Ph: 24297230
skip to main | skip to sidebar

Saturday, November 15, 2008

750 Volts: Posts Some Shocking Results

Our good friend over at 750 Volts, Kenton Ngo, has a great map of the 2008 election results in the 42nd District. Check it out.

750 Volts, The Food Stamp Nation

Even the precinct where he grew up, Irving, went more blue. In the entire district, 12 out of 15 precincts went for and Barack ObamaJoe Biden. Delegate Dave Albo cannot be happy.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Albo Fiddles, While Planet Albo Burns....

The most recent election bring a healthy dose of hope to the long-suffering residents of the 42nd District. Several writers have commented that the 42nd House of Delegates District voted 57% for Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Well, it's actually better than that. First, that only considers the presidential vote, but not other candidates.

Barack Obama received 56.98% in-person vote in the 42nd District
Mark Warner received 65.34% in-person vote in the 42nd District
Gerry Connolly received 54.75% in-person vote in the 42nd District

Why else is it better than that? Nearly 15% of all votes cast in the 42nd were absentee votes. The 11th Congressional District Absentee votes were 4-8% higher for the Democratic candidate than the in-person voters. In other words, one should add at least 2-3% to all of these numbers.

So what was Del. Dave Albo's reaction? "'No 60 votes!' Del. David B. Albo [R - Abuser Fees] said. 'Then you know you're reaching for a low reason to party.'" Emotional Day Ends In Jubilation for Some, Stoicism for Others, Washington Post (Nov. 5, 2008). You can say that again.

But why not more? Strange we haven't had more spin or denial from Del. Dave Albo yet. We were hoping to hear some great quotes about how the 42nd District's voters want abuser fees, favor smoking in restaurants, don't expect to be bound by silly things like Constitutions, how PTA polling place cookie sales are still a critical issue for 42nd District voters, worry about the menace posted by boxcutter possession or fireplace smoke, why all of these new Fairfax County Democratic voters are on food stamps, or how government regulation of public utilities is "communist." [EDITOR'S NOTE - THIS IS NOT A JOKE. THESE ARE ALL POSITIONS DELEGATE ALBO HAS TAKEN AND WORKED ON]

C'mon Delegate! Keep fiddling while Rome burns. We expect nothing less.

Friday, October 03, 2008

Foodstamps Up - Time for Albo to Call the Election

This just in from The Washington Post - food stamp requests are up by 40,000 people in Virginia - from 517,101 to 556,134 according to the Washington Post. Remember what Del. Dave Albo's theory was about the Democratic Party's surge in Fairfax County?
State Del David B. Albo [(R-Abuser Fees)] argues it is not the highly educated who have turned Fairfax blue. "My bet is that it's those who are on food stamps and government services who tend to be more Democratic," he said.
Del. Dave Albo sure must be getting nervous.

Hey, why aren't all of the pundits saying game over in Virginia?

Monday, September 15, 2008

Albo: Moving to Richmond?

We have previously focused on Del. Dave Albo's fundraising habits as part of airing out his record on this blog.


It's now 2008 and Del. Dave Albo is having a pretty good year. In the first half of 2008, Del. Dave Albo took in $28,449 in campaign contributions. So how much of it came from real people (as opposed to corporations or special interests)???

$0

What jurisdiction provided Del. Dave Albo with most of his contributions for the first half of 2008?

The City of Richmond

After analyzing these results it sure looks like Del. Dave Albo is planning on running for Mayor of Richmond. We wish him luck.

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Albo "Foolish" On Immigration

Last month, we brought you news about how Delegate Albo's demagoguery on illegal immigration was an big government scare tactic that cost the taxpayers thousands of dollars for little return.

Five days later, The Daily Press hammered Delegate Albo for the same thing in this editorial.
Legislative Window Dressing Won't Fix the Problem
The General Assembly has been playing "Let's pretend." And it's making somebody look foolish. A law the legislature passed earlier this year just took effect, requiring local jails to check the immigration status of any inmate who's foreign-born or not a U.S. citizen.

Perhaps legislators think this will make a difference in reducing illegal immigration. In which case they're foolish. Or they think voters are so thick or inattentive that they'll buy the illusion that, by passing such laws, legislators are on this problem. If voters do, they're foolish.

Requiring local jailers to ask every prisoner about their birthplace and citizenship, to verify with federal officials the immigration status of those who aren't native-born or citizens, and to include the information in the criminal history file, doesn't accomplish much. It isn't going to get any more immigrants deported.

In Virginia, most local sheriffs were already reporting to Immigration and Customs Enforcement the names of inmates they though were here illegally. Maybe they didn't report everyone, but only those who committed a major offense. By and large, though, they didn't think much of the response they got from ICE.

Local jails can send over as many names as they want, but ICE has only so much manpower to go through all the steps to get someone deported. The agency detains only a small fraction of the people police report to it, and officials have made it clear they're going to focus on felons. As well they should, since resources are limited.

And will continue to be. It would be hard to imagine the resources required to track down and deport the 12 million people said to be in this country illegally, or the kind of police-state mentality that would prevail if sufficient resources were allocated and swung into action.

So it's likely that illegal immigrants who commit misdemeanors - and even some felons - aren't going anywhere. So much for the claim by the bill's co-sponsor and State Crime Commission Chairman Dave Albo, R-Fairfax, that, "With our new law, these people who are here illegally should be afraid of living anywhere in Virginia."

Do legislators think voters are naive enough to fall for the idea that this kind of window dressing makes a dent in a national problem?

Effective solutions to immigration lie on two fronts. First, better enforcement by federal agencies - at the border, and keeping track of people who come in legally and overstay visas.

And second, a recognition that in some areas, local economics run the way citizens want them to - with essential services provided at the prices they want to pay - because immigrants come to do the jobs. If citizens don't want that, they need to find ways to get Americans or legal immigrants to do them, which might involve revising welfare programs that reduce the need to work, and paying more for some jobs - and understanding that higher pay could drive up the prices they pay.

From a broader perspective, we face a problem of legal immigration. The number of visas that our country is willing to offer immigrants - in the thousands - is laughably, pathetically short of the demand, which is in the millions.

Passing wishful-thinking laws and taking down names won't solve the problem. They can't. They might make some foolish people feel good, but they don't get at the causes of the problem. Daily Press (Aug. 1, 2008).
Good work Daily Press.
 


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

How do you rate mobile version of this page?

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser