[ ]
[image]
[image]
Get Your Personal
On-Air Report Here
[image]
Friday, July 25, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 2:13 AM
Is it possible that many Americans will not warm to the idea of a candidate presuming to speak as an incumbent, and to do so to the world from Berlin? 

I have read a few dozen reactions this morning, and find Scott Johnson's the most nearly like mine:

In his sermon to the Germans, Barack Obama presents himself both as Barack the Baptist and the Obamessiah. Nevertheless, Americans naturally root for for the underdog to prevail. For pride to take a fall. Don't we instinctively seek to puncture the grandiose pretensions of a blowhard? It seems to me that this is the question that Obama's speech elicits.

And one more question. I wonder if Americans will appreciate Obama's deprecation of the United States on foreign soil for his own self-aggrandizing purposes. Surely one does not need to be a conservative Republican to recoil from this display.

Many conservative analysts praised the speech, but opinion elites should check with the independent voters of the industrial midwest where this election will be decided.  Their dads fought and won W.W.II and they may not find enough pride in American greatness in Obama's speech. 

Six weeks from now, the European trip will matter not at all in the settling of the vote  --except that it deepens the conviction on the part of many that Obama really does believe that he is a uniquely gifted figure on the world stage.  Given how very little he has acccomplished in his public life, this pride bordering on arrogance could become a story line in the fall.



Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:31 AM
Obama's incredible response to the unchallengeable truth that the surge has worked is analyzed by Pete Wehner:

In an interview yesterday with Senator Obama, ABC’s Terry Moran listed just a few of the by now seemingly endless data points demonstrating that the so-called surge, which Obama opposed at the time it was announced, is a success. Moran then asked this (excellent) question: Knowing what you know now, would you support the surge?â€

Obama’s answer was, “No.â€

This must surely rank as among the most misinformed, ideological, and reckless statements by a presidential candidate in modern times. The McCain campaign should do everything they can to make Obama pay a high price for it. That one word answer, “No,†should be advertised in bright neon lights. It should become Exhibit A that Obama not only doesn’t have the “judgment to lead;†he has now supplied us with evidence that few people possess judgment as flawed as his.

Even hard core Obamians have to recognize that their candidate is demonstrating a disregard for the victory unfolding in Iraq that troubles all of our allies in the war and alarms the Iraqi people.  A president blinkered by ideology to huge, important truths is not cut out to be leader of the U.S. much less the West in a time of war. 

When I wrote "Letter To A Young Obama Supporter," I knew it would be hard to persuade younger voters that Obama was not the transcendant political figure he was billed as.  Obama's stubborn refusal to accept the reality of success in Iraq is just the most recent evidence that he is very much the standard-issue politician clinging to rhetoric that has been eclipsed by facts, just as opposition to drilling on the outer continental shelf has become absurd in the days of oil above $125 a barrel.  Had Obama said anything to indicate that he'd been wrong to oppose the surge, I think he could have demonstrated a refreshing-to-young-voters candor about the ability to make mistakes and learn from them, but he chose to play it safe with his hard-left, retreat-at-any-cost base.' Obama is making it very easy for Senator Mccain to point to his inexperience, and the riskiness of sending such a hard-left ideologue to the Oval Office.

I think the Obamamentum has slowed, that the European tour is oversold as a big moment for Obama, and that a competitive race will get very close indeed.  Even if you don't want to shell out $6 for a pamphlet for a young friend committed to Obama, order a year of Townhall magazine for yourself, and get one for free as well as a copy of Andrew McCarthy's superb new book, Willful Blindness.


Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 1:31 AM

When Senator McCain announces the name of his running mate, he will get the undivided attention of the country for about two minutes, and the introduction will be played again and again for weeks.  Thus I hope he opens the announcement this way:

As you can see, I have asked ______ to join me in the task of governing this great nation, and in governing it from a belief in its greatness, not in its guilt.  Together we are going to lead this nation into a second American century, one even greater than the last, one that builds on our great Constitutional order and our long standing commitment to freedom at home and its expansion around the world.

When I made this decision --perhaps the most important decision any president can make as so much potentially hangs on the individual one-heartbeat away from the Oval Office, I had to put politics aside.  Many unpaid advisors in the media wanted me to think about putting this state being in play, or that demographic being mobilized.  But I had to think about the country first --who could step in and step up if needed.

_________ is that individual.  I will tell you why in a moment, but let me underscore what the voters should take away from this announcement.

My Administration will be run by seasoned executives with the capacity to make hard choices and to get things done.  This is not the time for amateurs, and American Idol needs to stay on television, not in the government.  We won't be interested in pleasing the press or scoring political points.  These are very dangerous times, and the threat from our enemies, though forgotten by many and downplayed by others, is real and in some respects growing.  Our economy is strong but buffeted by the price of oil, and our entitlement programs and our spending addiction put us on a collision course with fiscal reality.

We have to change the way we do business in Washington.  We have to be serious about the problems in front of us.  We have to be prepared to make hard choices and do difficult things.  We have to act, and do so in the best interests of all Americans, not this or that special interest group of trial lawyers, or Hollywood elites, or public employee unions.

Here's the bottom line: As my running mate I have selected an individual far better prepared to be president than my opponent is.  ________ is ready to be vice president on day one and president if the need ever arose.  _____ has the experience in executive decision making that is necessary to avoid terrible mistakes than can cost lives and shake economies.  And, crucially, _______ believes in this country's essential greatness and essential goodness.  Together we are going to cross this country reminding its voters that we cannot set sail to our fears, as Ronald Reagan used to say.  We believe in the future, we believe in our ability to defend ourselves and our friends around the globe, and we believe that we can meet the essential challenge of finding the energy we need top fuel the growth that will benefit not just America but the entire globe.



Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Posted by: Donald Kochan at 12:58 AM
A very interesting and enllightening book by Don Corace, "Government Pirates," exposes the methods and means by which the government can use its eminent domain or regulatory powers to diminish or take our private property rights, and the impact on property owners -- especially post-Kelo.  His perspective and stories come as a developer "In the trenches" not just one of us eggheads in the ivory tower.

Government Pirates: The Assault on Private Property Rights--and How We Can Fight It

There is little chance for serious takings reform, but if there is any hope it will come from books like this one.  The pirates are coming and we need to figure out if there is any way to save the ship.

I've had a few thoughts on the subject of eminent domain and regulatory takings abuse and some of them can be downloaded at the cites below:

Donald J. Kochan, "Public Use" and the Independent Judiciary: Condemnation in an Interest-Group Perspective, 3 Texas Rev. L. & Pol. 49 (1998).

Donald J. Kochan, Reforming the Law of Takings in Michigan, A Mackinac Center Report (April 1996).

Yes, both articles are a litlle dated but, frankly, not much is changing in takings law or the political incentive structure regarding eminent domain, which is all the more reason for pessimism -- or alternatively ALL the more reason for an enhanced campaign.  The train left the station a long time ago -- is there a way to switch the track?

Also listen in to the Hugh Hewitt Show archives here for a conversation on takings between myself, Professor Matthew Parlow, and Hugh.





Sunday, July 20, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 2:44 AM
Lots of hand-wringing on the right over the dispatch of a State department senior official, William Burns, to meet with senior Iranian officials in Geneva.  Seems like a necessary "last chance" offer to me, and Iran has apparently rejected it:

 

A U.S. decision to bend policy and sit down with Iran at nuclear talks fizzled Saturday, with Iran stonewalling Washington and five other world powers on their call to freeze uranium enrichment.

In response, the six gave Iran two weeks to respond to their demand, setting the stage for a new round of U.N. sanctions.

Iran's refusal to consider suspending enrichment was an indirect slap at the United States, which had sent Undersecretary of State William Burns to the talks in hopes the first-time American presence would encourage Tehran into making concessions.

Officials and diplomats refused to characterize the timeframe as an ultimatum, but it appeared clear that Iran now has a de-facto deadline to show flexibility.



