Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Style issues
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for comment (Redirected from Template:RFCstyle list)
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) Should dates of birth and dates of death at the top of articles be linked? Template talk:Navbox Which of these two versions of Navbox template formatting do you prefer?
Manually-added entries:
User:MSJapan/Freemasonry MOS‎ I'm worried that this is becoming a proxy to put a certain view of Freemasonry as the norm across Wikipedia. It also seems redefine policies, particularly WP:BLP (by extending it to all people, living and dead). JASpencer (talk) 22:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
I think that the wiki layout is very good. I like the way you can do what you want User: Ollie Orton
WT:MOSNUM#RfC: Linking of dates of birth and death - Is it desirable for dates of birth and death at the top of biography articles to be linked to the corresponding "day" and "year" pages; or should such links be removed? -- Jheald (talk) 09:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
To add a discussion to RFC:
Add {{RFCstyle| section=section name !! reason=a short summary of the discussion !! time= ~~~~~ }} to the talk page section where the discussion will be held. Mind the exclamation marks! Do not use pipe symbols to separate the parameters. Warning:
! and = will not work, as they are used to separate parameters. {{ and }} might work outside of the time parameter. The vertical pipe (|) works again. To add an entry manually, click the "add a discussion" link. On the top of the list, note the name of the page and a short summary of the discussion. For more information, see Wikipedia:Requests for comments. Report problems to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comments.For more information, see User:RFC bot
