Ph: 8002436002

Imagine if, when you wanted to make a call on your cell phone, you could pick the best rate and most appropriate connection method by choosing between a group of providers bidding for your business? That would beat being locked into a rigid carrier contract. It might also introduce some unforeseen complexities, but hey  -- an appropriately-designed technology system can handle that!

 

That essentially is the message in Google's new patent (#20080232574), "Flexible Communication Systems and Methods," which describes a system where one or more telecom carriers bid to provide connectivity for a communications "session" (think phone call). The customer then picks one of the carriers bidding for his/her business.

 

Intrigued? Get the full scoop in my article here.

If you're like me and find most Bluetooth headsets uncomfortable and/or inconvenient to use, the AXVisor (model TRIBC200) from Tritton Technologies might be just what you're looking for. This is a Bluetooth speakerphone unit that, as its name suggests, clips to the sun visor in your car for hands-free conversations.

 

 

AXVisor_02_BoxContents.jpg 


I tested out the Tritton AXVisor with my AT&T phone, a Nokia 2085 clamshell. I quickly discovered that, as with any Bluetooth device, the functionality of the Visor is limited mostly by the hands-free function on the phone you have. Mine allows voice dialing (no programming necessary) for any person in the contacts list, after a long press of the phone's + or - volume button. I discovered that voice dialing on the 2085 is a bit fiddly -- I tried to specify a particular person I wanted to call several times before it recognized what I was saying. This was not the fault of the AXVisor, of course.

 

To see my full review of the AXVisor -- specifics about how it performed when I put it through the paces -- click here.

 

Overall, I found the Tritton Visor to be quite simple to use, and appreciate the ability to make (mostly) hands-free calls while in the car without using a Bluetooth headset. If you do a lot of traveling alone in a vehicle, I would say it's well worth the roughly $90-$100 the device is currently selling for. (Tritton's Web site lists 8 U.S. distributors, and 22 U.S. resellers for the AXVisor, but upon doing a spot-check wasn't able to find it online from Micro Center, CompUSA, Newegg.com, or Costco. I did find it from Buy.com, MacMall and tigerdirect.com.)

I got a call this morning from a rep at Avanquest Software, alerting me to the fact that the company is offering free consumer downloads of its new wireless networking tool for laptop users, Connection Manager. (The software has a retail value of $29.95.)

 

Connection Manager is designed for anyone living the "mobile lifestyle" with a laptop in tow. Its function is to provide users with quick, secure Internet/network access regardless of the connectivity method being used.

 

"Connection Manager automatically identifies and stores necessary network and security parameters for virtually every type of publicly used connection standard, including standard Ethernet, WiFi, ADSL and WiMAX," the company said in a July 22 announcement.

 

The software stores preferred network and security settings for every type of connection method and application being used (e.g. e-mail client, printer, shared disk drive), enabling laptop users to "seamlessly transition from one network to the next without having to adjust settings or deal with annoying error messages." It achieves this feat by working with existing firewalls and security apps to "guarantee optimal protection levels for the chosen network environment."

 

ConnectionManagerScreenshot.jpg
Connection Manager Screenshot

 

Connection Manager is compatible with current WPA encryption protocols and 64/128-bit WEP.

 

While the software is marketed toward business users, it seems to me that anyone concerned about security (and everyone should be) would do well to check out Connection Manager.

 

Ryan Smith, director of product marketing at Avanquest Publishing USA, summed up that thought well: "Whether novice users or power users, everyone can appreciate Connection Manger's automatic handling of tedious Internet connection configurations, letting anyone just simply turn on their laptop and start surfing the Web."

 

I would only add the word "secure" to Smith's statement.

 

To see Connection Manager in action, you can check out two YouTube videos. The first is amusing, the second is more standard fare for a product promotion.

One of the challenges for manufacturers of consumer electronics products is how to minimize the cost of building a particular gadget, while maximizing profits. Cut too many corners, and there's the risk of losing potential customers. Spend too much on features people don't really care about, and it's likely the result will be unnecessary costs.

 

It appears that Apple has struck a pretty good balance between these two extremes in the new iPhone 3G. That's the conclusion reached by applied market intelligence firm iSuppli, which makes a habit of taking apart products to find out what's inside and how much the components cost.

 

While iSuppli hasn't actually been able to dissect the actual iPhone 3G yet (it won't be available until July 11), the firm did manage to conduct a "virtual teardown," and estimated that it will cost Apple about $173 to manufacture each phone. That can be compared with a $226 "bill of materials" (BOM) for the original 8GB iPhone.

 

"The new iPhone is significantly less expensive to produce than the first-generation product, despite major improvements in the product's functionality and unique usability, due to the addition of 3G communications," said Jagdish Rebello, director and principal analyst for iSuppli, in a statement.

 

Apple typically prices its iPod and iPhone products at about 50 percent more than their BOM and manufacturing costs, iSuppli said. iPhone 3G is no exception, and in fact Apple will actually make more profit per unit with this product than the previous generation; the new phone sells for $199, and Apple gets an estimated subsidy per unit of $300, from wireless carriers, resulting in a boosted BOM/manufacturing margin.

 

The way iPhone 3G will be sold represents a significant strategic change on the part of Apple.

 

"The original 2G phone was sold at an unsubsidized price of $499," Rebello explained. "However, at a retail price of $199 for the low-end 8Gbyte version of the new 3G model, wireless communications service carriers will be selling the product at a subsidized rate, using a common business model for the mobile-handset market. ... With subsidies from
carriers, Apple will be selling the 8Mbyte version of the second-generation iPhone to carriers at an effective price of about $499 per unit, the same as the original product."

 

In changing its business model for iPhone, Apple is also giving up service revenue associated with its phone (previously carriers paid the company a portion of revenue from service subscriptions. This means Apple is relying heavily on profiting from carrier subsidies on the hardware.

 

"Hardware is vital to Apple profits, valuation and revenue in the consumer-electronics and wireless communications realms," Rebello said. "In fact, two-thirds of Apple's revenue from the iPod still is derived from hardware, while only one third is from the iTunes service and accessories. The second-generation iPhone is no exception."

I got a note the other day from Craig Settles, an expert in the area of municipal WiFi networks, who wanted to make sure I’d seen the news about EarthLink pulling out of the muni WiFI network in Philadelphia. (Incidentally, last month EarthLink also made known its plans to pull out of the muni WiFi project in New Orleans, effective May 18.)
 
In a press announcement dated May 13, EarthLink made clear its plans to terminate WiFi service in Philadelphia, following months of unsuccessful negotiations with the city government to transfer management of the entire network — worth $17 million — to the municipality or to Wireless Philadelphia, a non-profit.
 
“EarthLink has worked diligently for many months to transfer our WiFi network to a new owner -- at no cost," said Rolla Huff, EarthLink's chairman and chief executive officer, in a statement. “Unfortunately, our hope that we could transfer our network to a non-profit organization that had planned to offer free WiFi throughout Philadelphia will not be realized. Since we have exhausted our efforts to find a new owner of the network, our only responsible alternative now is to remove our network at our cost and assist
our WiFi customers with alternative ways to access the Internet.”
 
EarthLink will continue serving existing customers during a 30-day transition period, ending June 12.
 
Settles, who takes a very strong view that most unsuccessful muni WiFi projects were a mistake from the beginning, called the latest developments “the merciful euthanasia of a flawed business model that never should have seen the light of day.”
 
Never one to mince words, Settles’ opposition to this and similar projects centers around  the way in which the business model supporting each network was set up. Instead of incumbent carriers like EarthLink being in charge, he’s said many times, control of and funding for the networks should be handled at a local level by city governments, and that more planning should be done for the networks prior to deployment.

Settled noted that, as these projects go, Philadelphia did a good job of assessment and business planning. EarthLink built the network for free as a loss-leader to generate interest from other municipalities. Despite the planning, though, this network wasn't successful. Settles chalked that up to problems at EarthLink. 

"Even though the city was achieving one of its main objectives with the network, all the turmoil at EarthLink is dragging Philly down with them," he said. 

Philadelphia aside, cities have tended to be over-eager, in Settles’ view, to sign on the dotted line when big providers come knocking with offers to build and maintain a municipal WiFi network — for free. Problems tend to crop up once the network is built and the provider finds it can’t  generate enough revenue — from low-cost subscriptions, or from ads — to keep the whole thing running.
 
In an e-mail correspondence today, Settles said municipal WiFi in and of itself isn’t a bad thing — what’s bad is simply the business model used.
 
“Expect to see this crop of stalled projects be replaced by a steady stream of success stories coming out of small cities such as Santa Monica, CA and Providence, RI, and also cities as big as New York,” he said.
 
What will make these projects successful, where WiFi networks elsewhere have failed? Three things, Settles said. First, a focus on local governments as the primary customer using these networks. Second, other customers — such as medical and academic institutions — will be brought on board as well. Third, successful WiFi deployments will be preceded by a thorough needs analysis of the main customers.
 
Settles offered a fourth item in the recipe for muni WiFi success as well: how creative stakeholders are willing to be when it comes time to tackling questions about financing. The goal is to make sure financing the network is sustainable without requiring taxpayer subsidies.
 
I was curious if Settles thinks the rise of WiMAX (for example, the recently announced Clearwire/Sprint deal) is having any noticeable effect on muni WiFi. He answered by first cautioning against getting too hyped up about any particular technology, be it WiMAX or WiFi.
 
“This technology-as-rock-star mindset is part of the problems cities are having today,” Settles told me. “So many politicians proclaimed WiFi as the magic bullet to meet all of their needs, from digital inclusion to economic development, and they built expectations that the technology couldn't meet.”
 
Good point. Nice to find out what a particular technology can actually do before making big promises about it.
 
Settles predicts that WiMAX, when it’s ready for “prime time,” will have a role to play in muni broadband, but won’t be the only star. Perhaps it will be the solution for connected people in rural, sparsely populated regions. Maybe it will be the “backhaul vehicle” for muni networks.
 
Settles added that companies like NetNearU see WiMAX as complementing muni broadband initiatives, but that it’s unlikely to replace WiFi anytime soon. More likely, WiMAX will address limitations inherent with WiFi.
 
“I'm taking a wait-and-see approach until WiMAX, and devices that can support them, become more real and show some decent signs of end user adoption,” Settles concluded.
 
Sounds like good advice to me.
Trackstick IINow here’s a cool wireless gadget: the Trackstick II Personal GPS Tracker. This little device uses GPS to track its own location, time, data, speed, heading and altitude at present intervals. Since you can pop it in your pocket or purse, that means it also can track your location — or the location of anything that moves.
 
That’s great, but what do you do with the location data gathered? Simple: play it back using Google Earth. This seamless (and free) integration with Google Earth means it’s a snap to bring information gathered in the real, physical world to the online realm.
 
“Use it for recording the exact routes you take when hiking, biking or vacationing,” DavesGadgetWorld.com, where you can buy this nifty gadget, suggests. “Record the location of everywhere you went, import pictures and other information into Google Earth to offer an entirely new perspective of your journey.”
 
The Trackstick has more than 1 Mb of memory, which DavesGadgetWorld.com claims “can store months of travel information.” It also includes GPX photo stamping so you can add pictures to the maps you create in Google Earth.
 
The Trackstick II Personal GPS Tracker has a suggested retail price of $199.
This week (April 1-3) was the CTIA Wireless 2008 show in Las Vegas. All week TMCnet has been reporting on news from the show, which is put on (as the name suggests) by CTIA, an organization whose acronym formerly stood for “Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Assocation,” but now simply goes by CTIA  —  The Wireless Association.
 
The show’s Web site has a full roster of news highlights from this week, but here are a few that caught my eye from TMCnet’s coverage.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For even more coverage of the show, check out the blogs for Rich Tehrani and Greg Galitzine.
Uploading digital photos from a camera to a computer is a task that lots of people (myself included) tend to put off since it takes time and requires digging for the USB cable. (Which drawer did I put it in again?) Wouldn’t it be great if there was an easier way to get photos from camera to computer hard drive—or better yet, directly to a bogging or social networking site?
 
A startup called Eye-Fi thought so, too. And they did something about it: developed the Eye-Fi wireless SD card. This is a 2B SD card that pops into a digital camera just a like a regular card. Only difference is, it’s got a built-in wireless transmitter. So instead of plugging in a cable, all you have to do is turn on the camera within range of your home WiFi network and grab the photos. 

Eye-Fi Wireless SD Card
 
The Eye-Fi card is also compatible with a variety of printing and sharing Web sites, including: Costco.com, dotphoto, facebook, flickr, Fotki, Gallery2, Kodak Gallery, phanfare, photobucket, Picasa Web Albums, RitzPix, Sharpcast, Shutterfly, SmugMug, snapfish, TypePad, VOX, Wal-Mart, webshots, and Windows Live.  
 
Here are a few technical specs: static WEP security, 90+ feet range outdoors (45+ feet indoors), compatible with 802.11g, b and backwards-compatible 802.11n networks.
 
I haven’t tried the Eye-Fi card myself (waiting till they come out with a version in xD format for my camera). If you do give it a try, let me know what you think.
I’ve long held the belief that driving while talking on a cell phone is dangerous, even if one is using a headset or switching on the speakerphone function. (Although I’m as guilty as the next person of talking while driving anyway.) Now some recent research adds more backing to that argument.
 
Marcel Just, director at Carnegie Mellon University’s Center for Cognitive Brain Imaging, decided to find out the extend to which non-driving activities distract drivers from their primary task of steering a vehicle down the road.
 
In a March 9 report that’s been making the rounds online, USA Today explained what happened when 29 volunteer subjects were hooked up to an MRI brain scanner while engaging in a simulated driving exercise. Some of the volunteers were left alone to engage only in the driving exercise. Some were asked to decide, at the same time, whether a sentence they heard was true or false.
 
Results? The MRI scan recorded a 37 percent decrease in parietal lobe activity in the volunteers who were multi-tasking, USA Today said. (This part of the brain is associated with special processing.) There was also less activity in the occipital lobe, associated with processing visual information. Not surprisingly given the MRI results, the “drivers” who were multitasking veered off the virtual road more often than their single-minded counterparts.
 
“Certain activities in life are inherently multitasking, but driving and cellphone use isn't something Mother Nature thought about when she was designing our brains,” Just was quoted as saying in the USA Today report.
 
Just admitted that, while the results clearly indicate that driving and talking on the phone don’t mix, banning all use of cell phones in vehicles is too draconian a measure. It might work better, USA Today said, to instead cut down on accidents by forbidding cell phone use in certain situations—like rush hour or inclement weather—that require a fairly high level of concentration for safe driving.
 
The report noted that seven parts of the U.S. forbid the use of handheld phones when driving: Connecticut, New York, California, New Jersey, the District of Columbia and the Virgin Islands. No jurisdiction, however, forbids using hands-free devices.
 
Jonathan Adkins, spokesperson for the Governors Highway Safety Association, thinks hands-free devices lure people into a false sense of security. In the USA Today report, he said there is no evidence that bans on handheld phones have helped prevent accidents.
 
Where do you stand on this issue?
WiMAX is hot and getting hotter. That’s essentially the conclusion reached by Infonetics in its recent WiMAX and Mesh Network Equipment and Devices report.
 
Just how hot? During 2007, the WiMAX market grew sequentially 46 percent (for the year), with worldwide sales (fixed and mobile) just shy of $800 million. That number was reached thanks to deployments in more than 80 countries around the world.
 
Infonetics predicted that commercial WiMAX network deployments will continue growing during 2008 and beyond—with market value projected at $7 billion by 2011.
 
What’s driving the WiMAX market? Here is Infonetics analyst Richard Webb: “Among the most significant developments: Cisco's acquisition of mobile WiMAX vendor Navini Networks, the market entrance of specialist ASN gateway vendor WiChorus, the launch of WiMAX phones and Ultra Mobile PCs, and the new Open WiMAX initiative, which promotes disruptive, all-IP open WiMAX architecture, and should lead to best-of-breed solutions with inter-vendor interoperability.”
 
Attaching vendor names to WiMAX market growth, Infonetics reported that, for 2007, Alvarion led the worldwide fixed WiMAX equipment market in terms of revenue, followed by Airspan. In the mobile arena, the number one and two spots were held by Motorola and Samsung, respectively.
Yesterday I blogged about a company called Radar Networks that just completed Round B of its financing series. Well, it turns out that Radar must be a winning name. Another company, Tiny Pictures—which offers a mobile photo and video sharing service called Radar—also just completed Round B of its financing series, pulling in $7.2 million from Draper Fisher Jurvetson and Mohr Davidow Ventures.
 
Previously, Tiny Pictures raised $4 million from Mohr Davidow Ventures and “angel invetors” Reid Hoffman and Joichi Ito. Funds raised during Round B, the company said, will be used for international growth and development of its recently launched ad platform.
 
Radar from Tiny Pictures enables real-time sharing of photos and videos between cameraphone users. It can be accessed on wireless devices, on PC browsers and through a series of mobile applications.
 
Tiny Pictures was founded in 2005 by John Poisson, who formerly headed up the mobile media research and design groups at Sony in Tokyo, Japan. The startup company is based out of San Francisco, California.
 
For more about Tiny Pictures and its Radar service, see:
 
Radar Networks is on a role. The company announced Monday completion of Round B financing series, during which it brought in $13 million from several venture capital firms. This brings total venture capital funding for the company to $18 million, including Round B and Round A (which closed in April, 2006).
 
What’s drawing venture capital firms to invest in Radar? The company offers an online service called Twine, which the company describes as a “Web 3.0” application, part of the “Semantic Web.”
 
Twine lets users organize, share and discover information that correlates to their interests, and connect with networks of like-minded people. In this sense, it is similar to a lot other “social network” services on the Web. But Radar is taking this idea to a new level what the company calls “semantic understanding,” a method of automatically organizing information using algorithms that learns from users’ interests and uses its conclusions to make connection and recommendations.
 
Given the trend toward social networking services being used not only on desktop computers but on mobile devices as well, it seems likely that Twine will prove useful to computer-based surfers and on-the-go social networkers alike.
 
Round B of Radar’s financing series was led by Velocity Interactive Group. Draper Fisher Jurvetson and Vulcan Capital also participated.
The power of Google’s ability to perform fast and accurate Web searches comes in large part from the its distributed nature—using a geographically dispersed network of computing power to deliver results to users quickly. Distributed systems like Google’s have another advantage, too: they inherently protect against any single point of failure since if equipment in one location goes down the slack can be picked up somewhere else.
 
In a Thursday post, ZDNet MobileTech blogger Eric Everson suggested that, in light of two major outages within a year, RIM might want to consider a more distributed type of architecture to provide service for its BlackBerry devices, rather than feeding everything through a centralized system.
 
Everson quoted a Canadian Press report as pointing out that, “The concentration of RIM's BlackBerry service at a single network operation centre in the Ontario city of Waterloo, through which traffic such as e-mails are routed, exacerbates such problems and leaves it open to more crashes.”
 
Everson added in his post, “If at a network level everything is routed through a bottleneck configuration it likely doesn’t take the Founder of MyMobiSafe.com to point out that there may be some mobile security issues users should consider.”
 
In other words, there is power in numbers and RIM might do well to consider adopting a distributed network architecture to avoid such a major outage again in the future.