Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Contents
[edit] Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Sex work
Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Please RSVP to Purity Ball
You are cordially invited to join us at Purity Ball, to assist with its expansion. Please come. Whatever404 (talk) 12:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Renaming of Woman on top (sex position)
I have proposed that this page be renamed. The discussion can be found here Ctjf83Talk 18:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] New page of relevance here.
I have created a page, List of sexology organizations, which might be of interest to folks here. Please feel free to add to it appropriate organizations. I hope also that that list encourages the creation of WP articles covering those organzations themselves.
— James Cantor (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you; yes, I think you might be right. I am changing them over, but it leaves a bunch of redlinks. It's making me realize only now that pages for these organizations should be created. Any help from interested editors would be appreciated.
— James Cantor (talk) 20:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Need reviewers and watchers for nocturnal emission
For a long time I've been keeping an eye on nocturnal emission, but in the times when I couldn't commit as much effort to watching it, many questionable edits fell through the cracks. Today I reverted an unjustified section deletion that was two months old. Additionally, anonymous editors have frequently edited the article to refer to a variety of popular unsubstantiated myths about nocturnal emissions, particularly with regard to their cause. Unfortunately, there are many misleading sources out there on the subject that some of our editors find persuasive. It'd be really great if I could get a few more people to review this article for correctness and bias, and help to watch it for vandalism. Thanks! Dcoetzee 23:39, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Homosexual transsexual GA reassessment
Homosexual transsexual has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Malkinann (talk) 23:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
