[image]
Ph: 2022240238

A Piper Cub Lands in Philistia

in which Brendt waxes deep, nostalgic, or just plain weird

Archive for the 'give 'em zell' Category

fedex vs government bureaucracy

by @ Wednesday, October 8th, 2008. Filed under give 'em zell, humor (arr, arr), political rants

I have mixed feelings about Newt Gingrich. But you can’t deny that he’s a deep thinker, is good at giving illustrations that the rest of us can grok, and can be a funny guy when he wants to be. This short YouTube video shows all of those.

HT to Challies.

sometimes, too real to be funny

by @ Saturday, October 4th, 2008. Filed under give 'em zell, humor (arr, arr), movies, political rants, reviews

An American CarolAn American Carol
(2008 — Kevin Farley, Kelsey Grammer, Leslie Nielsen)

In the early 1990s, when the Dilbert comic strip was starting to get popular, what made the office humor so funny was the fact that creator Scott Adams would take a silly issue that really occurs at the office and blow it way out of proportion. Adams even unashamedly solicited incidents from fans that he could further lampoon.

However, some time ago, Dilbert ceased being funny because of such caricature. Don’t get me wrong; it’s still often funny. But the humor comes simply from Adams’ style. 21st-century corporate America is impossible to caricature anymore; it has become so unbelievable in reality, that to push its boundaries in fiction would come across with all the sense of order of a Salvador Dali painting.

If there is one cinematic failing of An American Carol, it is a parallel to concept; there are some issues that the movie tackles that are impossible to caricature, but the style sometimes doesn’t make up for that fact. Radio and TV host Glenn Beck said about the movie, “There are uproarious parts to it. And then there are some parts in which it’s obvious that the film-makers were going for laughs, but the issue was too close to reality to actually be funny.”

Case in point: The Michael Malone character (a clear spoof of “documentary“-maker Michael Moore) states, “I love America; that’s why it has to be destroyed.” A ludicrous (and somewhat funny) statement, in and of itself. But it’s an easy extrapolation of actual statements that Moore has made. Fortunately, there are enough moments of extreme caricature that save the movie from these occasions.

An American Carol was directed and co-written by David Zucker of Airplane and The Naked Gun movies. Assuming you like slapstick and sophomoric humor, these were masterpieces. Of late, Zucker has added satire to his bag of tricks, primarily in defense of conservative ideas (or perhaps more accurately, in ridicule of liberal ideas). You can check out YouTube for examples of Zucker’s comedic exposure of the asininity of negotiating with mad-men. In the movie, Zucker revisits and expands on the issues in that second video, paralleling the naivete of Neville Chamberlain with that of those today who think we can just play nice and the terrorists will leave us alone. Zucker has also written and directed some other brief anti-Democrat videos that the RNC admittedly found funny, but refused to use.

The main story of the movie is told by Zucker-movie staple Leslie Nielsen to his grandchildren at a July 4th picnic. In a parallel to Charles Dickens‘ A Christmas Carol, the main character of the story is a very bad person who meets three spirits whose visions convince him to change his ways. Paralleling Scrooge is Kevin Farley’s character, Michael Malone — as stated before, an obvious spoof on Michael Moore, down to the trademark Michigan State “S” ballcap and abundant girth. The three spirits are General George Patton (Kelsey Grammer), George Washingon (Jon Voight) and the angel of death (country music star Trace Adkins, who also appears as himself later in the movie). Malone also has a nephew (merging Bob Cratchit and Scrooge’s nephew, Fred), a young man named Josh, who has enlisted in the navy and is due to ship out on the evening of July 4. Josh (like Cratchit) has a crippled son, Tim.

We later find out that Zucker takes this over the top by introducing us to Josh’s two daughters, one who is blind and cross-eyed and one who is on constant dialysis. All three children have been promised, but not given, help by their uncle.

Having won another director’s award from moovealong.org, Moore sets his sights on leading a movement to abolish Independence Day celebrations in America. The movement is to culminate in a demonstration outside Madison Square Garden, while inside the arena, a concert is put on for American troops and their families (headlined by the afore-mentioned Adkins). It is on the night before this demonstration that the three spirits visit Malone. Announcing the visitation of the spirits (in a parallel to Jacob Marley) is John F Kennedy, who Malone proclaims as his “hero”. Unfortunately, Malone (like many liberals who worship JFK) has conveniently forgotten many of Kennedy’s beliefs that they would be consider to be far-right and anathema. In a throw-away line, Malone tells Kennedy that he’s starting to sound like Ronald Reagan, to which JFK replies, “Thank you.”

Zucker lampoons much of the left’s ideology, from the assumption that terrorism exists because America did something wrong, to the afore-mentioned naivete of negotiation, to “brave” Hollywood directors who tackle no-longer-existing evils of the past but are too cowardly to address current evils such as terrorism. An American Carol also features an appearance by a beret-wearing Rosie O’Connell, who even Malone thinks is nuts. There are also appearances by bumbling terrorists that will certainly get Zucker in trouble with CAIR, but I doubt that he cares (pun intended).

Sidenote: I find it interesting (and funny) that several times is the movie, Malone points out that he is an Oscar-winning director, to which the other person in the conversation scoffs, “Yeah, for a documentary.” An American Carol released the same weekend as an anti-religion slam-job documentary (that I won’t name, as I don’t want to give it even a little Google publicity).

If you can get around the parts that would be offensive to some (which I’ll discuss in a moment) and are of a conservative ilk — or at least have some personal honesty and a funny bone (both of which would disqualify Moore) — An American Carol is a fun movie.

* - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * -*

Content advisory stuff: Although there are no f-bombs, language is consistent with a PG-13 rating. Unfortunately, like many purveyors of sophomoric comedy, Zucker includes in this some children using foul language. While surprising juxtaposition (in this case, childlike innocence vs foul language) is a staple of comedy, this particular usage of the concept has always struck me as unnecessary. (Granted, though, it is all in insulting characterization of Malone, so half a point to Zucker for accuracy, even if it’s unnecessary.)

There are a few sexual references, including two characters who make a hand-gesture that implies male masturbation and an innocent (but confusing to characters who only hear, and don’t see the context) conversation between two characters. For the latter, think of the misunderstood conversations that were stock in trade in the TV show Three’s Company, only a bit cruder when misinterpreted.

Violence appears occasionally, but it’s generally of a cartoonish nature. If you’re of a mind that the old Looney Tunes were too violent, then the violence in this movie would probably offend you. Though if you are of such a mind, the whole movie would probably offend you, anyway.


how low can you go?

by @ Thursday, August 2nd, 2007. Filed under give 'em zell, political rants

Patty Murray sometimes confuses herself with Ed NortonHarry Reid in one of his more elated momentsDon’t get me wrong. It’s not like I’m surprised or anything.

Less than 24 hours after the bridge collapse in Minneapolis, Democratic senators were already using the tragedy for their own political purposes.

Harry Reid (D-NV) led the charge as Democrats slammed the administration and other Republicans for failing to pass non-existent or mis-identified infrastructure bills. Reid even pulled 9/11 oout as a club.

Patty Murray (D-WA) joined in on the fun, saying that she worried about things like this every day. Interesting that this is so important to her, and yet she waited until now to make a big stink about it.

At least somebody in the public eye said something rational (emphases mine):

“It’s unfortunate and unconscionable that Democratic leaders in Congress are trying to use this horrific event as an opportunity to launch attacks,” said [White House] spokesman Scott Stanzel, pointing out that Bush’s veto threat of the transportation appropriations bill is not related to highway funding.

There’s not a whole lot of Congressional stupidity that’s surprising enough to stir me to action. But I will be contacting Reid’s and Murray’s offices tomorrow to ask if, the next time they want to stand on dead bodies to make political hay, can they wait til the bodies are fished out of the water?

In case you want to get in on it, here’s their info:

Reid’s DC office:

Fax: (202) 224-7327 Phone: (202) 224-3542

Reid by email

Other offices and addresses for Reid at the bottom of this page.

Murray’s DC office:

Fax: (202) 224-0238 Phone: (202) 224-2621

Murray by email

Other offices and addresses for Murray on this page.


hooked on consensus

by @ Thursday, May 17th, 2007. Filed under give 'em zell, humor (arr, arr), political rants

I was listening to a bit of Hugh Hewitt’s radio show on Thursday while out driving around. He was discussing the inanity of the McCain-Kennedy bill that’ll make the borders have too many holes in them to even make a good sieve.

One of his guests was James Lileks, who noted John McCain’s obsession with consensus. McCain had said that this bill was “a product of a long hard trail of negotiation”. With this in mind, as well as McCain’s other past stunts of capitulation (see also McCain-Feingold, Abu Ghraib grandstanding, the Gang of 14, etc), Lileks said the following: *

McCain thinks this is a victory solely because of all the negotiation. If he was negotiating between a group that wanted to play baseball and a group that wanted to play football, he’d consider it a victory if they got together to play a game where you dribbled a pigskin and then kicked it into a hockey net, even though the game was totally unplayable.

* Note: This is paraphrased based on my memory of listening to a radio show. But it’s pretty close, and the spirit is definitely there.


it’s shameful

by @ Thursday, March 15th, 2007. Filed under give 'em zell, political rants

Senator Mitch McConnellHaven’t given a Give ‘em Zell award in quite a while. Rumsfeld’s resignation knocked any serious contention for a loop for quite a while.

But today on the Senate floor, Senator Mitch McConnell (R - KY) spoke regarding the debate over Dems trying to set a timetable on troop pullout of Iraq. He noted that:

. . . many prominent Democrats opposed [a timetable] up until the day that President Bush announced his plan for securing Baghdad just two months ago.

Then noting the about-face of those politicians, he surmised that:

. . . this debate was worthwhile, because it exposed the principle . . . “If the President proposed it, we oppose it.” And this is no principle at all. It’s pure politics. It’s unworthy in good times. It’s shameful at a time of war.

I hear there’s a new term being bandied about: Mitch-slapped. ;-)


enuf sed

by @ Thursday, November 2nd, 2006. Filed under give 'em zell, humor (arr, arr), political rants

(click for larger image)

speaking of botched

by @ Wednesday, November 1st, 2006. Filed under give 'em zell, political rants

John F-ing Kerry is now claiming that his slam on the men and women in the military was unintentional and a “botched joke”. He spent 2 days refusing to apologize and defending what he said before today. Makes today’s apology seem really sincere, doesn’t it?

VP Dick Cheney’s analysis (and latest winner of the Give ‘Em Zell award):

Of course, now Senator Kerry says he was just making a joke, and he botched it up. I guess we didn’t get the nuance. He was for the joke before he was against it.

Question for the Dems: So how do you deal with it when an October Surprise gets pulled on you by a member of your own party?

funny and factual

by @ Thursday, October 12th, 2006. Filed under give 'em zell, humor (arr, arr), political rants

[image]David Zucker, director of such farcical comedies as Airplane and The Naked Gun recently created an ad for GOP organizations that will never get any TV air-play. But thanks to the wonders of the web, it’ll probably be seen by many more people than would see it on network television, anyway (all three of them).

The commerical exposes the folly of diplomacy by appeasement. It starts with the true account of the Clinton administration sending Madeleine Albright to North Korea to give Kim Jong Il a basketball autographed by Michael Jordan. Then it traces the logical extension of such naivete (held by most Democrats), portraying Albright mowing a terrorist’s lawn or changing his flat tire, assuming that this would keep him from doing anything bad to America.

You can see the ad here in all its loony, but factual, glory.

taking lessons from cheney

by @ Tuesday, September 19th, 2006. Filed under give 'em zell, political rants

President Bush at UNI never thought I’d be able to give a “Give ‘Em Zell” award to a president. Even President Bush, as forthright as he is, generally leaves the straight talk to VP Cheney, Sec Rumsfeld, et al.

But today, President Bush addressed the Unnecessary Nations and secured himself in the “Give ‘Em Zell” hall of fame. Of particular note was the following comment:

Some have argued that the democratic changes we’re seeing in the Middle East are destabilizing the region. This argument rests on a false assumption, that the Middle East was stable to begin with.

Bush had actually paused after the word “assumption” to let the translators catch up, and I inserted what I thought was an appropriate conclusion of that sentence, keeping in mind that I was being a bit of a smart-aleck. Then the President finished the sentence exactly how I had just said it.

Not bad company, if I do say so. ;-)

sanity from the last century

by @ Thursday, April 13th, 2006. Filed under give 'em zell, political rants

[image] Theodore Roosevelt — 1919:

In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here does in good faith become an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed or birthplace or origin. But this is predicated upon the man?s becoming in very fact an American and nothing but an American.

If he tries to keep segregated with men of his own origin and separated from the rest of America, then he isn’t doing his part as an American.

We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile. We have room for but one language here and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns our people out as Americans, and American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polyglot boarding house; and we have room for but one sole loyalty, and that is loyalty to the American people.

Note: You may have received an email with part of this quote in it, and attributing it to 1907. The quote is accurate, but the date is not. HT to snopes.com for clearing that up.

[powered by WordPress.]


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser