TNR BLOGS

December 02, 2008 | 4:23 PM
December 02, 2008 | 3:50 PM
December 02, 2008 | 2:56 PM

December 02, 2008 | 9:54 PM
December 02, 2008 | 9:51 PM
December 02, 2008 | 8:12 PM

July 26, 2008 | 2:24 PM
July 23, 2008 | 1:55 PM
July 17, 2008 | 3:56 PM

December 02, 2008 | 10:33 AM
December 01, 2008 | 6:03 PM
December 01, 2008 | 4:08 PM
COLUMNISTS
TODAY'S STORIES
05.09.2008
Who Were the Ad Wizards Behind McCain's Speech?

Yesterday’s Washington Post reported that McCain wordsmith Mark Salter had been circulating drafts of last night's speech for eight weeks, meaning he’d been working on it for much longer. After hearing the final product, I can’t help thinking it suffered from all the writing and re-writing. This was a stitched-together mess—like a Hollywood blockbuster that sucks in dozens of screenwriters, becoming a little less coherent with each overhaul.

As in Hollywood, the speech felt like it had been rewritten from one focus group to the next. Salter’s signature style is a kind of brooding lyricism. But somewhere between McCain’s second pronouncement on the changing global economy and his plug for greater community college access, it became obvious that Salter wasn’t the creative force behind this performance. Instead of Salter-esque standbys like duty and valor, the reigning theme was “me tooâ€--as though Team McCain was surprised when Obama spoke to Rust Belt voters last week and felt it had to match him. By the time every consultant worked in a shout-out to his favorite swing state, the speech was so un-Salter-like even McCain seemed unfamiliar with it.

McCain is hardly the most spell-binding orator on his best days. Last night he alternated between distant and sing-song-y. “And that's just what I intend to do: stand on your side and fight for your future,†he said at one point. I’ve rarely heard a politician invest the word “fight†with less emotion. Then, a few minutes later, he was practically maudlin. “Their lives should matter to the people they elect to office. They matter to me,†he assured a family from Michigan. McCain once played an over-the-hill crooner in a “Saturday Night Live†sketch. When he recited those lines, I couldn’t get his old lounge lizard impression out of my head.

McCain did finally find his voice toward the end of the speech, with a stirring reflection on his Vietnam captivity (probably the lone Salter composition to see the light of day). As he has many times before, McCain recalled how the experience taught him to surrender his personal pride to something greater. But there was a spareness that made it more affecting than usual: “I was never the same again. I wasn't my own man anymore. I was my country's.†Unfortunately for McCain, the passage came far too late in the night to be useful. McCain’s Vietnam testimonial should have framed the entire speech—motivating his interest in leadership and undergirding his policy vision. Instead it felt tacked on, little more than a nod to the speech-writing convention of ending on an eloquent note.

Even on its own terms the text was shockingly ineffective. If you’re going to write a mundane, tactically-minded speech, it should at least achieve your tactical objectives. In this case, the obvious goal was to woo independents, hence all the talk about non-partisanship and accountability. And yet there were frustratingly few examples of McCain’s achievements on these fronts. I counted only a single, four-sentence riff with specifics, and even that was light on details: “I've fought to get million dollar checks out of our elections,†McCain said. “I've fought lobbyists who stole from Indian tribes. I fought crooked deals in the Pentagon. I fought tobacco companies and trial lawyers, drug companies and union bosses.†Everything else was bland generalities.

Similarly, any appeal to independents would want to contrast McCain’s commander-in-chief bona fides with Barack Obama’s--easily his strongest selling point. And yet McCain left the national security comparison entirely implicit. “We face many threats in this dangerous world, but I'm not afraid of them,†he said. “I know how the military works, what it can do, what it can do better, and what it should not do.†When it came to national security, Obama was far tougher on McCain last week than McCain was in response.

Probably the most memorable moment of the speech occurred at the outset and had little to do with McCain himself. It came from a couple of protesters, who got in some licks before losing out to the “U-S-A!†chants that are all the rage at conventions these days. The back and forth seemed to knock McCain off stride, but in retrospect, at least it had the virtue of energizing the hall. The same can’t be said of McCain’s pedestrian prose. By the end of the night, the Republicans seemed like they’d come full circle: down with Obama, up with Palin, then down again with McCain. Or, in the vocabulary of conventions: Palin stepped on Obama’s bounce, then McCain stepped on Palin’s.

