There Is A Connection Between 59 Percent Voter Turnout And Four 36 Day Elections In A Row
October 15, 2008 · 8 Comments

Voter turnout has been taking a nosedive over the past fifteen years because 1. the Canada Elections Act put a 36-day minimum on campaigning, and 2. the federal parties figured out that if you have $50 million dollars to spend over an election campaign it’s better value to do it over 36 days instead of 70.
Just twenty years ago voter turnout was 75.3%. The Liberal Party called elections in 1997, 2000, 2004 and 2006, all of which ran the absolute bare minimum of thirty-six days. Voter turnout since 1997 has fallen below 70% each year until this years 59% turnout (1997: 67%; 2000: 61.2%, 2004: 60.9%, 2006: 64.7%).
What has increased over the same amount of time, however, is ideology over policy as election strategy. Instead of having reasoned debate and time to understand what the policies are, Canadian politics has been reduced to leaders literally accusing each other of wanting to destroy the country. In all four elections, including the one the Liberals lost in 2004, the only platform that mattered was “hidden agenda”. As in “they” have one, and only the “I” can keep you safe from it.
The issue in all four elections was the same: fear. There were no substantial reasons for the 1997, 2000 and 2004 elections, for example, other than the ruling governments believed the opposition parties were in enough disarray an election victory was guaranteed. And they were short because longer elections left too many variables, while the shortest possible election meant more weight to platitudes and one-liners.
Because there’s no time to lay out new policies, or discuss and even change them. Shorter election times means spending more time pre-election demonizing your opponent so we “get†their message in the short campaign. Shorter election times mean ideologues are given the opportunity to set the agenda, and with such a low minimum keeping the electorate as uninvolved as possible has become a strategy.
Since the 1993 election Canadians have decided the makeup of our government based on no platforms, no serious debate and at the whim of whichever special interest group can whip up a concert overnight.
Before the 1993 election — then the shortest at 47 days, and with a 69.6% turnout — Canada had some of the largest voter turnouts of any democracy. Now, after four consecutive 36-day elections, we don’t. Increase the minimum, force the parties to defend their platform over a significant time, and give people time to figure out what’s going on and the numbers will go back up.
.
* This is mostly in response to some comments on Thorora’s blog. She’s thinking of moving to Sweden, so I thought I’d offer an alternative because, really, Sweden sucks.
.

.
→ 8 CommentsCategories: CSN:AFU Aboot Canada · Canada · Canadian News · Canadian Politics · Entertainment
Thanksgiving An Election And Health Care
October 13, 2008 · No Comments

It’s Thanksgiving in Canada today, and tomorrow we vote for a new federal government. Election dates in Canada are selected by our Prime Minister whenever he’s ready to give’r so the timing is a coincidence, but taking a day off to think things over with family and friends seems like something which should be written into the Elections Act.
Canada’s elections are not events which normally get a lot of “Press” in other countries. And I’m not sure why they should be, other than Canadians watch a lot of foreign news and we like it when our name pops up.
Unless there’s a referendum being held in Quebec about whether they should leave the Federation, selecting a new Prime Minister and governing party usually gets a minute on BBC World and a few American national shows. Otherwise, politically, we’re just another face in the photo taken at the end of the annual G8 conference.
Sigh… yes, as one of only a very few country’s with a GDP over a trillion dollars ($1.4T) Canada* has one of the largest economies on the planet. I think sometimes we even forget that.
The “economy” turned into an issue during this election, of course. But not ours… the Canadian economy is not being substantially effected by the credit and mortgage crisis in Europe and America. However, because we receive a substantial amount of American news programming and Canadian news outlets cover American and European issues all those 72-point bold headlines made it seem as though every second Canadian homeowner was eating dog food and living on a street corner.
But that’s politics — take a headline and turn it into your cause, not policy.
Setting health care policy is not within the jurisdiction of the federal government, for example, but it becomes a political issue in every federal election because it’s easy for whomever is in opposition to accuse the current government of wanting your children to get cancer. And as they do every year, so did they again this year.
But beyond supplying some cash every once in a while the Constitution says the ten provincial governments are in charge of funding and setting health care policy in Canada, not the federal government.
The problem with a system as retarded as this, of course, is each “Canadian” only gets to vote for one of those ten provincial governments. So drugs and tests made free and available to me in Ontario are expensive and unavailable in other provinces.
This is something we mostly ignore. This year the federal opposition parties decided the health care issue they most wanted to talk about was the shortage of family doctors in Canada.
Family doctors in Canada are considered by the Provinces, in a very convoluted manner, to be businesses… basically contractors working for the Province. So between 1991 and 2000 the Provinces decided the Doctor Industry was too expensive and there were too many of them.
To break the back of Big Doctor the Provinces limited enrolment to their medical schools, reduced enrolment for foreign students by almost 15%, made it harder for graduates from one province to work in another, then made it harder for doctors to get paid and actually cut salaries.
As a result there has been an actual net loss of Canadian doctors to the United States… there are more than 12,000 Canadian doctors working in the United States today thanks to those various improvements to the Canadian Health Care “industry”. Coincidentally most analysts will tell you Canada is currently short 12,000 to 15,000 doctors.
According to a research paper published in 2007 by the Canadian Medical Association Journal, “unlike people in the United States, nearly all Canadians (97%) [in the 1990's] ha[d] a family physician; however, nearly 1 in 3 Canadians surveyed in 2002 reported difficulty finding a regular family physician or seeing their family physician when needed. Over half of Canadians surveyed in 2002 said it was “very†or “somewhat†difficult to see a specialist. Access problems are worse for rural Canadians.”
According to the current opposition all of this, of course, is the fault of the current government which is made up of a political party which only formed a few years ago.
I live in rural Canada and I have a family doctor. I guess I lucked out because he stopped taking new patients a few months after he took me on. But it still takes three months to get an appointment.
The entire health care system in Canada needs to be fixed, but fixing it within the framework which exists now means getting ten Premiers from any of three main provincial political parties to agree to the changes offered by a Prime Minister none of them have any allegiance towards. And every time a Prime Minister has tried to get all ten of them around a table for any reason it degenerates quickly into a game of “lets gouge the federal government”.
Because the Premiers know the PM will be seen to be at fault for any failure, they’ll do everything they can to get as much money as they can from him, but without any promises to spend it on what they’re receiving it for. A few years ago, for example, the Federal Government gave the Provinces billions for health care, but most of the Premiers spent the money on random “infrastructure” projects.
So our federal election is being decided based on an economic crisis our banking system is unaffected by, and a provincial issue which the federal government is not allowed to interfere with under our Constitution.
It’s actually not surprising our elections don’t get covered in other countries.
.
This past weekend was Canada’s Thanksgiving. It’s a pure harvest festival, and although we do eat a lot of turkey, ham and stuffing, ours is not related to the more religious equivalent in the United States. We didn’t have Pilgrims or Puritans, we had the Voyageur and the Habitant… which meant more Tavernes and beer and less Churches and wine.
According to Wiki the actual date was set by a government proclamation in 1957 as “A Day of General Thanksgiving to Almighty God for the bountiful harvest with which Canada has been blessed… to be observed on the 2nd Monday in October.” But it goes back to 1578 when Martin Frobisher, a European explorer trying to find a northern passage to the Orient, stopped to give thanks for making it across the Atlantic.
Of course the harvest festival in Canada goes back about another 8,000 to 10,000 years but aboriginal issues, including their health care — which is actually a federal responsibility, weren’t on the agenda this election.
So this year I’m thankful my Lithium is free, for a health care system which allows me to recover in the safety net of paid disability, for the health of my family and the fact that no matter what party wins tomorrow’s election there’s no chance they can screw up this country in ways that can’t be fixed in the next one.
.
* 2007 GDP ($Trillions) of the G8 Nations plus China:
Russia: $1.2; Canada: $1.4; Italy: $2.1; France: $2.5; UK: $2.7; China: $3.2; Germany: $3.3; Japan: $4.3; USA: $13.8
.

.
→ No CommentsCategories: CSN:AFU Aboot Canada · CSN:AFU Aboot Me · Canada · Canadian News · Canadian Politics · Entertainment · Punk
Even Batman Couldn’t Save The Falling Girl In Silver City
July 29, 2008 · 4 Comments


Riding out the storm; July 16, 2008 — Photo by Me.

There’s a pivotal moment in the latest Batman movie, in fact it’s really the penultimate climax, where two boatloads of confused and panicked people have the option of either destroying the other group or being destroyed themselves.
One boat is made up of regular people, the other loaded down with men convicted of heinous crimes. Somehow, over a fifteen minute period, these two separate and unequal groups of people manage to come to the same altruistic decision to not guarantee their own safety.
However, considering what happened in the theatre lobby twenty minutes before the movie started I don’t think I’d be too cynical in saying this situation is, at best, unlikely… but really a whole lot of bullshit.
A tall, young girl stumbled through our concession line and seemed to trip over a wet-floor sign. She fell awkwardly, almost bouncing off the counter, and through another line until she slumped on the floor. She slowly pulled herself up using the counter for balance, then staggered a few steps and fell again.
→ 4 CommentsCategories: Canada · Entertainment · Movies
Tagged: Batman, The Wisdom Of Crowds
How Not To Be A Content Provider For Paedophiles And Other Basic Things You Really Need To Know About Your Online Privacy
May 28, 2008 · 4 Comments


A moth on my front steps; Sept. 14, 2007 — Photo by Me.
.
Some people have asked me some questions recently about blogging. One person in particular is planning on starting a blog and because of where they work they specifically wanted to know about how to keep a blog secret.
My response freaked them out and woke them up to the realities of the Internet because even though her identity was a secret, in less than ten minutes and using only the tiny amount of information I had access to I knew exactly where the person worked.
“Exactly” meaning not only state, city and county but also building. If I had pushed a little further I’m pretty sure I could have found their work schedule… I did that using only the information given to me by WordPress when people leave a comment on my blog, and a free Internet-based hit-counter called SiteMeter which told me the name of their Internet Service Provider.
I’m a reporter. I covered Internet privacy policy and I did it very well. I’ve interviewed, gotten to know and had drinks with the people who wrote the Canadian laws regarding Internet privacy, I’ve also interviewed Internet specialists at the FBI, RCMP, OPP and CSIS. I don’t know much about the hardware side (ROM or RAM?), but I definitely know how the system works and how your personal and private information is traded, sold and stolen.
→ 4 CommentsCategories: Blogging · Canadian News · Entertainment · Photographers · Photography · Photos · WordPress



![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm4.static.flickr.com%2F3273%2F2844477409_3871b7cf4f.jpg%3Fv%3D0)

![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsaltedlithium.files.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F04%2Fcreativecommonsdevil2.jpg)

![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm4.static.flickr.com%2F3180%2F2678647151_0ca6909eba_m.jpg)

![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm4.static.flickr.com%2F3157%2F2578974355_1f95a467c4.jpg%3Fv%3D0)
![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fculturalsnafu.files.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F02%2Fculturalsnafuaboot.jpg)
![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fculturalsnafu.files.wordpress.com%2F2008%2F02%2Fculturalsnafuemail02b.jpg)
![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fculturalsnafu.files.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F06%2Fpotm-nita-225.jpg)
![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm4.static.flickr.com%2F3218%2F2934846301_e7da5c3376.jpg%3Fv%3D0)
![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm2.static.flickr.com%2F1230%2F1374659862_c6e583564f.jpg%3Fv%3D0)
![[image]](http://mowser.com/img?url=http%3A%2F%2Fculturalsnafu.files.wordpress.com%2F2007%2F04%2F000-thinkingbloggerpf8.jpg)



