
A pseudodrome is basically a palindrome with words instead of letters. I suspect there might be a different word for it because a google search only reveals a few pages on pseduodromes mostly derived from one source.
Panglossian
adj.
Blindly or naively optimistic.
[After Pangloss, an optimist in Candide, a satire by Voltaire.]
dik·tat \dik-ˈtät\ n
Peace treaty dictated under duress. Name the Nazis gave the Versailles Treaty.
The interesting thing about visiting california is that I am simultaneously delighted by the smell of ocean rolling in off the breakers and infuriated that nothing noteworthy is open past 9pm.
Two days ago I ate at the worst taqueria in santa cruz, it’s still twice as good as anything in new york.
au·toch·tho·nous
ADJECTIVE:
1. Originating where found; indigenous.
My view is that this is an arduous word barely worth using in conversation or writing. It’s probably good to know what it means when you see it.

It turns out that Alligators are hopelessly enamored with marshmallows. There are even tours through Louisiana and Florida where people can purportedly feed alligators by hand. Coming from a guy with only nine fingers, that is probably one of the dumbest fucking things I’ve heard of in months.
This actually makes a lot of sense if you know a little something about sugar:
“[W]hen rats were allowed to choose mutually-exclusively between water sweetened with saccharin-an intense calorie-free sweetener-and intravenous cocaine-a highly addictive and harmful substance-the large majority of animals (94%) preferred the sweet taste of saccharin. The preference for saccharin was not attributable to its unnatural ability to induce sweetness without calories because the same preference was also observed with sucrose, a natural sugar. Finally, the preference for saccharin was not surmountable by increasing doses of cocaine and was observed despite either cocaine intoxication, sensitization or intake escalation-the latter being a hallmark of drug addiction.”, wrote the researchers.
“Our findings clearly demonstrate that intense sweetness can surpass cocaine reward, even in drug-sensitized and -addicted individuals.” they concluded. Still, some researchers point out that these conclusions could not be applied directly to humans. Humans are generally aware that something they’re ingesting could get them “hooked” and that the effects could harm them. Rats, on the other hand, lack this awareness and are driven only by the sensations produced by a chemical.
Another issue: sugar, with all its potential cavity-inducing and obesity havoc, is still a nutrient, whereas cocaine’s benefits for the body are non existent. Still, refined sugars (like, sucrose, fructose) did not enter in the human diet until very recently in our history. The overconsumption of diets rich in refined sugars, combined with other factors, is the main cause that determines the current obesity epidemic. Overconsumption of refined sugar rich foods or beverages is initially determined by the pleasure of feeling that sweet taste, and which acts like a drug addiction.
I found an interesting and strangely touching article in the NYtimes on an alligator trapper in the everglades. Lots of fun fackts.
-In 1977 alligators were endangered, now there are over 15 million of them in Florida alone.
This snapshot of San Francisco as a city teeming with homeless junkies is not entirely inaccurate. Of course, the reasons fox news presents [secular progressivism] are totally off. The reasons for homelessness in the city are unsurprisingly more complex. My research indicates that the single biggest problem is simply that homeless people from all over the country come to San Francisco. Essentially, SF is tasked with a federal sized problem on a municipal budget. It’s not that the city government adores crack smoke wafting over the tenderloin, the city simply lacks the resources to deal with it. The city has rejected as broadly irrational the notion that jailing drug addicts is either rational or cost effective but has failed to come up with a better solution. 1/2 way there.
blah blah blah, Jurassic park, etc etc
If the genome of an extinct species can be reconstructed, biologists can work out the exact DNA differences with the genome of its nearest living relative. There are talks on how to modify the DNA in an elephant’s egg so that after each round of changes it would progressively resemble the DNA in a mammoth egg. The final-stage egg could then be brought to term in an elephant mother, and mammoths might once again roam the Siberian steppes.
yes yes, michael crichton lives on through his books yada yada
WTF!?!?!?!?! then the article just drops the subject and talks about mammoths for a while until the end. get this
whuh? that is fucking crazy.
:: NYTimes article via Email (thanks Mr. Gordon!!!) ::
:: The Daily Telegraph via Boing Boing Via Google Reader Via email (Thanks Matt Gutenhosen!!) ::
CNN Talking Head Guy Anderson Cooper moderates the following beatdown.
Okay, this is how these shows should work:
-Every point each speaker makes is recorded on a sidebar
-Each counterpoint should be recorded on a sidebar
-Each citation of fact should be immediately googled
Then the participants get kicked off and the producers go through and reasonably discuss the validity of the points made. They declare a winner and then mock the loser over cocktails. When can I have my own show?
I think the past tense of lack should be laught instead of lacked. I doubt anyone will ever adopt this standard at least partially because I have zero reasons for it. Just sayin.
in other news:
The student volunteers didn’t realize when the experiment started. They showed up at Yale University’s psychology building and met their contact near the elevators. She was holding some textbooks and a cup of coffee. The woman with the coffee was [part of the experiment]. She knew what she was supposed to do, but she didn’t know why. One by one, she took the students up to the fourth floor in an elevator. As they rode up, the woman asked students, “in a pretty innocuous way, if they wouldn’t mind holding her coffee cup while she wrote down some information,” Williams explained.
Half the students got to hold hot coffee; half got iced coffee. They held the cup for only a few seconds. But that short experience must have changed something in their brains. When they arrived at the fourth floor, they filled out questionnaires. They read a short description of a hypothetical person — Person A — and they had to evaluate this stranger’s personality.
Here’s where the coffee’s influence became apparent. “Participants who held the hot coffee cup rated this Person A as more generous, more social, happier, better natured” than participants who held the iced coffee cup, Williams said. Williams thinks it’s no coincidence that we use the same word — warmth — to describe both a physical and an emotional experience. Somewhere in the brain, those two sensations are linked, he says. And you can imagine why: Think of a baby held in its mother’s arms. The child is experiencing love, affection, comfort.
“But you also have, at the same time, an experience with a warm object, in that case a warm human being,” Williams said.
:: Full Article via A Real Live Conversation (Thanks Amy!!) ::
Now get off the internet and go give someone a hug.
At some point, in whatever I got that might pass for a college education, I studied economics. The key thing that I learned in this process (aside from the fact that economics is bullshit and that I wasted my time learning about it in an institutional setting) was that economists love bow ties. While envisioning this post I was trying to come up with a way to show this objectively but I realized that would take too much time. However, I have met and talked with 4 nobel prize winning economists (Arrow, Sen, Stiglitz, Krugman). Of those, 3 were wearing bowties (those also happen to the be the 3 I argued with*). Basically, I’ve hung out with a lot of economists, so just take my word for it: They fucking love bow ties. This baffled me for years. Initially, I just thought it was because most economists have a functionally autistic** understanding of interpersonal interaction and can barely dress themselves but I finally decided that economists love bow-ties because they are more economical than regular ties. think about that.
* Arrow is a billion times smarter than I am and it was pointless but fun. For the record, he’s also one of the most hilarious and lovable people I’ve ever met. (vint cerfbeing perhaps the second most lovable person I’ve ever met, followed closely by, of all people, Douglas Feith (one of the main architects of the war in iraq)) Stiglitz is a million times smarter than I am but I caught him saying something stupid. Krugman is probably 5 million times smarter than I am and I didn’t get to talk to him for that long.
**These are people that are baffled by tipping
This last bit is made all the more interesting because janitors frequently cross border fences to get here.
:: Wikipedia via Email (thanks JFace!) ::
34. People driving on sidewalks and then honking at me when I get in their way, like I am the one in the wrong place. I am not sure what people want me to do in these situations. Am I supposed to go into the street? I generally just ignore them and stand in their way, because it’s a fucking sidewalk.
35. Inconsistent bureaucratic bullshit. My visa says it’s valid for one year, but also says that I can only stay for 30 days. My roommate and another American girl out here got the problem solved relatively quickly by getting a letter from the American Embassy and American Councils (respectively), going to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and resubmitting their passports. Figuring this was a good idea, I also obtained a letter from the American Embassy, the exact same letter my roommate got (with my name replacing her name), only to be DENIED a visa because I didn’t have the proper documents. WTF?!
You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here