Talk:Doorway page

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Content Rich Pages = Doorways?!

"More sophisticated doorway pages, called Content Rich Doorways, are designed to gain high placement in search results without using redirection. They incorporate at least a minimum amount of design and navigation similar to the rest of the site to provide a more human-friendly and natural appearance. Visitors are offered standard links as calls to action."

This description is very vague, undefined and noninformative about the criteria for labeling a page as doorway. Majority of pages could fit the description above. A page that has rich content, standard links and normal (cheap) design and navigation is defined as doorway?!

It is defined as a "content rich doorway" page because the copy is written for a specific keyword or query, and the page is intended only to persuade visitors to click through to deeper content (usually a transaction of some kind).Michael Martinez (talk) 23:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] spamming again

I removed a spam link that pointed to a poorly-written spam page. Firewareosba 22:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Meta-jacking

The folliwng text on "meta-jacking" was removed, because a Google search for it (in realtion to doorway pages) only gave results for copies of this artcile.

You could also "meta jack" a webpage. It's simply taking meta tags from a another high ranking page to yours, but it will not guarantee a high ranking. Cloaking is also a form of doorway pages technique.

[edit] Russian translation

I added a link to a Russian translation taken from the Doorway article, which I intend to clear and redirect to this article. However, I don't speak Russian, and given the (low) quality of the rest of the Doorway article, I would like someone who speaks Russian to confirm that the article I'm linking to is in fact a translation of this article. Thanks! Ehn 16:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] External link spamming

With all due respect this page's external links is becoming home to major wikispamming in an uncontrolled level (what do you expect from a Black SEO subject). I believe the content is sufficiently covered and I believe only Reference links with proper reference to the page from proper pages should be allowed in so I will be deleting the External page section of this page. Thank you and I hope you support me in this decision. MKS 05:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Two years later and they're still at it. --Ardonik.talk()* 06:42, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

How do you rate mobile version of this page?

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser