah will call them to show their willingness to sacrifice their lives. We should all ask ourselves if there is a quicker way to heaven? It is with this in mind that this booklet is being published.

Further, the issue of Jihad is taken up by Hasan al-Banah. Again from the preface:

Imam Hasan al-Banna is the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood and one of the pioneers of today’s Islamic revival. It is a shame that so many people are unaware of this man and his contribution towards what we see today. It is the right of the contemporary Muslim generation that they should have access to the writings of this great reformer; especially on this important topic.

The Imam, may Allah bless him, shows us that ultimately, and insha’Allah (God-willing) time will be a witness to this, only Islam can save mankind from itself. And jihad on the individual and international scale will be a necessary part of this process of change.

The article goes on with al-Banah’s words:

Jihad is an obligation from Allah on every Muslim and cannot be ignored nor evaded. Allah has ascribed great importance to jihad and has made the reward of the martyrs and the fighters in His way a splendid one. Only those who have acted similarly and who have modelled themselves upon the martyrs in their performance of jihad can join them in this reward. Furthermore, Allah has specifically honoured the Mujahideen with certain exceptional qualities, both spiritual and practical, to benefit them in this world and the next. Their pure blood is a symbol of victory in this world and the mark of success and felicity in the world to come.

Those who can only find excuses, however, have been warned of extremely dreadful punishments and Allah has described them with the most unfortunate of names. He has reprimanded them for their cowardice and lack of spirit, and castigated them for their weakness and truancy. In this world, they will be surrounded by dishonour and in the next they will be surrounded by the fire from which they shall not escape though they may possess much wealth. The weaknesses of abstention and evasion of jihad are regarded by Allah as one of the major sins, and one of the seven sins that guarantee failure.

Islam is concerned with the question of jihad and the drafting and the mobilisation of the entire Umma into one body to defend the right cause with all its strength than any other ancient or modern system of living, whether religious or civil. The verses of the Qur’an and the Sunnah of Muhammad (PBUH) are overflowing with all these noble ideals and they summon people in general (with the most eloquent expression and the clearest exposition) to jihad, to warfare, to the armed forces, and all means of land and sea fighting.

Well, so much for that theory. The essay continues, asking why it is that Muslims fight:

Islam allows jihad and permits war until the following Qur’anic verse is fulfilled:

‘We will we show them Our signs in the universe, and in their ownselves, until it becomes manifest to them that this (the Qur’an) is the truth.’

(Surat al-Fussilat (41), ayah 53)

People have for some time now ridiculed this but today these same people acknowledge that preparation for war is the surest way to peace! Allah did not ordain jihad for the Muslims so that it may be used as a tool of oppression or tyranny or so that it may be used by some to further their personal gains. Rather jihad is used to safeguard the mission of spreading Islam. This would guarantee peace and the means of implementing the Supreme Message. This is a responsibility which the Muslims bear, this Message guiding mankind to truth and justice.

For our own good I guess - war is a means to force peace upon the world - the peace of knowing the truth of the Quran.

(For more on jihad and Islam, an area that is not my specialty, but that read up on and know how to Google, I would seriously recommend Jihad Watch, as well as the site’s Islam 101, by Gregory Davis. Or, Daniel Pipes on “What is Jihad?“, who states unequivocally: “The purpose of jihad, in other words, is not directly to spread the Islamic faith but to extend sovereign Muslim power (faith, of course, often follows the flag). Jihad is thus unabashedly offensive in nature, with the eventual goal of achieving Muslim dominion over the entire globe.”)

While this is by far a complete survey of Jihad, or religious motivations in terrorism, what I do hope to have accomplished is to show that in the terrorism that we see in the world today, from 9/11, to 7/7, to the Madrid bombings, to the most recent spate of attacks in the UK, to the insurgency in Iraq, to the Taliban in Afghanistan, to the jihadists at the Red Mosque in Pakistan, in all of that there is a religious motivation that goes much, much deeper than the pat answer given by the Left that it has to do with either economic situations, or the US involvement in the Middle East. No. It has to do with a deeply held religious belief that Islam should conquer the world. And some people just don’t get that.

Of course, I suppose I could have done away with all of the above, and just quoted John Smeaton, the Glasgow Airport baggage handler, and overnight hero, if I wanted to show the religious motivation behind terror attacks in the modern world:

Witness John Smeaton added: “It was unbelievable, the guy was in flames and still trying to fight the police. He was a maniac.

He was shouting ‘Allah, Allah, Allah,’ with every punch he threw. I tried to grab him and pull him away. Then he was on all fours covered head to toe in flames.”

Update:How could I forget the terrorism, and its religious foundation, that is sharia law?

Tags: Islam, Terrorism, Muslim, Religion, War on Terror

4 Responses to “Terrorism and Religious Motivation”

Note from Management:

Comments reflect the views of their authors, and in no way do they represent the views, or opinions, of the site owner. I do not endorse a particular opinion just because someone came and wrote it here. I do, however, take responsibility for my own comments. Comments are largely unmoderated, but if they are spam, or incredibly derogatory or offensive, they will be deleted.

While reading this post I was reminded of the 8th grade history book I teach out of, History Alive!: The Medieval World and Beyond, which defines jihad in the Islamic unit as meaning “to strive.”

“Jihad represents the human struggle to overcome difficulties and do things that would be pleasing to God. Muslims strive to respond positively to personal difficulties as well as worldly challenges. For instance, they might work to become better people, reform society, or correct injustice.” . . . “One hadith, or account of Muhammad, tells about the prophet’s return from a battle. He declared that he and his men had carried out the ‘lesser jihad,’ the external struggle against oppression. The ‘greater jihad,’ he said, was the fight against evil within oneself.”

You might think, or hope, that this was publised prior to 9/11 and was thus naive in its perspective. But a quick look to the front reveals a publication date of 2005. It became evident to me that there was certainly a very particular perspective that this book was attempting to teach to our youth.

In one sense, I can agree that teaching children about terrorism can be difficult, if not, undesirable. But I have children and they ask questions. I don’t lie to them, but attempt explaining these things to them because it is the world we live in. Obviously in age appropriate discourse. All I have to do with Trinity (3) is say “Wow! look at that butterfly” and she is off in another direction. But Sivana (9) does ask questions, and I try to answer her. I don’t attempt nor desire to disclose non-realities to my children about a world that is not.

On the other hand, with my history book I’m not teaching children, I’m teaching teenagers. I think they can handle more substantive discussions on terrorism than what is being provided them. In fact, I didn’t have to say anything when we came to this unit last year. A bunch of NYC kids quite perceptively read between the lines and were appropriately critical of the material with its handling of reality. I was impressed. You should have seen them when I showed them the copyright date!

Buck

I imagine that the book would be borderline offensive for a New Yorker, especially as printed after 9/11.

The thing for me here, in Canada, is that one thing I hear over and over again is that the US does things wrong, and the rest of the world does them right. The lines about jihad, Islam being a religion of peace, and the motivation behind terrorism being economic and social, are fed from the Main Stream Media, and are swallowed with little to no critical thought. I am mournful at the loss of what I consider common sense.

Multiculturalism, and Political Correctness, is killing us - literally. If we continue to capitulate on the basis of multiculturalism, then we will be attacked again, and our lack of vigilance will be one of the main reasons.

I wonder why people are so quick to say it is all our fault. It is our fault for our involvement in the Middle East/support of Israel/foreign policy/whatever…not the fault of those who are actively trying to kill us. For some people, I can only conclude, it is easier to blame ourselves than it is to say that there is a culture that has a deeply held religious premise for killing those who do not believe the same as they do. I just don’t get it.

Amen, good post!

Thanks.

Something to say?


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser