Ponderables:
1. The nicest thing about the future is that it always starts tomorrow.
2. Money will buy a fine dog, but only kindness will make him wag his tail.
3. If you don’t have a sense of humor, you probably don’t have any sense at all.
4. Seat belts are not as confining as wheelchairs.
5. A good time to keep your mouth shut is when you’re in deep water.
6. How come it takes so little time for a child who is afraid of the dark to become a teenager who wants to stay out all night?
7. Business conventions are important because they demonstrate how many people a company can operate without.
8. Why is it that at class reunions you feel younger than everyone else looks?
9. Scratch a dog and you’ll find a permanent job.
10. No one has more driving ambition than the boy who wants to buy a car.
11. There are no new sins; the old ones just get more publicity.
12. There are worse things than getting a call for a wrong number at 4 AM. It could be a right number.
13. No one ever says “It’s only a game” when his team is winning.
14. I’ve reached the age where the happy hour is a nap.
15. Be careful reading the fine print. There’s no way you’re going to like it.
16. The trouble with bucket seats is that not everybody has the same size bucket.
17. Do you realize that in about 40 years, we’ll have thousands of OLD LADIES running around with tattoos? (And RAP music will be the Golden Oldies!)
18. Money can’t buy happiness — but somehow it’s more comfortable to cry in a Corvette than in a Yugo.
19. After a certain age, if you don’t wake up aching in every joint, you are probably dead.
i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno’t mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
This has been around for a while, but it’s interesting. The “rules” say the first and last letters should be correct, but that’s not necessarily so with three letter words. You can still read them OK too.
Here are some thoughts I don't have time to develop, but at least wanted to document in seminal form. If you wish to inquire, I will elaborate.
Every child in every generation in every family has been faced with the same decision as Adam and Eve in the Garden: will you trust your parents and depend on them for your moral compass, or will you instead attempt to secure the knowledge of good and evil from your own personal experiences. Sadly, every child chooses the same as Adam and Eve, and consequently, seeing their own nakedness and feeling their own shame. The best hope of parents is to delay this "crossing" for as long as possible to where the consequences of a child's actions are the most comprehensible and the least durable.
_____
There are words, and generally they are large words, whose meanings are difficult to explain but critical to grasp for everyone who desires to live well. Some of these words are:
Appropriate Credibility Mature Discretion
To learn to speak with discretion, maintain one's credibility, to behave appropriately, and to handle defeat or disappointment in a mature way, for example, should be the goal and hope of all men and women of character.
_____
Quotable Prager Lines (food for thought):
When a child asks, "Why? Don't you trust me?", the best response is, "I don't trust human nature." The heart of the Torah is based on the command to love the stranger. The other sex is the ultimate stranger. As a man, I have more in common with a tribesman from a remote people with whom I cannot speak because he is a male than I do with my own wife. Society should be focused on determining what is good for the whole. In light of the recent judicial activism, I wonder "how far will society bend for the individual?"
"Fairy tales are the only true accounts that man has ever given of his destiny. ‘Jack the Giant-Killer’ is the embodiment of the first of the three great paradoxes by which men live. It is the paradox of Courage: the paradox which says, ‘You must defy the thing that is terrifying; unless you are frightened, you are not brave.’ ‘Cinderella’ is the embodiment of the second of the paradoxes by which men live: the paradox of Humility which says ‘Look for the best in the thing, ignorant of its merit; he that abases himself shall be exalted’. And ‘Beauty and the Beast’ is the embodiment of the third of the paradoxes by which men live: the paradox of Faith - the absolutely necessary and wildly unreasonable maxim which says to every mother with a child or to every patriot with a country, ‘You must love the thing first and make it lovable afterwards.’" [GKC's essay for Sept 27 1904 in The World, excerpted in Maycock's The Man Who Was Orthodox]
You must love the thing first and make it lovable afterwards. Could this not equally apply to a child or a nation?
I'm trying to find out more about Thomas Sowell since I've been reading one of his books, and my friend Jeremy has also been plowing through several himself. This many has honestly captured my thoughts. Well I found this site and stumbled onto a page of his favorite quotes. Here are a few that I found particularly poignant:
The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance. It is humbling to discover how many of our glib assumptions, which seem to us novel and plausible, have been tested before, not once but many times and in innumerable guises; and discovered to be, at great human cost, wholly false. --Paul Johnson Everybody has asked the question. . ."What shall we do with the Negro?" I have had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are wormeaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! I am not for tying or fastening them on the tree in any way, except by nature's plan, and if they will not stay there, let them fall. And if the Negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone! --Frederick Douglass Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. -- C. S. Lewis Alas, how many have been persecuted for the wrong of having been right? --Jean-Baptiste Say
Here is an example of why I enjoy Dennis Prager. In his recent article he details the last 7 day's headlines from around the world, and then concludes:
"These are only the news items of the last seven days. I purposely chose a period without dramatic headlines. And, of course, no news came out of North Korea, which continues to be the world's largest concentration camp. Cubans continue to have no freedom. Iranians continue to be whipped and killed for sexual improprieties. Saudi women continue to be forced to be invisible in public and live a demeaned status.
The world is filled with evil. Always has been. The biggest difference today is that, thanks to communications, we are far more aware of much of it.
I am convinced that human evil is so great that most people choose either to ignore it or to focus their concerns elsewhere -- like those who believe that human-created carbon dioxide emission, not human evil, poses the greatest threat to mankind. No one will ever get killed for fighting global warming. Fighting evil, on the other hand, is quite dangerous."
This echoes one of the points of my Master's Thesis, which I personally found quite insightful:
St. Cyprian wrote to his friend in North Africa in the third century admitting from his “fair garden under the shadow of these vines” that the world looked cheerful. Yet he also knew that if he were to step away from the shade of his comfort, he would see that “It is really a bad world Donatus, an incredibly bad world” (The Good News About Injustice, 40). Gary Haugen, founder of International Justice Mission and chief U.N. inspector in Rwanda after the 1994 genocide, regrettably speaks for many of us when he confesses that in his “domesticated garden the fall is being managed” and the only use for the armor of God is “for fighting weeds, backyard pests and trespassers.” Like Haugen, we also are “caught totally off guard when the true nature of ‘the world’ passes before [our] eyes” (46, 49).
All of this brought to mind another quote I saw on the Chesterton blog back on 9/11/06. May we always be as clear about our surroundings as GK Chesterton, who stated: "I am never surprised at any work of hell" ["The God of the Gongs" in The Wisdom of Father Brown].
I collect quotes and have a computer file where they are all organized. Today as I was looking up one to offer to a friend, I re-read this one and just had to air it out and hang it on the line for the rest of you. A.W. Tozer was a prophet of his time, and ours, I believe. Reading what he writes generally makes me want to shout AMEN!
"Some preachers have such a phobia for repetition and such an unnatural fear of the familiar that they are forever straining after the odd and the startling. The church page of the newspaper almost any Saturday will be sure to announce at least one or two sermon topics so far astray as to be positively grotesque; only by the most daring flight of uncontrolled imagination can any relation be established between the topic and the religion of Christ. We dare not impugn the honesty or the sincerity of the men who thus flap their short wings so rapidly in an effort to take off into the wild blue yonder, but we do deplore their attitudes. No one should try to be more original than an apostle." God Tells the Man Who Cares, 144.
I actually see this today quite often when preachers toss out some "novel nugget of truth" which can quite easily be found in an email forward that everyone gets in their daily junk folder. These catch phrases, these slogans, these one-liners, these mantras, these sound bites, these witty contrivances that are intended to accomplish the equivalent of a oratorical sugar high, most often just make me sick to my stomach.
Where is the serious man?
For the life of me I cannot recall which blog I was reading that strongly recommended this little pamphlet, but I believed them and bought it -- and loved it. Guinness actually wrote this in 1989 and it is just as relevant today as I'm sure it was back then. The subtitle is "The Church and the Challenge of Society." Guinness opens by stating, "Speak intelligently for more than two minutes and with more than one thought in each, and you are considered dangerously intellectual and unspiritual.... We must forswear simple answers to tough questions and be prepared to pray, think and sweat intellectually in order to see where we are and what the Lord would have us do. One of the most momentous of these questions is this: How should the church today be related to society today?" (3).
He explains, "The purpose of this pamphlet is to set out first principles and general guidelines" related to this issue. Guinness then offers (1) 2 Perspectives, (2) 2 Principles, (3) 2 Great Deficiencies, (4) 2 Reminders of where we are today, (5) 2 Requirements in relation to society, and (6) 2 Requirements in relation to the Lord.
In summary:
1 - "Society is always and everywhere two things at once: God's gift to us and the Devil's gauntlet thrown down before us, to challenge us to worship him and not Christ.... The world is simply our hearts writ large. Our hearts are simply the world writ small. So our view of society needs to be deeply realistic."
2 - There is both a protagonist and antagonist relationship with society. Christ is over all and over against all. "In short, God and the world stand crosswise. We are in the world, but not of it. To be faithful to him, we have to be foreign to the world."
3 - We have broken the link between belief and behavior and between the private and public world of faith. "From the Hallmark-card theology of a thousand churches to the nauseating nonsense of PTL, American evangelicalism is awash in a sloppy, sentimental, superficial theology that wouldn't empower a clockwork mouse, let alone a disciple of Christ in the tough, modern world."
4 - "...the United States is approaching the close of a generation-long crisis of cultural authority [remember this was written in '89]. After the great sixties' lurch in directions liberal, radical and secular came the great eighties' counter-lurch in directions conservative, traditional and religious. Now, with the failure of both revolutions on their own terms, we enter the showdown years that will reveal which faiths, which world views and which moral principles are going to prove decisive in shaping the nation over the next generations."
5 - We need a Christian mind and a public philosophy. "Failure to 'think Christianly' is the Achilles' heel of English-speaking evangelicalism.... When will we face the fact that our deep-rooted anti-intellectualism is worse than ineffective? It is sub-Christian, disobedient, antispiritual and unloving. Only when we root out the last traces of it can we hope to exercise the public influence that faithfulness to Christ demands." "Christian justice is not justice for Christians. It is justice for everybody.... The public is tired of the trench warfare over religion and public life. But if we are not careful, the danger is of a great sea change in public attitudes. Instead of faith and freedom being viewed as blood brothers, as they have been for two hundred years, they will come to be viewed as in opposing corners--with titanic implications for the gospel and for the nation."
6 - What we need most is "God Himself... - a proclamation of the Word and a visitation of the Spirit." "Having visited almost all the countries in the English-speaking world, I would say that I know none where the churches are more full and the sermons more empty than in America.... I am never hungrier and rarely angrier than when I come out of an American evangelical church after what passes for the preaching of the Word of God.... The real problem is that in what is said there is almost no sense of announcement from God; and in what is shown, there is almost no sense of anointing by God."
Referencing a speech by Paul Weyrich, a leading conservative strategist, called 'Taking Stock',
"Even if we conservatives win our entire agenda, we've lost." He shocked his audience further. "Yes," he said, "abortion, school prayer...win them all, and we will still have failed." Why? Because social change has changed too much, political change can change too little. Culture is flowing away faster than any piecemeal action can remedy. Nothing short of a total cultural transformation of America will do. Curiously, evangelicals a generation ago would have taken that as a truism. But in a day when political activism is in vogue, many who used to pray confidently, realistically and practically for revival no longer have that hunger for a visitation from God."
"The ultimate factor in the church's engagement with society is the church's engagement with God."
And I shout, "AMEN!"
'O God, be Thou exalted over my possessions. Nothing of earth's treasures shall seem dear unto me if only Thou art glorified in my life. Be Thou exalted over my friendships. I am determined that Thou shalt be above all, though I must stand deserted and alone in the midst of the earth. Be Thou exalted above my comforts. Though it mean the loss of bodily comforts and the carrying of heavy crosses, I shall keep my vow made this day before Thee. Be Thou exalted over my reputation. Make me ambitious to please Thee even if as a result I must sink into obscurity and my name be forgotten as a dream. Rise, O Lord, into Thy proper place of honor, above my ambitions, above my likes and dislikes, above my family, my health and even my life itself. Let me decrease that Thou mayest increase; let me sink that Thou mayest rise above. Ride forth upon me as Thou didst ride into Jerusalem mounted upon the humble little beast, a colt, the foal of an ass, and let me hear the children cry to Thee, 'Hosanna in the highest.'" A.W. Tozer, The Pursuit of God, 101-102.
...or choosing only certain pieces of information that support your premise in order to defend your position. This is the first skill necessary to be a politician. I find it kind of ironic that the story told about the greatest American President, George Washington, is regarding his not being able to tell a lie regarding chopping down a cherry tree. His character revealed by his confession. Yet, today, cherry picking (a lesser "crime" for sure) indicates a lack of character.
My only point is that I don't agree. EVERYONE picks cherries! I suppose some can do it with the sheer intent to deceive, and this is wrong. But the average person chooses the cherries that seem to be consistent with the world as they understand it. The cherries that don't fit, the ones that seem suspicious or incongruent, are set aside (not discarded) until other information gives them a place.
Thomas Sowell, in A Conflict of Visions, explains that everyone has a worldview, a perspective, a "vision" of how the world works, which we use to understand and assimilate new information and govern present actions. He explains,
"Visions are all, to some extent, simplistic--though that is a term usually reserved for other people's visions, not our own. The ever-changing kaleidoscope of raw reality would defeat the human mind by its complexity, except for the mind's ability to abstract, to pick out parts and think of them as the whole.... No matter what vision we build on, it will never account for 'every sparrow's fall.' ... Ultimately there are as many visions as there are human beings, if not more, and more than one vision may be consistent with a given fact. Theories can be devastated by facts but they can never be proved to be correct by facts. Facts force us to discard some theories --or else to torture our minds trying to reconcile the irreconcilable-- but they can never put the final imprimatur of ultimate truth on a given theory. What empirical verification can do is to reveal which of the competing theories currently being considered is more consistent with what is known factually" (5-7).
So, depending on the vision of the world you start with, or the current understanding of the facts on hand, you will most likely choose some cherries over others as you listen to a political speech, participate in a public discussion on some local issue, or argue some point with a friend. It's more about consistency with the worldview you start with than intentionally rejecting indisputable truth.
So, when politicians argue the pros and cons of tax cuts, entitlement programs, war, race issues, global warming, etc, it may be that they are knowingly distorting their opponents position by "cherry picking" only the perceived negative aspects, and by doing so, impugning their adversary's character. And they then do the exact opposite when presenting the evidence for their position, glossing over any known difficulties in the argument This situation is the most sinister aspect of cherry picking. But the average person, and I would say the average public servant, really is doing what they feel is best for their family, their constituents, and their country. I really believe this.
It's just sad when we can sit by and see the sinister working of politicians do what they do: claiming to have all virtue and altruism on their side and their opponent having none. That's the bad thing, but that's not cherry picking as much as it is politicking. I cannot tell a lie. Sometimes I wish that tree was chopped down and we could get some real statesmen into the seats of power of this great nation.
In his book Men Who Met God (p. 70), A.W. Tozer comments on Ex 3:1 “Now Moses was tending the flock of Jethro his father-in-law, the priest of Midian. And he led the flock to the back of the desert, and came to Horeb, the mountain of God”, stating:
We should quickly review here the kinds of preparation Moses had gone through for his leadership role under God. Reared in Pharaoh's palace, he had been educated in all the wisdom of the Egyptians. He had the prerequisites for almost any kind of career. In our day a man with his qualifications would be sought for election as a bishop or the president of any of the great church denominations.
Then, too, Moses had a most unusual but highly effective postgraduate course. God took him out of the activity and the noise of Egypt and placed him in the silence of the open spaces. He kept the flock of Jethro, his father-in-law. Tending the sheep, he learned lessons of meditation and observation that he could only have learned in the silence.
Probably more important than anything else, Moses learned to know himself. That knowledge was a part of God's preparation of the man for his future tasks. We, today, know everything but ourselves. We never really come to know ourselves because we cannot get quiet enough.
As you know, I generally take a personal retreat over New Year's Eve, and this was a timely reminder as wll as a source of hope for what may lie ahead in my future. God is always at work, even in the "desert" seasons.
Chuck Colson's commentary today was on the movie The Golden Compass. Below is an excerpt from his statements that have a broader impact regarding media/education in general.
"The somewhat simplistic message [from the movie] that emerges is, “Question authority.” But as the Ignatius Press blog points out, it comes across more like “Question authority. Just not our authority.” That is, we are supposed to accept the film’s assertions about what religion is like as, well, the gospel.
But it is just a story, isn’t it? Of course, it is. But as Philip Pullman himself once wrote, “‘Thou shalt not’ might reach the head, but it takes ‘Once upon a time’ to reach the heart.” That is exactly the point made in the new book THE PIED PIPER OF ATHEISM, which draws the connection between Pullman’s fantasy tales and the legendary figure who stole children away by playing music that appealed to their emotions.
No matter what the filmmakers meant to do, Pullman certainly intended to capture children’s hearts and plant the seed of doubt there. And the film, watered-down as it may be, cannot help but reflect that...."
A.W. Tozer refers to the famous quote by Socrates in his daily devotional today: "An unexamined life is not worth living." I have always appreciated this statement and appreciate Tozer's application of it while discussing Psalm 139:23,24 "Search me, O God, and know my heart; try me, and know my anxieties; and see if there is any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting."
The philosopher Socrates said, "An unexamined life is not worth living." If a common philosopher could think that, how much more we Christians ought to listen to the Holy Spirit when He says, "Examine yourself." An unexamined Christian lies like an unattended garden. Let your garden go unattended for a few months, and you will not have roses and tomatoes but weeds. An unexamined Christian life is like an unkempt house. Lock your house up as tight as you will and leave it long enough, and when you come back you will not believe the dirt that got in from somewhere. An unexamined Christian is like an untaught child. A child that is not taught will be a little savage. It takes examination, teaching, instruction, discipline, caring, tending, weeding and cultivating to keep the life right. Rut, Rot or Revival: The Condition of the Church, 43.