--Noam Scheiber

Posted: Friday, September 05, 2008 3:45 AM with 6 comment(s)

Comments

You must be logged-in to comment.

Not a subscriber? Click here to get a digital or print and digital subscription to The New Republic!

Crock1701 said:

You forgot Palin stepping on Palin's bounce, which happened Monday/Tuesday.  Also, in the title of the post, I can't help but think of this SNL sketch:

snltranscripts.jt.org/.../91rstandup.phtml

All the contestants are imitating Seinfeld, but Adam Sandler's keeps going "Who are the ad wizards who came up with this one?!"  Too funny.

September 5, 2008 4:12 AM

Noam Scheiber said:

Right. That's what I was going for there...

September 5, 2008 4:31 AM

K.Crake said:

Good reflection Noam,

I might add that the same "ad wizard's committee" that wrote McCain's speech dropped the ball on the entire night.  First, there was a rambling "speech" from an Oklahoma congresswoman complete with Oklahoma City bombing backdrop.  Putting aside the fact that it didn't make any sense to dwell on a domestic terrorist attack--perpetrated by Tim McVeigh, who inconveniently was not Muslim and was a registered Republican--the speech stunk up the place with baseless fear mongering.

And then, to add insult to injury, the Ad-Wizards-that-be dropped a disgustingly exploitative 9/11 montage on the audience.  Maybe it's just me, but prostituting a national tragedy for base political ends doesn't strike me as imbuing McCain with the "dignity" he claims to run on.

After that, we had the Cindy McCain debacle.  Firstly, the video did a fine job of showing how great Cindy's mom and dad were--too bad neither are running for office.  Then the video attempted to show Cindy as a Peacecorp volunteer, as if the fact that she was standing up there in a $300,000 dress didn't conflict with her Melinda Gates image.  My favorite part of the video was when the narrator proudly proclaimed that "in 1991, Cindy McCain spent 5 days volunteering in Kuwait."  Wow, you mean 20 years ago she spent 5 whole days doing something other than shopping?  Hold on, stop the presses, we've got a new candidate for the Medal of Freedom here.  Her speech was absolutely brutal; the press will hold back on their criticism because it's "not fair" to attack a candidate's wife for her vacuousness.  The whole thing looked like a badly produced infomercial and it dragged on for days; you could cut the awkwardness with a knife.

And finally, St. John himself gets up there.  After three days of hearing about what a hero he is, about all of his selfless sacrifice for God and country, complete with 100' flag backdrop and "tasteful" 9/11 montage, McCain goes out there and lambasts his party for corruption.  Does he think the country forgot that he was a member of the Keating Five?  Maybe the press forgot about this inconvenient, disgraceful part of McCain's biography, but for those of us watching, to see John McCain criticize the Republican party for corruption of all things was the definition of hypocrisy.  On top of this, the Ad Wizards throw up a mansion with a splendid green lawn as his backdrop (how rare is that lawn in parched Arizona anyway?).   As for the U-S-A chants, I thought it was a planned chant to cover any yelling protesters; that is why they kept interrupting McCain awkwardly.  Well, I'm inclined to think that protesters have no place in a convention but after that 9/11 nonsense, I found myself cheering them--it's fine if you want to use a national tragedy for petty political gain, but don't expect respect from the audience for doing so.  

September 5, 2008 9:21 AM

JEFF FREY said:

The problem with highlighting some of McCain's bipartisan or non-partisan achievements is that he has turned his back on them in his run for the nomination this time. He could only have highlighted the ones he still supports! That's better than zero, I think, so he still missed the chance.

September 5, 2008 12:45 PM

JEFF FREY said:

The problem with highlighting some of McCain's bipartisan or non-partisan achievements is that he has turned his back on them in his run for the nomination this time. He could only have highlighted the ones he still supports! That's better than zero, I think, so he still missed the chance.

September 5, 2008 12:53 PM

selish70 said:

Eh...I just popped in to see if the SNL reference was intentional and if anyone picked up on it.  Curiosity satisfied.

September 6, 2008 10:04 AM


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

How do you rate mobile version of this page?

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser