Talk:1995
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is part of WikiProject Years, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Years. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Contents
heres a thought for you all, june 5, 1995, first Bose Einstien condensate achieved. hey its just a thought but i think that is notable don't you?
[edit] Format
26-June-2007: The years 1900-1999 got a condensed Table of Contents after 28May07. See Talk:1950#Format (and "Talk:1950#Condensed TOC"). -Wikid77 22:53 26-June-2007
"Russia almost launches a nuclear" is that npov ?
- what mean almost launches ? who decided ? to what extend the Russians where on alert ?
Ericd Germans are CRAZY! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.227.156.120 (talk) 22:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 2004 page layout years
There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout.
For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at).
Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done.
Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically).
talk--BozMo 13:41, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
I removed a reference to the Nov 22 Earthquake being possibly thought of as "Divine" anger at some EU-Israel treaty. I think if this is true then the event should have its own page and a discussion of what happened, along with external references. I'm fairly certain that this page is meant only as a summary rather than a detailed examination of the subject. One Salient Oversight 04:26, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
There has been a bit of discussion on Talk:2005, having notable parents does not make someone's birth inherently notable. I hadn't the heart to delete Dolly the sheep though. PatGallacher 11:28, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
I DONT GET WHY THEY LET U DO ANYTHING TO THIS PAGE
[edit] Gotta cite my addition.
[edit] January-June Births
What on Earth happened here? Hallpriest9 (Talk | Archive) 05:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've fixed it. In the future please just delete any redlink additions as nn. Carl.bunderson (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Windows95BOXSHOT.png
The image Image:Windows95BOXSHOT.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
-
That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article. That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:53, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
