« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

The Reformers were trapped within geographic Christendom, while their Catholic counterparts were engaged in colonial expansion. Protestant “mission†became missions to Catholics. While Protestants focused on Catholics, Catholic missions flourished.
Pre-Reformation confessions referred to the church as “one holy, apostolic church.†Such is not found in the confessions of the Reformation. Instead, the Reformation confessions reacted to the errors of apostolic succession. By de-emphasizing the “apostolic†nature of the church, the Reformers also diminished the apostolic-sending nature of the church. The church that “reformed†lost touch with the God who sends, and the mission of the church suffered. (Ed Stetzer, Planting New Churches in a Postmodern Age, p. 23)
While this quote is a broad over-simplification, for example, the colonial mission of Roman Catholicism was also part o Christendom, it is a thought-provoking critique of the first 200 years of Protestantism.
This is an important article about the Church in Nigeria and Africa. This line is astounding:
With 300,000 people worshipping at a single service at the Canaanland headquarters alone and 300 branches across the country, Living Faith is one of Nigeria’s megachurches
The move of the Gospel in Sub-Saharan Africa is immense, disturbing, and thrilling.

Two years ago I had many friends and associates scoff when I said the housing market in the U.S. was in Bubbleville. Now this from the Financial Times:
The connection between the bursting of the housing bubble and the fragility of the financial system has created huge dangers, for the US and the rest of the world.
The rest of the scray article is found here. Now if we get a Dem in the White House who wants to enact all kinds of goofy New Dealish stuff all bets are off to the downside.

Okay, so we're Reformed and the traditional Reformed clerical uniform for worship is the Geneva Robe as seen here on Calvin himself. Note that he has on a white banded collar shirt. So, bell sleeves, white banded collar underneath. Well, who sells this? No one. We had these but one still wears a shirt and tie underneath and so you have a robe over a businessman's uniform. Since nobody makes it just so, we improvised. I took our robes in to a tailor and had him sew small inserts into the collar to "round out" the collar. Then we wear white collared shirts underneath. This makes it easy for visitors to find the pastor after the service too. Here is how the finished product looks. Total cost? About $20.

The growing pressure upon the Archbishop of Canterbury is interesting in several respects:
1. Presbyterians who pooh-pooh Episcopal governance may want to notice that having a face to attach a "buck stops here" is impressive given the recent tendency in Presbyterianism to attribute actions to nameless, faceless committees. "Well, that's just the will of session....presbytery....GA....and there's nothing I can do about it."
2. Where does NT Wright stand on all this and is he in play as the next Archbishop of Canterbury? Whether you agree with him on certain doctrinal peculiarities or not he is a genuine (though left wing) conservative.
You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here