Ph: 2418215132

Talk:Carole Migden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is part of WikiProject California, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of California. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of the San Francisco Bay Area WikiProject, a collaborative effort to build on Wikipedia's coverage of San Francisco and the Bay Area. If you would like to learn more or get involved, please visit our project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

Source for 'ghost vote' text restoration: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/09/07/EDGLPEJAAR1.DTL 24.18.215.132 00:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

"Then again, at least we know Midgen's heart is in the right place; like the cleaned-up drug addict invited to tell schoolkids to stay off the dope, surely this morning more than others Midgen felt all the more confident in having voted the way she did. VIA: Engadget" Is this neccesary?

Who the hell wrote this article? Her mother? MKING007 22:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Driving incident and brewing edit war

Following Senator Migden's recent adventures on I-80, there's a back and forth going on between those providing information about the case and anonymous IP-only editors redacting that information. I've got a watch on this page and I suggest that others do so as well. Tommythegun 23:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV problems

All the criticism that was previously listed in the article by my last edit (in July 2007) needs to readded in a reduced format, with NPOV#Let_the_facts_speak_for_themselves. The whole section "accomplishments" needs to redone. Again, let facts speak for themselves.User:calbear22 (talk) 22:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

I fixed most of these issues, but the former accomplishments section, despite being renamed, is still not NPOV.User:calbear22 (talk) 10:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
It's a lot better now, but there is still some issues. There are many instances were the facts don't speak for themselves. The article says a measure "strengths"_____ but we don't talk about what the measure actually did nor is that really what the bill summary links usually state.User:calbear22 (talk) 18:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

How do you rate mobile version of this page?

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser