Ph: 681634892

Talk:Implementation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Bold text[[[Link title] == Headline text

[edit] Image:Headline text[[Image:[Example.jpg][[Link titleBold text]]]]

==

]]

This article is within the scope of Computing WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to computers and computing. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

I am interested in success coaching and training, and talk about 'implementation' as meaning 'putting into action what you know needs to be done'. For example, if you buy a training program on marketing, you want to implement what you learn or you've wasted your money. The word 'implementation' has an IT connection. What definition would you put on 'implementation' as I mean it?

68.163.48.92 (talk) 18:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


I noticed alot about the implementation hasnt been done :/

[edit] All politics is divided into three parts? ;)

The Implementation page stated: " his process consists of rule-making, rule- administration and rule-adjudication. Factors impacting implementation include the legislative intent, the administrative capacity of the implementing bureaucracy, interest group activity and op "

Is it true that political implementation is a system having only three funcs, those being make{R}. administer(R), and adjuducate(R) ?

Is R the radius, the radians, the 'trigger-no-metric' function? As in, the "new angle", wherein each particular is "new" as compared to all existing particulars?

Make(R) presumably is the generator of the objects of the category 'political' ? Or, in functional programming, maybe it is the generator of the functions rather than of the objects?

Polling particulars in order to arrive at an explicitation of an explication of politics might explain why polling is sometimes considered a pollitical thing to do? Does polling contract to poling, like it would in G. Spencer Brown's laws of form?

Knotwork 00:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

How do you rate mobile version of this page?

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser