Talk:Binary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Unsorted talk

The binary number system probably deserves its own article

I don't think we need a suffix (disambiguation) since binary is redirected to here. Why would do that? -- Taku 03:26 2 Jun 2003 (UTC)

"It is believed that only geeks can read binary code and/or pure object code, however this has not been verified." -- I don't know that this is very clever, or that it has a place in the article. Mkilly 20:24, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] disambig

Why isn't Binary numeral system here and every thing named after it at binary (disambiguation)? That's how most other cases like this work. --Dtcdthingy 19:53, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Disambig

I agree with Dtcdthingy Binary numeral system should be here.

I would like this to be a redirect to
OR:

_{Google results}

_{Results may include some wikipedia pages, no brakets were used for the search
Results¹ - Results for term in quotation marks
² - term with -wikipedia at the end.
I am going to redo the disambig in order of my results (if there is no article yet it will be last --Adam1213 Talk + 07:35, 6 February 2006 (UTC)}

_{Results that are stiked out are because of Ravn's edit which I agree with.
However I would like Binary numeral system to be in bold (and possibly that line). --Adam1213 Talk + 06:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)}

_{Ack and Thanks. I agree that the numeral system could be put in bold. I am neutral when it comes to ordering, mine was completely subjective.}

_{I personally would keep Binary as a disambiguation page. Many pages link here referring to the (I admit - wiktionary) definition of binary as bipartite. Redirecting all of them to binary numerals would IMHO create more confusion. -- Ravn 16:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)}

_{[edit] dualism}

_{insert link to dualism concept>? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.72.83.232 (talk) 06:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC).}