
The interesting thing about visiting california is that I am simultaneously delighted by the smell of ocean rolling in off the breakers and infuriated that nothing noteworthy is open past 9pm.
Two days ago I ate at the worst taqueria in santa cruz, it’s still twice as good as anything in new york.

It turns out that Alligators are hopelessly enamored with marshmallows. There are even tours through Louisiana and Florida where people can purportedly feed alligators by hand. Coming from a guy with only nine fingers, that is probably one of the dumbest fucking things I’ve heard of in months.
This actually makes a lot of sense if you know a little something about sugar:
“[W]hen rats were allowed to choose mutually-exclusively between water sweetened with saccharin-an intense calorie-free sweetener-and intravenous cocaine-a highly addictive and harmful substance-the large majority of animals (94%) preferred the sweet taste of saccharin. The preference for saccharin was not attributable to its unnatural ability to induce sweetness without calories because the same preference was also observed with sucrose, a natural sugar. Finally, the preference for saccharin was not surmountable by increasing doses of cocaine and was observed despite either cocaine intoxication, sensitization or intake escalation-the latter being a hallmark of drug addiction.”, wrote the researchers.
“Our findings clearly demonstrate that intense sweetness can surpass cocaine reward, even in drug-sensitized and -addicted individuals.” they concluded. Still, some researchers point out that these conclusions could not be applied directly to humans. Humans are generally aware that something they’re ingesting could get them “hooked” and that the effects could harm them. Rats, on the other hand, lack this awareness and are driven only by the sensations produced by a chemical.
Another issue: sugar, with all its potential cavity-inducing and obesity havoc, is still a nutrient, whereas cocaine’s benefits for the body are non existent. Still, refined sugars (like, sucrose, fructose) did not enter in the human diet until very recently in our history. The overconsumption of diets rich in refined sugars, combined with other factors, is the main cause that determines the current obesity epidemic. Overconsumption of refined sugar rich foods or beverages is initially determined by the pleasure of feeling that sweet taste, and which acts like a drug addiction.
I found an interesting and strangely touching article in the NYtimes on an alligator trapper in the everglades. Lots of fun fackts.
-In 1977 alligators were endangered, now there are over 15 million of them in Florida alone.
This snapshot of San Francisco as a city teeming with homeless junkies is not entirely inaccurate. Of course, the reasons fox news presents [secular progressivism] are totally off. The reasons for homelessness in the city are unsurprisingly more complex. My research indicates that the single biggest problem is simply that homeless people from all over the country come to San Francisco. Essentially, SF is tasked with a federal sized problem on a municipal budget. It’s not that the city government adores crack smoke wafting over the tenderloin, the city simply lacks the resources to deal with it. The city has rejected as broadly irrational the notion that jailing drug addicts is either rational or cost effective but has failed to come up with a better solution. 1/2 way there.
Just checking a message on facebook and saw the this ad. Initially it struck me as deeply absurd but I’m coming around to the idea that she might be on to something. A lot of people don’t really realize that if you want to do something difficult you can save yourself a lot of time and ensure success by simply asking people that have already done it. If you’re nice, generally grateful and ask interesting questions the people you ask will become mentors. It’s seems a lot of people would rather puzzle through a process the long and hard way while risking failure than simply doing things the easy way. Which is cool I guess but not necessarily smart or useful most of the time. Finding mentors is largely a numbers game so it makes a lot of sense that she just placed a facebook ad.
The interesting part is that the Ad links to her blog instead of some way to contact her. I did a facebook search and found 37 people named leslie bradshaw. I sleuthed around on her blog until I found enough info about her to do a relevant facebook search and send a query about the success of her campaign + advice on how she can get a better response. {have the ad link to the about page on her blog, place her email at the top of the page and then add a direct link to her facebook profile. I am continually baffled by people who don’t understand that making a task even marginally more difficult will substantially reduce it’s possible success. but whatever, it keeps me employed}
My view is that if you don’t have any mentors you’re probably not doing anything hard. Heads up, this is a possible sign that you are stagnating and becoming lame.
U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina said that the government’s authority to hold the men had “ceased” and that they were entitled to be released. The 17 are Uighurs who fled persecution in the far western reaches of China. U.S. authorities, fearing what Chinese officials would do, have refused to send them back to China
wait, back up a second. For 4 years the pentagon was saying “We have to keep torturing them, because otherwise they might get…tortured” ?!?!?!
did i get that right? because it is a fucking sad day to be an American. +1 internets to Ricardo M. Urbina.
:: Full Article via LA Times ::
Also, in the rumor mill and unsubstantiated second hand story department, I met a guy at a cocktail party last year who worked with a lot of the gitmo stuff and he said that nearly every single case was exactly like this. ie zero evidence.
So, I just finished reading The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein. Klein details the rise of Chicago School Economics and the inherently undemocratic measures used to enforce a free market ideology. She also discusses how neoliberals take advantage of disasters to push through free market reforms. She uses different case studies to make her point, most notably Chile, Israel, South Africa and Iraq. I thought this was an interesting quote about Iraq.
There was little interest in the idea that war was a rational policy choice, that the architects of the invasion had unleashed ferocious violence because they could not crack open the closed economies of the Middle East by peaceful means, that the level of terror was proportional to what was at stake. (pg. 414)
:: Free Time via Times Online ::
Let me add here that while I don’t condone feeding ecstasy to ceos, I can see how it might seem like a good idea at the time.
I wrote this a while ago and never published it because I wanted to make it one of those fancy three part blog posts. I think there’s a lot of power in realizing when you are never going to do something and just letting it go.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture yesterday asked U.S. farmers to keep their cloned animals off the market indefinitely even as Food and Drug Administration officials announced that food from cloned livestock is safe to eat. Bruce I. Knight, the USDA’s undersecretary for marketing and regulatory programs, requested an ongoing “voluntary moratorium” to buy time for “an acceptance process” that Knight said consumers in the United States and abroad will need, “given the emotional nature of this issue.”
Yet even as the two agencies sought a unified message — that food from clones is safe for people but perhaps dangerous to U.S. markets and trade relations — evidence surfaced suggesting that Americans and others are probably already eating meat from the offspring of clones. Executives from the nation’s major cattle cloning companies conceded yesterday that they have not been able to keep track of how many offspring of clones have entered the food supply, despite a years-old request by the FDA to keep them off the market pending completion of the agency’s safety report.
FDA: Hey, did you write down that stuff about about the experimental untested food like I asked?
Beef Industry: ohhh duuuuude, I totally forgot. My bad!
Now! from the people who brought you mad cow disease, CLONED MEAT!!!
You seriously have to read this whole article, it’s a fucking riot.
USDA Recommends Food From Clones Stay Off the Market
My favorite part is when the cattle/biotech companies are all “Cloning is just a way to make offspring” it’s like invitro fertilization. wtf, no seriously WTF!?!? Although maybe my favorite part is when the article talks about how the few clones that do survive are plagued with birth defects and abnormally high rates of disease but don’t worry, it’s safe to eat! And besides, we can’t label it because that would just keep people from buying it.
While the future is bright and shiny, it’s just as corrupt on the inside.
—-
A couple days ago the USDA issued the biggest beef recall in history, 143 million pounds. I’ve seen several articles on this and most of them gloss over a few salient points that I’d like to reiterate here
-This recall goes back two years. Wait, seriously? Yes, that is physically impossible and I’m concerned that there is no one in the media rational enough to collapse in ridicule.
-A two year recall means that most of this meat has already been consumed.
-Downed cattle requirements are in place because of mad cow disease. My understanding is that these regulations as they (ahem) stand right now are seriously inadequate. Also, mad cow disease is seriously under reported because there are strong disincentives for telling the truth.
-Almost universally the articles that I’ve seen completely fail to critically engage the beef industry’s claims about the safety of the food supply. I’ll try my best to paraphrase
Beef Industry: “The government forced us to recall an insanely large amount of meat because it’s been unsafe for two years. We didn’t notice that but trust us, eating meat is 100% safe.”
Journalists: “okay, well, we’ll just repeat your logically incoherent soundbite ad nauseum so that people don’t accidentally get really pissed off about how incompetent and greedy you are.”
-This is a recall spurred on by a video recorded secretly and delivered to the humane society. This didn’t come out because of vigilant regulators. I highly recommend watching the video.
Argh. I knew there was a good reasonthat I shouldn’t have ever trusted Facebook.
Facebook’s privacy policy
Just for fun, try substituting the words ‘Big Brother’ whenever you read the word ‘Facebook’
1 We will advertise at you
“When you use Facebook, you may set up your personal profile, form relationships, send messages, perform searches and queries, form groups, set up events, add applications, and transmit information through various channels. We collect this information so that we can provide you the service and offer personalised features.”
2 You can’t delete anything
“When you update information, we usually keep a backup copy of the prior version for a reasonable period of time to enable reversion to the prior version of that information.”
3 Anyone can glance at your intimate confessions
“… we cannot and do not guarantee that user content you post on the site will not be viewed by unauthorised persons. We are not responsible for circumvention of any privacy settings or security measures contained on the site. You understand and acknowledge that, even after removal, copies of user content may remain viewable in cached and archived pages or if other users have copied or stored your user content.”
4 Our marketing profile of you will be unbeatable
“Facebook may also collect information about you from other sources, such as newspapers, blogs, instant messaging services, and other users of the Facebook service through the operation of the service (eg, photo tags) in order to provide you with more useful information and a more personalised experience.”
5 Opting out doesn’t mean opting out
“Facebook reserves the right to send you notices about your account even if you opt out of all voluntary email notifications.”
6 The CIA may look at the stuff when they feel like it
“By using Facebook, you are consenting to have your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States … We may be required to disclose user information pursuant to lawful requests, such as subpoenas or court orders, or in compliance with applicable laws. We do not reveal information until we have a good faith belief that an information request by law enforcement or private litigants meets applicable legal standards. Additionally, we may share account or other information when we believe it is necessary to comply with law, to protect our interests or property, to prevent fraud or other illegal activity perpetrated through the Facebook service or using the Facebook name, or to prevent imminent bodily harm. This may include sharing information with other companies, lawyers, agents or government agencies.”
Question
Will someone, ANYONE, please tell me what the difference is between he Democratic Party and the Republican Party? I can’t tell the difference anymore.
Answer
If you’re for gay rights, you’re a Democrat. If you’re for gay sex, you’re Republican.
One problem with American politics is that the unions were aggressively depoliticized during the Red Scare / HUAC / McCarthyism of the 1940s and ’50s. Labour unions were completely purged of communist, socialist, and even social democratic elements, who were blacklisted, jailed, deported, or otherwise marginalized.
What was left after the purge was a union movement that had learned the hard lessons of a paranoid, right-wing government: negotiate on behalf of your members for better working conditions, but don’t even think of trying to influence politics.
While other countries developed labour-based political parties that had the resources to pull the political centre of gravity to the left and openly demanded broadly progressive social policies (like higher minimum wages, universal health care, liberal morality laws, and less aggressive foreign policies), the US was left with two parties, both financed by sectors of big business, with superficially different but substantially equivalent values and policies.
Another problem with American politics is the winner-take-all, first-past-the-post (FPTP) electoral system. FPTP is designed to give disproportionate weight to mainstream parties and to marginalize and under-represent alternative parties. Those few countries that still practice FPTP have more conservative governments and lower rates of voter participation - voters know that a vote for a progressive party is essentially wasted.
If the US followed most of the rest of the industrialized world and adopted some form of proportional representation, it would be easier for third parties representing real alternatives to attract votes.
A third problem with American politics is that the corporate newsmedia serve the same interests as the two corporate parties, and use relentless propaganda to perpetuate the current system. One element of this is for the two parties to pretend they are dramatically different. For example, both parties have a vested interest in pretending that the Democrats are left-wing. Thus we see surreal artifacts like the conservative corporatist Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) on a t-shirt with the text “RE-DEFEAT COMMUNISM”.
The practical upshot is that many policies that other countries simply take for granted are not “politically realistic” in the US, which means the sectors of big business that form policy in the two parties do not support them. Further, the government essentially serves as an adjunct of corporate power, funneling hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies to big business via the Pentagon system, energy subsidies, agri-business subsidies, the War on Drugs and prison-industrial complex, aggressive deregulation of the telecommunications and media industries, and various other proto-fascist schemes.
Occasionally there is thought-provoking material on Reddit.
You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here