Quality
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In the vernacular, quality can mean a high degree of excellence (“a quality productâ€), a degree of excellence or the lack of it (“work of average qualityâ€), or a property of something (“the addictive quality of alcoholâ€).[1] Distinct from the vernacular, the subject of this article is the business interpretation of quality.
Contents
[edit] Variations of a business definition
Business has tried to define quality in a producer-consumer context, with the following variations:
- a. "Uniformity around a target value."[8] The idea is to lower the standard deviation in outcomes, and to keep the range of outcomes to a certain number of standard deviations, with rare exceptions.
- b. "The loss a product imposes on society after it is shipped."[9] This definition of quality is based on a more comprehensive view of the production system.
- a. the characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs;
- b. a product or service free of deficiencies."[5]
The common element of the business definitions is that the quality of a product or service refers to the perception of the degree to which the product or service meets the customer's expectations. Quality has no specific meaning unless related to a specific function and/or object. Quality is a perceptual, conditional and somewhat subjective attribute.
[edit] Improvement of quality
Many techniques and concepts, often overlapping, have evolved to improve product or service quality, including:
W. Edwards Deming, concentrating on "the efficient production of the quality that the market expects,"[11] linked quality and management: "Costs go down and productivity goes up as improvement of quality is accomplished by better management of design, engineering, testing and by improvement of processes."[12]
[edit] Market sector prespectives
In the manufacturing industry it is commonly stated that “Quality drives productivity.†Improved productivity is a source of greater revenues, employment opportunities and technological advances. However, this has not been the case historically, and in the early 19th century it was recognised that some markets,such as those in Asia, preferred cheaper products to those of quality[13] Most discussions of quality refer to a finished part, wherever it is in the process. Inspection, which is what quality insurance usually means, is historical, since the work is done. The best way to think about quality is in process control. If the process is under control, inspection is not necessary.
However, there is one characteristic of modern quality that is universal. In the past, when we tried to improve quality, typically defined as producing fewer defective parts, we did so at the expense of increased cost, increased task time, longer cycle time, etc. We could not get fewer defective parts and lower cost and shorter cycle times, and so on. However, when modern quality techniques are applied correctly to business, engineering, manufacturing or assembly processes, all aspects of quality - customer satisfaction and fewer defects/errors and cycle time and task time/productivity and total cost, etc.- must all improve or, if one of these aspects does not improve, it must at least stay stable and not decline. So modern quality has the characteristic that it creates AND-based benefits, not OR-based benefits.
The most progressive view of quality is that it is defined entirely by the customer or end user and is based upon that person's evaluation of his or her entire customer experience. The customer experience is the aggregate of all the touch points that customers have with the company's product and services, and is by definition a combination of these. For example, any time one buys a product one forms an impression based on how it was sold, how it was delivered, how it performed, how well it was supported etc.
[edit] Citations and notes
You can improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate.