The Bush Administration has done everything a superpower can do except use military action.  Iran's mullahs come to the conclusion that the U.S. and Israel either will not or cannot stop their nuclear ambitions.  If strikes are launched against the mullahs' nuclear facilities, the U.S. will have tried every avenue to stop the program without resort to bombing. but Iran is an outlaw regime and it does not care a bit what the world demands of it.




Friday, July 18, 2008
Posted by: Donald Kochan at 12:36 PM
Obama wants the Brandenburg Gate as a backdrop and political prop.  See Charles Krauthammer's column in the Washington Post today.

When will Obama just acknowledge, "I know people who know people who knew John F. Kennedy, and I am no John F. Kennedy"?  Audacity dominates his every step.


Thursday, July 17, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 5:36 PM
CNN's Situation Room just carried a report that electricity costs in Maryland and D.C. have soared 46% in the past two years, and that "experts" predict widespread shortages of electricity across the country in just three years.

Given the ability to build new nuclear power, plants there is no shortage more easily remedied than that of electricity.  But building the nuclear plants requires political will and legislation clearing the regulatory hurdles out of the way.  Let's be clear: This is another Democrat-made shortage, and like the Congress-induced bans on producing oil that have led to the soaring price of gas, if you want more energy pain on the electricity front, just vote for Obama and his colleagues on the Hill.  They have no intention of doing anything about the need for more energy in all of its forms.

Their solution remains the same: You are to shut up, sit in your dark houses and sweat.  Deindustrialization is the Democrats' only plan.


Thursday, July 17, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 5:14 PM
What in the world is Obama talking about? Here's what he said:

We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

When the Democratic nominee calls for a huge, new national "security force" working domestically, shouldn't someone in the MSM ask him what he means?

Ed Morrissey has the details, including the MSM's refusal to report the amazing call for a DoD-sized "national security force."

Obama represents the most inexperienced, risky major party nominee in American political history, and he is demonstrating that with at best inscrutable off-the-cuff rhetoric on a daily basis, but the MSM bigs are covering for him.  Astonishing.

OK, Obama apologists, what's your messiah talking about here? Let the spinning begin.


Thursday, July 17, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 4:48 PM
THE PRESIDENT:  Archbishop Wuerl, Father O'Connell, Mr. Vice President, members of the Cabinet and my administration, members of Congress, distinguished guests; most importantly, the Snow family, Jill, Robbie, Kendall, Kristi and Jim, and other family members; former colleagues of Tony.  Laura and I are privileged to join you today to pay our final respects to a cherished friend. 

     Tony Snow was a man of uncommon decency and compassion.  He was a devoted husband, a proud and loving father, an adoring son, a beloved colleague, and a wonderful role model and friend. 
Read More...




Thursday, July 17, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 11:27 AM
From Ryan Lizza's piece in the New Yorker (HT: Jake Tapper):

Obama’s response to the event was published on September 19th in the Hyde Park Herald:

Even as I hope for some measure of peace and comfort to the bereaved families, I must also hope that we as a nation draw some measure of wisdom from this tragedy. Certain immediate lessons are clear, and we must act upon those lessons decisively. We need to step up security at our airports. We must reexamine the effectiveness of our intelligence networks. And we must be resolute in identifying the perpetrators of these heinous acts and dismantling their organizations of destruction.

We must also engage, however, in the more difficult task of understanding the sources of such madness. The essence of this tragedy, it seems to me, derives from a fundamental absence of empathy on the part of the attackers: an inability to imagine, or connect with, the humanity and suffering of others. Such a failure of empathy, such numbness to the pain of a child or the desperation of a parent, is not innate; nor, history tells us, is it unique to a particular culture, religion, or ethnicity. It may find expression in a particular brand of violence, and may be channeled by particular demagogues or fanatics. Most often, though, it grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair.

We will have to make sure, despite our rage, that any U.S. military action takes into account the lives of innocent civilians abroad. We will have to be unwavering in opposing bigotry or discrimination directed against neighbors and friends of Middle Eastern descent. Finally, we will have to devote far more attention to the monumental task of raising the hopes and prospects of embittered children across the globe—children not just in the Middle East, but also in Africa, Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and within our own shores.  




Thursday, July 17, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:20 AM
I interviewed AEI's Fred Kagan yesterday, who has just returned from an 11 -day trip around Iraq.  The entire transcript is here and the podcast is here.

I asked Kagan about media and political debate in Iraq as the country approaches the crucial provincial elections:

HH: Now talk to us a little bit, we take so granted our free political press and the benefits it gives us, and the pleasure it gives us, and the outlet it provides us. What’s the media like in Iraq right now? 

FK: Oh, the media is ferocious in Iraq. I mean, there are lots of media outlets, there’s free press. Most of the outlets, as in America, reflect one view or another, or one party or another. But there are enough of them that, and Iraqis can get them all, that they can get a pretty full picture. And there’s very vibrant political discourse, and there’s lots of arguments and name calling, and all the kind of stuff that we would be very familiar with. But the other thing about Iraq that’s found is when you fly over an Iraqi village, and it’s four mud huts on the ground, two of them will have satellite dishes. 

 

Americans tend to take for granted the joys and benefits of a completely free media, one in which the temptation to political violence is always held down by the opportunity to organize and vent.  One of the greatest gifts delivered to Iraq by the overthrow of Saddam was this freedom to argue and decry, inveigh and satirize.  Those who want with Obama to bolt on the Iraqis are indifferent to amazing march of freedom in the former tyranny, and cannot be a friend of the Iraqi people or the broader Arab world which is watching a multi-party democracy take hold and deepen its roots.

Read the entire Kagan interview.  He, Kimberly Kagan and Jack Keane are owed an immense set of thank-yous for the work they have done to persuade the Administration and the country to save Iraq and to publicize the unfolding victory there.




Thursday, July 17, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 9:05 AM

Republican presidential nominee to be John McCain walks in Denver in March with a possible running mate, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney

The Los Angeles Times'Andrew Malcom summarizes the reporting of the Boston Globe's  Michael Kranish on the prospect of a McCain-Romney ticket, including the prospect that Senator McCain might skip public funding if he picks Romney as a running mate:

The Globe.com article quoted legal experts who said it appears that if McCain, like the Democratic candidate Barack Obama, reversed his position and opted out of federal campaign financing, Romney as a running mate could donate or loan the campaign an unlimited amount of his own fortune.
The news that Obama gathered in $52 million in June underscores the need for Team McCain to choose a Veep with an eye not just on the most important qualification --the ability to become president on short notice-- but also with an emphasis on the ability and willingness to campaign hard (no John Edwards), to put states in play (for Romney, that means Michigan, New Hampshire, Colorado and Nevada; for Tim Pawlenty, Minnesota and Wisconsin) and especially to raise money from established networks.

Though some commentary asserted Senator McCain would wait until after Obama selected his running mate, the pressing need to keep the funding gap somewhat close argues for an early selection.  Whether Pawlenty or Romney or someone else, it just makes it much easier to raise the crucial funds with both members of the ticket working the country's donors.

Romney's "Ms"--the message on the economy, his and his supporters' money, the Mormons and the enthusiasm they would bring to the campaign, especially in Mormon-heavy states like Colorado and Nevada, and of course Romney's ties to his home state Michigan-- make the case for choosing Romney very strong.  An early selection would give the campaign an huge lift throughout the summer, one that could keep the already lower-than-expected Obama lead in the single digits.


Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 7:30 PM
Bruce Herschensohn's new novel is a thriller set in an America besieged by Islamist sleeper cells.  It is also a thoughtful meditation on how thew West has lost its sense of alarm after 9/11, and the consequences of such complacency.

Above Empyrean: A Novel of the Final Days of the War Against Islamist Terrorism


[image]
Friday, July 25, 2008
Obama and the Don't Drill Democrats
[image][image]
[image]
The National Defense
National Defense Rundown for July 19th Show
[image]Listen Now
[image]Podcast
[image]
Young America's Foundation
Michelle Easton: The Failures of Feminism
[image]Listen Now
[image]Podcast
[image]
BreakPoint
No Life, No Justice: Sanctity of Life Is Foundational
[image]Listen Now
[image]Podcast
[image]
Support Young Life
Archives
Blog Search:





You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser