Synoptic Gospels

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from Synoptic gospels)
Jump to: navigation, search

The synoptic gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke are so called because they share a common view point.[1] They are the first three books of the Christian New Testament. The synoptic problem concerns the nature and origin of the literary relationship among the accounts.

[edit] Differences with the Gospel of John

The Gospel of John differs significantly in theme, content, time duration, order of events, and style, reflecting a Christian tradition different from that of the synoptics.[2]

Some differences:

Item Matthew, Mark, Luke John
First event mentioned Jesus' birth (Matthew), Jesus' baptism (Mark), Foretelling of the birth of John the Baptist (Luke) Creation of the world
Authors: according to conservative Christians Apostle Matthew; Mark and Luke, co-workers of Paul Apostle John
Authors: according to liberal Christians Unknown authors 2 or more unknown authors
Virgin birth Mentioned in Matt, Luke Not explicitly mentioned
Jesus as Son of God... From the time of his birth or baptism From the time that the universe was created
Description of Jesus Jesus' humanity emphasized[citation needed] Jesus' deity emphasized[citation needed]
Jesus baptism Described Not Mentioned
Preaching style Brief one-liners; parables Essay format
Jesus teaches as: A sage[citation needed] A philosopher and mystic[citation needed]
Exorcism A main function of his ministry None performed
True parables Many None
Theme of his teaching: Kingdom of God[citation needed] Jesus himself. Kingdom of God is a background theme.[citation needed]
Jesus' theology Deviated little from 1st century CE liberal Judaism. Similar to beliefs taught by Hillel.[citation needed] Largely independent of Judaism and in opposition to much of its teaching.[citation needed]
Response expected from the reader Respond to God's will as expressed in the Mosaic law[citation needed] Respond to Jesus as the definitive expression of God's will or revelation[citation needed]
Exorcism of demons Many None
Involvement with the poor and suffering Focus of his ministry Rarely mentioned
Involvement with Scribes (Jewish teachers) 26 references to scribes, who are puzzled and angered by Jesus' teachings No references at all.[citation needed]
Miracles performed by Jesus Many "nature miracles," healings, and exorcisms Few; all "nature miracles"
Jesus references to himself Rare Focus of the gospel, including the many "I am" sayings
Basis of personal salvation Good works, helping the poor, sick, imprisoned, and needy[citation needed] Belief in Jesus as the Son of God[citation needed]
Duration of ministry 1 year 3 years
Location of ministry Mainly Galilee Mainly Judea, near Jerusalem
Clearing of the money-changers from the Temple Near the end of his ministry Near the start of his ministry
Date of the Last Supper Passover eve Night before Passover eve
Ceremonial event at the Last Supper: Communal meal Foot washing
Who carried the cross? Simon Jesus
Visitors to the tomb on Sunday with Mary Magdalene? One or more additional women None; Mary Magdalene went alone
Who was present in the tomb? One angel or two men Two angels
Burial shroud A single piece of cloth Multiple pieces of cloth, as was the Jewish practice at the time. (John 20:5-7)
Jesus' first post-resurrection appearance to disciples At Emmaus or Galilee Jerusalem

However, the origin of the concept, per se, stems from much earlier: As early as the 4th century, these three books were "seen together with the same eyes", starting with the Church historian Eusebius of Caesarea, who had devised a method that enabled scholars to find parallel texts.

In the 5th century, Augustine of Hippo developed what was later known as the Augustinian hypothesis, which proposed why these three gospels were so similar. In this view, the gospels were written in order of presentation, but that Mark was Matthew's "lackey and abbreviator"[citation needed] and that Luke drew from both sources (see illustration).

This view went unchallenged until the late 18th century[citation needed], when Anton Büsching posited that Luke came first, and Mark conflated Luke and Matthew.

In 1774 Johann Jakob Griesbach published his landmark parallel study, calling it a Synopsis. Over the subsequent years, he developed what became known as the Griesbach hypothesis, and now called the two-gospel hypothesis, or simply "2GH". This hypothesis maintains the primacy of Matthew, but proposes that Luke is directly based on it, while Mark is based on both (see illustration).

Since then, other hypotheses have been proffered in order to deal with the synoptic problem. These hypotheses include the Ur-Gospel hypothesis (1778), the two-source hypothesis (1838, 1863), Farrer hypothesis (1955), the Lindsey hypothesis (1963), Jerusalem School hypothesis (1973), and the Logia Translation hypothesis (1998).[3]

The widely accepted modern scholastic understandings (the two-source and four-source hypotheses) agree[citation needed] that Mark's Gospel was the first written, and published in Rome in the early 60s AD. This Gospel was independently available, along with other verbal traditions, to Matthew and Luke, both of whom were writing in the 70's and 80's.[citation needed]

Yet other material is common to Luke and Matthew that is absent from Mark. The name given to this material is Q document, abbreviated to Q (see illustration).

The question of the origin of the remainder of the content of each of the latter two synoptics remains an open one, yet the name commonly given[citation needed] to sources unique to these authors is L for Luke, or M for Matthew. In the culture at the time, it was very common for communities to preserve and pass on important stories and evidence by word of mouth from person to person.[citation needed]

[edit] Dating

Scholars[who?] generally date the synoptic gospels as having been written after the epistles of Paul and before the gospel according to John, thus between 60 and 115 AD. As to the specific dates for each book, this largely depends on (or supports) the particular hypothesis used to account for the books' textual relationship.

[edit] Similarities

Main article: synoptic problem

The relationship between the texts is the subject of the synoptic problem, which essentially seeks answers to the question of why the texts are so similar. At times the tests use exactly the same wording and mention the same sequence of events, despite the fact that other intervening events must have happened, even if they were mundane events such as Jesus sleeping or people gossiping about him.

The synoptic gospels all tell the story of Jesus, proclaiming him the Son of God, the Son of Man, the Messiah (Christ), the judge of the future apocalypse. The synoptic gospels start either with Jesus' birth or his baptism and conclude with the empty tomb and resurrection appearances, though some texts of Mark end at the empty tomb (see Mark 16). In these gospels, Jesus cures diseases, exorcises demons, forgives sins, and displays dominion over nature. All the gospels also give Jesus as omniscent and omnipresent, thus he is depicted as God incarnate on earth and knows the secret thoughts and past of others, speaks "with authority," calls God his own Father and says that the Father had handed over to him "all things."

[edit] See also

[edit] References

^ "synoptic". Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. 2nd ed. 1989. ^ "USCCB - NAB - John - Introduction". Retrieved on 2008-10-21. ^ "Synoptic Problem Home Page". Retrieved on 2007-07-08.

[edit] External links


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

How do you rate mobile version of this page?

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser