Pages

Pick a topic, any topic.

Flickr Photos

Filoni’s Clones

We’ll, I’ve just got back from seeing the new Star Wars film and despite all of those negative reviews that have been flying around, but it’s a Star Wars film and I don’t care that it’s animated, it’s still a good film.

As soon as the lights go down and the film starts it’s fairly clear that this is going to be a change from the previous films. The change from Fox to Warner Brothers is the first change, and the lack of the familiar yellow crawl is another. And, well, let’s just say that John Williams isn’t there, but his influence is still there.

The people who have said “It’s animated, it’s not going to be any good” clearly have too little faith in Lucasfilm and their animation department. Yes it may take you a few minutes to adjust to the new medium, but the essence of Star Wars is there, even if the actors aren’t.

It would, in a way, be unfair to compare this to the six other Star Wars films. Not just because it is animated but because it is, in effect, a feature length TV episode at 98 minutes. But it’s on the Big Screen, it’s got Star Wars in the title and all the essentials are there. It follows the thread of the previous films in that it is a story of Anakin, the chosen one. It is here to bridge a bit of that gap between episodes 2 and 3.

So, what do we learn from Episode 2.5 we didn’t get from episodes 2 and 3? Well, Ahsoka, Anakin’s apprentice really does help you to like Anakin. It’s been hard to like Anakin with these films, the whiny kid in Episode 1, Episode 3’s decent into evil, and just Episode 2 in general, has meant that Anakin just isn’t a likeable person. To try and remain within the confines of what is already out on the net in a non-spoilerific way, the relationship between Anakin and Ahsoka seems to have started, and will hopefully continue, has made him a more brotherly figure.

The story of the film puts Anakin and his new Padawan on a quest to rescue the son of Jabba the Hutt, and let’s just say that the action is still there, the dialogue is still there, the wilhelm scream makes an appearance even if 1138 has become 1137, and it *is* a Star Wars film, and it *is* good.

Something else that impressed me, even though it was already known, was the inclusion of every-body’s favourite Pink astromech. That matched with the arrival of my R2-KT coin is real proof that such a small droid can reach so far.

This is not another Indy 4 from Lucas, it is not another Jar Jar (although he will appear in the TV series, but is not in the film), it is not as good as Episode 3, but far from being a bad Episode 2. I am awaiting eagerly the TV series, and of course the continuation from this film in the TV series. Do not judge this film on the fact it is an animation, it is much more, it is a Star Wars film.

All that remains is the Live Action TV series, I wonder if we’ll see a feature length of that… not before 2010, or beyond. Oh and maybe the 3D project will be here soon.

MTFBWY

The Future…

Well, it’s August 14th which means results day for all those AS and A2 students. I’m pleased to report that I have been accepted by Nottingham Trent to study Computer Science Games Technology. So as of October 1st will be sitting in a computer suite making Grand Theft Auto: Granny Edition (for Matt), Cheese Tycoon (for m00Cow), the long awaited “War Game” (for Mike) or hovercraft racing (for me), depends who wins the right for their game to be made.

Quite what will happen with this blog will be decided at some later point when I’m swamped by code, cursing the world ‘cos I didn’t start sooner. But as it stands the plan is to try and keep it going.

So that’s the shortest post in history over with, all that remains to be said is, YAY STAR WARS TOMORROW, so expect something either hailing it as a wonderful way to continue the saga, or me crying because it’s the worst thing since Episode 1 and Jar Jar (Who doesn’t appear in the film apparently). So until then,

MTFBWY

The Darkest Knight of Them All

It’s been out for two weeks in the UK now, unfortunately I was on holiday for the first week, but I saw it on Monday and was wondering if I should write a post telling everyone what they already knew, that this film is the best comic book film for a long time.

Maybe I should hold off until we’ve all seen Watchmen, which will, if the trailer and all these previews are anything to go by, will be just as good, if not 10 times better. But then I read the story about Heath Ledger’s Joker diary. The list Heath made of “things that make the Joker laugh”. Now we all know the Joker smiles a lot, but what does he find really funny, well, according to the diary, “AIDS, landmines, geniuses suffering irreversible brain damage, brunch, and sombreros” not forgetting of course pencil cases and blind babies.

To many this list may seem like a very strange thing to appear in Ledger’s diary, where could he have possibly got this list from? Well, Batman fans will know, it appears in The Clown at Midnight, from Batman and Son Batman #663, some may not have read this, it was all prose, which put some readers off, but those who read found a very interesting look at the Joker. Grant Morrison took a bold move, breaking what was expected from the Batman series, and in my opinion it worked.

but the point here is not how wonderful the all prose comic was, it’s that it didn’t reach everyone but it did reach Heath Ledger. this proves that Ledger didn’t just dip into the surface for this film he didn’t just go for the favourites of fans, he went in and took everything he could.

The quality of his performance is undeniably excellent, and the dark influences are clear, but the fact he knows what makes the Joker laugh, that he took the super sanity, and still managed to create something new is truly wonderful.

Heath will win an Oscar, that seems almost certain, some will say it is because he is dead, but it isn’t, he produced a truly wonderful performance, that was so deeply researched it goes well beyond a quick skim read of Wikipedia for references.

The Dark Knight was a good film, it was perhaps beyond good but it defies superlatives so I won’t even try. Yes, OK, so maybe some people won’t understand why the Joker needs to laugh at AIDS, or brain damage, but then they just don’t understand the Joker. many won’t understand why Heath Ledger needed to know this, but few can deny, it made a Joker that was the best Joker we have seen.

Perhaps now we can forget the whole gay cowboy thing, and just say, “He was the best goddamn Joker”

MTFBWY

Randy Pausch

Dr. Randy Pausch

October 23rd 196 - July 25th 2008

It isn’t often that a professor from an American university reaches people across the world with one of his lectures, but Randy Pausch managed that. The video on Your Tube has almost 4 million views. The fact it was his ‘last lecture’ no doubt helped with the fame, but what would make 4 million people want to watch a lecture on childhood dreams? Quite simply, Randy would.

I have a copy of his book sitting next to me and it is a book that deserves to be in most people’s library. However Randy’s words best sum up his feelings on his book. After he received a nice letter informing him that over 2 million copies were in print and he was a #1 best seller his response was simple “I only cared about the first 3 copies”. And that is how Dr. Pausch was, he cared far more about his family than he did about 4 million people who have watched his lecture.

Randy succumbed to his pancreatic cancer. He was given a terminal diagnosis September 19th last year, he was told that he had, at most, six months to live. He survived 10 months. But the way Randy lived after that diagnosis he had probably already lived those 10 months in the space before he was expected to die.

For those who don’t know Randy’s story he was an assistant and associate professor at the University of Virgina and had sabbaticals with EA and Disney as an imagineer between 1988 and 1997. In 1997 he became an Associate professor at Carnegie Mellon where he co founded the ETC (Entertainment Technology Center). He has been a consultant for Google, Imagineering, PARC, and Media Matrix. He’s had a trip in the Vomit Comet, Written for the World Book Encyclopedia, met Captain Kirk and won some stuffed animals.And if you wish to watch his last lecture it is on the Carnegie Mellon Youtube channel, here.

For a man who is dead, he sure did a lot of living. He will be sorely missed by not just his family, but everyone who knew him and certainly by the many people who have watched his video, and will see it in the future.

If there is a heaven Randy’s bound to be there, with lots of stuffed animals.

When is a Book Not a Book?

When it’s still a tree? When it’s just some sheets of paper stuck together? Well for some people the answer is actually “When it’s a graphic novel”. Now I’m not going to get into a rant about the difference between comics and graphic novels but before we start let me just make a quick distinction between the two by showing you some pictures to explain the difference.

If you already know the difference, please feel free to skip this paragraph. Here are some pictures of comic books: All Star Batman and Robin and The Walking Dead. And now some graphic novels, Watchmen and Freddie and Me. And just to confuse everything there always the compilation which is a lot of comic strips thrown together in a book, which is technically a graphic novel but is closer to a collection of stories, like Bill Watterson’s Calvin and Hobbes, or the compilation of the Clerks comics. Hopefully that has cleared it up a bit. A comic book is one of those little regular books which you get to read every so often and only get part of a bigger story. These compilations put them all together, normally in chronological order, so you have a nice bound copy of the story lines without needing to worry about reading lots of the comics put together. Now technically Watchmen is a compilation of comics, however they all tell one continuous story, unlike Clerks or Calvin and Hobbes which tell a set of stories. Freddie and Me is a true graphic novel in the sense that it is a novel, an autobiography to be exact, in picture board form. So there’s your difference, on with the purpose of this rant.

Many people seem to feel that because a book isn’t all large chunks of text thrown together then it doesn’t constitute a worth while text and so they have the attitude that it isn’t a real book, made entirely for kids and anyone who is over 12 and still reading these comics clearly has no concept of great works by ‘real’ authors. OK so maybe the content of these books doesn’t contain the high standard of writing from the literary greats, but if we look at these books some actually convey a meaning that people fail to understand. Let’s take Watchmen. If you have never read a graphic novel before this is the one to start with.

Originally from DC comics with a 12 issue, monthly run, this re defined the industry in ways that were unimaginable. With the question of who watches the watchmen Moore, who also wrote V for Vendetta, and Dave Gibbons, Art Director of 2000AD, took the idea of ‘normal people’ who become costumed adventurers despite not having any super powers, well save one. But Watchmen changed everything, the dialogue, the symbolism  and the way we look at those strange masked people.

The story is one of people facing ethical and personal problems, whilst they also happen to be masked adventurers. The differences in people’s morality is also explored within the novel. And all this set against beautifully drawn artwork. This is far from a book aimed at kids, the subject matter is clearly for a more mature audience, so why do people simply see it as a child’s book?

The same can be said of Wanted, or of V for Vendetta, but how about Freddie and Me? It is something that to me seems like an interesting idea, an autobiography, in graphic novel form. As the author states, the format lends itself perfectly to autobiographies. People’s memories are often made of those fuzzy images you can see in the corner of your eye, still frames, so why not just draw them and put the words over the top. Freddie and me tells the life of Mike Dawson who grew up, and indeed remains, a Queen fan, and he relats how Queen’s music has been with him throughout his life.

It is a wonderful book, well illustrated, and far from a children’s book, why would a 12 year old want to read about an American Cartoonist and his obsession with some old band? Then of course you look at a novel like Tales from the Clerks and, just like the films, this book is not for the kids. OK so Calvin and Hobbes is a comic strip that appeals to kids and grown ups. Whether Calvin grows to take the lead in Fight Club or not we all know, deep down, we were that kid once, sort of.

So there you have it, a look at some of the graphic novels. There are so many out there it is impossible to list them all. Wikipedia has a list of the award winning ones, and they are a good place to start. If you’re new to this whole thing and think, maybe I should take a look at some of these things, or if you still aren’t convinced grown-ups can read and enjoy them I suggest you start with Watchmen. Yes, OK the film’s coming out some time soon, but don’t do this how you did your book reports, read the book, you won’t regret it. Following that go and pick up 300, Compilations of Peanuts, or Calvin and Hobbes are always good for a laugh, Freddie and Me may interest you, I would also suggest Cages and there is always Maus infact the list goes on, but that should start you off. If after that you still don’t think these are real books, then oh well, at least I tried.

So, You Think That Was Scary?

Back on 21st March a Spanish horror film was released over here. The film was from Guillermo Del Toro, and with a name like that backing it, there was no doubt it had to be worth a watch. It’s very rare that a film by Del Toro will disappoint you, and let me assure you, this is no disappointment.

There are those who won’t watch a film like El Orfanato just because it involves reading, and who goes to the cinema to read anyway, it’s far too dark. That said there have been some very good foreign language films recently, Kite Runner for instance, and of course Pan’s Labyrinth, also from Guillermo Del Toro. This film was wonderful in the cinema, and now it’s out on DVD I suppose I should correct my mistake of failing to give it some space on my blog.

So often now do we see horror films from Hollywood that rely purely on blood guts and gore to justify their name and use the cheap trick of a stinger, that sound that makes you jump before something happens on screen, that these new horrors really fail to provide anything that truly matches the films from days gone, such as Halloween (the original), The Omen (original) or the Texas Chainsaw (original). Wait.. I;m spotting a pattern with these films and the appearance of remakes, oh well. But this raises the question, despite the fact The Orphanage succeeds in getting you scared without these techniques, for the most part, is it actually a horror film?

It is, undoubtedly, a ghost story, the same vein as Del Toro’s Devil’s Backbone, but it is far more a psychological thriller than a straight up horror. With horror we have the idea that the ghosts are there to scare people, zombies will eat them, sheep will make you into a sheep, sorry, I watched Black sheep the other day. But with this you can either read it with ghosts being there, or maybe it is part of a fantasy from a woman whose son has some very interesting imaginary friends.

Without giving too much away the story revolves around Laura. An orphan who has returned to the orphanage where she spent the early part of her life with her husband, and son. She wants to retun the old building to an orphanage for disabled children, but her son makes some new friends, six to be precise, but none of them seem to be real. Laura slowly finds that something sinister may be lurking in the house, something she must confront if she is to have a chance to save her family.

the fear of ghostly children was explored, with great effect, by Del Toro in Devil’s Backbone and he does it again here. It seems that whilst a child who is dead is scary, a child who is dead, and has a mask made out of a sack is even scarier. But as with the Devil’s Backbone, perhaps that fear isn’t needed.

Something that’s always interested me about horror films is that they never seem the same when you are alone at home as when you are in a cinema. I had the cinema almost to myself when I saw this film, and in a nearly empty dark large room this film is great. in a small dark room at home, it’s almost a little better.

This film deserves to be seen by the world. It is a great step back into what can make a horror/thriller really worth watching. It is a shame that less people will see it, just because it is in Spanish and you have to read the subtitles. If you missed this film in the cinema then buy the DVD, go, it’s out now. If you saw this film in the cinema then you almost certainly have the urge to go and get the DVD anyway so I won’t bother telling you to. And if you are sitting thinking “It’s in Spanish, I’m not watching that”, you are being silly, stop it and watch this film.


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser