Archive for the 'Dictators' Category

9/11+5: 3 for GWB

Monday, September 11th, 2006

I listened to our esteemed psuedo-President give 15 minutes of vague, stern yet feel good yammering on the drive home from work tonight. Much of what he said was difficult to disagree with, that America cannot stand by as terrorists seek to kill our citizens and tear our nation down, that people the world over should have free governments which serve them rather than repress and control them.

But these are straw man arguments, punching at paper bags rather than working for the unity Bush claims we must have. So here are three questions, the answers to which are not subject to handwaving, asked as if he’d held a press conference or town hall meeting:

President Bush, you spent a good portion of your address tonight on the need for democracy to flourish in the Middle East as part of the solution to our current problems. Could you detail for us the discussions you and your Cabinet have had with the Saudi royal family and President Mubarek, and other efforts made by the executive branch to bring democracy as we understand it to Saudi Arabia and Egypt? President Bush, as you mentioned the brave men and women of our Armed Forces very quickly drove the Taliban from power in Afghanistan. How come more opium has been harvested in 2006 than in any prior year? President Bush, you called for Americans to unite to fight what you said was the great conflict of the 21st century. How do you expect Americans who are not Republicans to unite behind you when members of your Aministration–including Vice President Cheney–publicly claim that supporting Democratic Party candidates like Ned Lamont is providing support and encouragement to Al Qaeda? Doesn’t inflammatory rhetoric such as this divide and belittle Democratic supporters instead of bringing them into a united community?

Where are the mainstream media reporters, who after all are the ones who have access, on asking these questions? I admit this is just a guess but I don’t believe the White House would issue me, or Karl, or Garret a press pass for the next press conference.

Censorship’s bad, m’kay?

Thursday, July 20th, 2006

Amnesty International, with the support of The Observer UK newspaper, is launching a campaign to show that online or offline the human voice and human rights are impossible to repress. I agree with the aims and tactics, so I added the campaign awareness widget on the top of the sidebar. For a much better explanation of what this is all about than I can offer, read Rebecca Blood’s post China, the Internet & Human Rights - a long analysis.

You are the company you keep

Saturday, April 15th, 2006

Foreign Policy’s editors blog is fairly new but they seem to be getting in the swing pretty quickly as you can see in Brutal dictator, welcome to Washington. The post calls out the hypocrisy of the Bush Crew, talking out of both sides of their mouth as usual when it comes to the interests of their oil industry puppetmasters. When Parade Magazine lists you in its Ten Worst Dictators list (I mean seriously, Parade Magazine!) you know the guy must be up to something seriously bad. But Condi shows just how far she’s sunk from her sunny Stanford days by sweetly introducing the guy to the press.

Free speech as long as you don’t piss of the Chinese

Wednesday, January 4th, 2006

Scoble does stand up against the Microsoft Machine on the censorship of Michael Anti though his response in the comments is underwhelming. Unlike apparent official blog spokesperson Michael Connolly, product unit manager for MSN Spaces, who gives a mealymouthed explanation of Microsoft’s position of why the company took down this pro-China democracy blog.

This is a tough issue which both Google and Yahoo have previously faced and also handled poorly, not to point the finger only at MSFT. It’s one which we need to find a better answer as a culture; as one of Scoble’s commenters said, why are we fighting for democracy in the Middle East but allowing US-flagged corporations to toss it aside as they like elswhere?
[cross-posted]

1/5/06: InformationWeek has the official Microsoft response. Still weak.

Bush: Whatever I say is okay, okay?

Sunday, December 18th, 2005

I have no doubt that there are groups out there, al Qaeda and the like, that would really like to crack our comfortable lifestyles into a zillion little bloody pieces. I also am sure there are many good men and women in our armed forces, intelligence services and other related groups (in and out of the government) doing their best to prevent it. However, I don’t understand when we changed the constitution so that just because Bush Says He Ordered Domestic Spying, that makes violating the fourth amendment okay. Just imagine what his most ardent supporters would say–or do–if the President came on TV one night and said:

“My fellow Americans, the terrorist are able to get guns and other weapons too easily inside our own country. In order to protect our peaceful nation I am therefore issuing an executive order banning private ownership of guns. All guns within our borders must be turned into your local police department within 30 days. We have compiled a database based on registrations, gun and ammunition purchases, NRA membership and similar sources and will use it to ensure that this order is complied with. I know that some of you won’t agree with my decision but we live in troubled times and must do whatever is necessary to win the War on Terror. Thank you for your support. God bless and good night.”

Sunday, June 12th, 2005

Scoble goes sideways on Microsoft in China. Gotta disagree with him–and also on his penchant for commenting on the intersection of Microsoft and politics in ways that just smack me as not being his true beliefs.

10 days, who remembers that far back?

Monday, May 16th, 2005

Now I’m not one to expect President Bush to act up to his claims, not me, but Mercury News columnist Daniel Sneider sees things differently and calls him to task for looking the other way on Uzbekistan. Really, Dan, how can you expect our government to trade the convenience of an air base on the Afghan border for democratic principles.

“We have been encouraging the Karimov government to make reforms, to make the system more open,” was the definitive US response delivered by SecState Rice. Who can quibble?

Taking Media Risks in a Dictatorship

Thursday, May 12th, 2005

The inestimable Dan Gillmor points to (Taking Media Risks in a Dictatorship) a blog by a group of people who instantly impress me with their determination to battle a monster. This is Zimbabwe, published by the Sokwanele Civic Action Support Group, is an audacious attempt by people in Zimbabwe to use whatever tools they can find to free their nation from Robert Mugabe.

I think this group is a fine subject for the first post in this new blog as well as offering an example of how the cheap and simple technology of the web can change the patterns and constraints of past eras. To the 16 anonymous contributors to This is Zimbabwe, remember the lyrics of a song born out of the American Civil Rights movement in the 1960s, a reworking of an gospel tune that probably originated in Africa:

Hold on, Hold on,
Keep your eyes on the prize,
Hold on. Hold on.



You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

How do you rate mobile version of this page?

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser