I took a usual stroll "down the wall" of new releases at Blockbuster the other night. Behind me in the procession was a young couple in their 30's. At one point the woman pointed to a video she had apparently been telling her man about, suggesting he consider it. He simply stated outloud - "It's a foreign film. Does that mean I have to read it?" At this his woman walked away, and he and I laughed out loud. He looked at me for support, saying "Did I just state the obvious? Isn't that what you would think?" I agreed and he went to find his woman to smooth things over, I would assume.
Well they came back my way as I had moved further down the wall and this time he pointed to a movie, explaining, "It's sort of a documentary." I didn't hear any response from her, but again she looked at the movie cover and walked away. Hearing the word "documentary", I interjected, "So does that mean the soundtrack sucks?" At this the man and I laughed out loud again.
Well, I made my way to the check out and happened to be right behind the couple. I didn't say anything but observed under the man's arm they had come to agree on the movie "What Happens in Vegas"! For those not familiar with this romantic comedy, it's basically about a couple who gets married in Vegas one night, but instead of allowing them to get divorced when they sober up and realize what they did, the judge forces them to stay married for 6 months first.
So much for cultural or educational viewing. But they tried. And I got a kick out of watching it.
Showing posts with label Gender Issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gender Issues. Show all posts
"Guy Church"
Here's an interesting article about the trend that most churches are populated by a majority of women. I appreciate the recognition of the problem (which I think it really is), but I don't agree with the solution most of the examples are promoting.
For example, ""We wanted it to feel like some guy's really, really cool home," albeit one with lots of high tech and a staff videographer, says David Parker, 121's associate pastor for worship and creative arts."
This seems to reflect a "Willowcreek" approach to church, which will only produce a consumerist mentality and a different problem in another 20 years. What about actually thinking through what the Church is supposed to be about and then designing what we do based on what God intended it to be, not some "really, really cool" hunting lodge, or video arcade, or any such thing.
For example, ""We wanted it to feel like some guy's really, really cool home," albeit one with lots of high tech and a staff videographer, says David Parker, 121's associate pastor for worship and creative arts."
This seems to reflect a "Willowcreek" approach to church, which will only produce a consumerist mentality and a different problem in another 20 years. What about actually thinking through what the Church is supposed to be about and then designing what we do based on what God intended it to be, not some "really, really cool" hunting lodge, or video arcade, or any such thing.
Labels: Gender Issues
Married Readers Only!
You'll just have to read this for yourself, but to pique your interest: Woman gives man "sex every night for a year" 40th birthday present.
It is an honest description and one worth having a discussion over, at least.
I wonder what the equivalent would be for a husband to give a wife? Ladies, any suggestions?
It is an honest description and one worth having a discussion over, at least.
I wonder what the equivalent would be for a husband to give a wife? Ladies, any suggestions?
Labels: Check This Out, Gender Issues
Raising a Real Man in a Metrosexual World
Here's an article my roommate forwarded to me. I'm not sure of the source, so browse the link site at your own risk. But the article itself was pretty squarely recommendable.
I've been thinking about this for a while and this is probably just as good a post as any to start this. My nephew, James Roy Helmka III (currently just "Jimmy"), is the closest thing I have to a son at this point in my life. In many ways (and noticeable to even his parents) he is very much like me. We are pen-pals and I try to encourage him in his schoolwork, etc. Well, there are articles, books, or other interesting things I come across and think about him, whether for him particularly or for his parents on his behalf. As a result I have thought about starting a label called "Jimmy" for all these things.
So this article is really more for Jimmy's mom and dad, but I am creating the label for all things "Jimmy" that I come across that he may either find funny, helpful, or insightful to be a better boy, man, or Christian (and for his parents in his stead).
I've been thinking about this for a while and this is probably just as good a post as any to start this. My nephew, James Roy Helmka III (currently just "Jimmy"), is the closest thing I have to a son at this point in my life. In many ways (and noticeable to even his parents) he is very much like me. We are pen-pals and I try to encourage him in his schoolwork, etc. Well, there are articles, books, or other interesting things I come across and think about him, whether for him particularly or for his parents on his behalf. As a result I have thought about starting a label called "Jimmy" for all these things.
So this article is really more for Jimmy's mom and dad, but I am creating the label for all things "Jimmy" that I come across that he may either find funny, helpful, or insightful to be a better boy, man, or Christian (and for his parents in his stead).
Labels: Gender Issues, Jimmy
Bachelorhood
This was an interesting article. I'm not exactly endorsing its sentiment, nor opposing it. It merely intrigued me as I read it, being a bachelor myself. In part:
"...Dr. Burton was neither the first nor the last to comment that marriage is a hindrance to "all good enterprises.” “Woman inspires us to great things," remarked Alexandre Dumas, "and prevents us from achieving them.” The bitter Friedrich Nietzsche believed marriage (if not women, in general) a distraction from philosophical pursuits. It is a commonplace that most important writers, artists and philosophers have been bachelors, or in the least effectively single in the way Abelard, Franklin, Rousseau, Milton, Thomas Paine and Shakespeare remained. “Certainly the best works, and of greatest merit for the public, have proceeded from the unmarried or childless men,”wrote Sir Francis Bacon (not a bachelor, but perhaps wishing he were). H.L. Mencken, who once suggested bringing back the dollar-a-day bachelor tax (it was worth that much to be single) likewise commented on the superiority of the bachelor only to Mencken it was the bachelor's great intellect and creativity that kept him single, not the other way round. "The bachelor's very capacity to avoid marriage is no more than a proof of his relative freedom from the ordinary sentimentalism of his sex, in other words, of his greater approximation to the clearheadedness of the enemy sex. He is able to defeat the enterprise of women because he brings to the business an equipment almost comparable to their own.” Who can argue that a brief catalog of famous bachelors reads like a roll call of the architects of Western Civilization?:
Pierre Bayle
Robert Boyle
Johannes Brahms
Samuel Butler
Robert Burton
Ludwig van Beethoven
Johannes Brahms
Giacomo Casanova
Frederic Chopin
Nicolaus Copernicus
Eugène Delacrois
Rene Descartes
Gustave Flaubert
Galileo Galilei
Edward Gibbon
Vincent van Gogh
Oliver Goldsmith
Thomas Hobbes
Horace
David Hume
Washington Irving
Henry James
Franz Kafka
Immanuel Kant
Soren Kierkegaard
Charles Lamb
T. E. Lawrence
Meriwether Lewis
Philip Larkin
Gottfried Leibniz
John Locke
Friedrich Nietzsche
Sir Isaac Newton
Blaise Pascal
Alexander Pope
Marcel Proust
Maurice Ravel
George Santayana
Jean Paul Sartre
Franz Schubert
Benedict de Spinoza
Arthur Schopenhauer
Herbert Spencer
Adam Smith
Stendhal
Jonathon Swift
Nikola Tesla
Henry David Thoreau
Henri De Toulouse-Lautrec
Leonardo da Vinci
Voltaire
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Similarly the contributions of the many (ostensibly) celibate medieval monks and theologians (Thomas Aquinas, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, Desiderius Erasmus, Michael Servetus) were essential in dragging Europe out of the dark Age of Faith and paving the way for the Renaissance and the Enlightenment.
...
Vance Packard, in his 1962 book The Pyramid Climbers, noted that, “In general the bachelor is viewed with circumspection, especially if he is not well known to the people appraising him…[However] the worst status of all is that of a bachelor beyond the age of 36. The investigators wonder why he isn’t married. Is it because he isn’t virile? Is he old-maidish? Can’t he get along with people?” By contrast, the married man was the steady one, the stable lot, not least because, in Tallyrand’s memorable phrase, "a married man with a family will do anything for money.”
...
Of the 50 percent of couples that successfully weather the storms of holy matrimony, a mere 38 percent allow that their marriages are happy ones. Yet for all this doom and gloom the happily unmarried man is not opposed to love. Far from it. More likely he idealizes love more than his married counterpart. “Love is an ideal thing, marriage a real thing,” notes Goethe. “A confusion of the real with the ideal never goes unpunished.” Today's relationship gurus warn that marriage must be treated not unlike a job. "When you bring the work strategies that you use in the workplace at home, you can be really successful," says one marriage expert, which brings to mind the words of Robert Burton—that marriage is the last and best cure of romantic love.
And why shouldn’t the bachelor be as cynical as a roomful of reporters? His male friends are forever praising his great fortune. "Is it generally known that bachelors privately receive encouragement and approbation from married men?" asks Ade. Much, however, remains unsaid. The bachelor's married friends seldom speak of their troubles, though their eyes betray a deep-rooted sorrow and a tragic lonesomeness, not least due to an unfilled desire for male companionship. “If you are afraid of loneliness,” warned Chekhov, “don't marry."
...
It was once held that the female—in her dual tasks as mother and wife—played a vital role in tempering the testosterone-fueled excesses of the young male. “Women have always been the carriers of morality and the shapers of the next generation, which seems to me to be far more important than working 60 hours a week in a law firm,” says Robert Bork. Sinclair Lewis, in 1922, drew this memorable portrait of the civilizing influence of women in his novel Babbitt: "Mother corrected Father's vulgarisms by means of a rolling-pin." Sir Francis Bacon maintained that, “wife and children are a kind of discipline of humanity; and single men…are more cruel and hardhearted (good to make severe inquisitors), because their tenderness is not so oft called upon.” And George Gilder likewise notes that "Men need durable ties to women to discipline them for civilized life, or they become a menace to society and themselves… and tend to live short and destructive lives." Well, that depends on the women, I should think. I doubt the ambiguous state of civilization attained by the average coed featured in a typical Girls Gone Wild video has much influence on today's young man, save to make him hot and bothered. Indeed it would not be difficult to make the case that contemporary women are more in need of the good old civilizing influence than are men.
...
Washington Irving was one well acquainted with this sentiment: “With married men their amorous romance is apt to decline after marriage…but with a bachelor, though it may slumber, it never dies. It is always liable to break out again in transient flashes, and never so much as on a spring morning in the country; or on a winter evening, when seated in his solitary chamber, stirring up the fire and talking of matrimony....”
Pierre Bayle
Robert Boyle
Johannes Brahms
Samuel Butler
Robert Burton
Ludwig van Beethoven
Johannes Brahms
Giacomo Casanova
Frederic Chopin
Nicolaus Copernicus
Eugène Delacrois
Rene Descartes
Gustave Flaubert
Galileo Galilei
Edward Gibbon
Vincent van Gogh
Oliver Goldsmith
Thomas Hobbes
Horace
David Hume
Washington Irving
Henry James
Franz Kafka
Immanuel Kant
Soren Kierkegaard
Charles Lamb
T. E. Lawrence
Meriwether Lewis
Philip Larkin
Gottfried Leibniz
John Locke
Friedrich Nietzsche
Sir Isaac Newton
Blaise Pascal
Alexander Pope
Marcel Proust
Maurice Ravel
George Santayana
Jean Paul Sartre
Franz Schubert
Benedict de Spinoza
Arthur Schopenhauer
Herbert Spencer
Adam Smith
Stendhal
Jonathon Swift
Nikola Tesla
Henry David Thoreau
Henri De Toulouse-Lautrec
Leonardo da Vinci
Voltaire
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Similarly the contributions of the many (ostensibly) celibate medieval monks and theologians (Thomas Aquinas, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham, Desiderius Erasmus, Michael Servetus) were essential in dragging Europe out of the dark Age of Faith and paving the way for the Renaissance and the Enlightenment.
...
Vance Packard, in his 1962 book The Pyramid Climbers, noted that, “In general the bachelor is viewed with circumspection, especially if he is not well known to the people appraising him…[However] the worst status of all is that of a bachelor beyond the age of 36. The investigators wonder why he isn’t married. Is it because he isn’t virile? Is he old-maidish? Can’t he get along with people?” By contrast, the married man was the steady one, the stable lot, not least because, in Tallyrand’s memorable phrase, "a married man with a family will do anything for money.”
...
Of the 50 percent of couples that successfully weather the storms of holy matrimony, a mere 38 percent allow that their marriages are happy ones. Yet for all this doom and gloom the happily unmarried man is not opposed to love. Far from it. More likely he idealizes love more than his married counterpart. “Love is an ideal thing, marriage a real thing,” notes Goethe. “A confusion of the real with the ideal never goes unpunished.” Today's relationship gurus warn that marriage must be treated not unlike a job. "When you bring the work strategies that you use in the workplace at home, you can be really successful," says one marriage expert, which brings to mind the words of Robert Burton—that marriage is the last and best cure of romantic love.
And why shouldn’t the bachelor be as cynical as a roomful of reporters? His male friends are forever praising his great fortune. "Is it generally known that bachelors privately receive encouragement and approbation from married men?" asks Ade. Much, however, remains unsaid. The bachelor's married friends seldom speak of their troubles, though their eyes betray a deep-rooted sorrow and a tragic lonesomeness, not least due to an unfilled desire for male companionship. “If you are afraid of loneliness,” warned Chekhov, “don't marry."
...
It was once held that the female—in her dual tasks as mother and wife—played a vital role in tempering the testosterone-fueled excesses of the young male. “Women have always been the carriers of morality and the shapers of the next generation, which seems to me to be far more important than working 60 hours a week in a law firm,” says Robert Bork. Sinclair Lewis, in 1922, drew this memorable portrait of the civilizing influence of women in his novel Babbitt: "Mother corrected Father's vulgarisms by means of a rolling-pin." Sir Francis Bacon maintained that, “wife and children are a kind of discipline of humanity; and single men…are more cruel and hardhearted (good to make severe inquisitors), because their tenderness is not so oft called upon.” And George Gilder likewise notes that "Men need durable ties to women to discipline them for civilized life, or they become a menace to society and themselves… and tend to live short and destructive lives." Well, that depends on the women, I should think. I doubt the ambiguous state of civilization attained by the average coed featured in a typical Girls Gone Wild video has much influence on today's young man, save to make him hot and bothered. Indeed it would not be difficult to make the case that contemporary women are more in need of the good old civilizing influence than are men.
...
Washington Irving was one well acquainted with this sentiment: “With married men their amorous romance is apt to decline after marriage…but with a bachelor, though it may slumber, it never dies. It is always liable to break out again in transient flashes, and never so much as on a spring morning in the country; or on a winter evening, when seated in his solitary chamber, stirring up the fire and talking of matrimony....”
Labels: Gender Issues, Personal
Womanized Men
This seems to be a very popular recurrent theme lately. I came across another article explaining how men are so interested in their own fashion and style that they act more like women. This comment is usually made by a woman and in a condemning tone.
"Looking at the appearance of contemporary young men, one may notice how much their notions of masculinity have changed, how this masculinity is sometimes being replaced by femininity." But, she added to the 400 women and the 10 or so men at the conference: "One cannot help but notice that the world of men has become increasingly effeminate... I don't know if we can see this as our gender's victory."
Labels: Current Events, Gender Issues
"Real Men"
Here is an amazing article titled "Why women are to blame for killing off real men." It is very insightful, although lamentable. Recognizing they're to blame doesn't help the situation now. We may have lost a generation of men/boys to this psychic castration. But there is some sense of being relieved that someone has noticed. Now on with the solution.
Can we let the boys play tag or dodgeball at recess now? Let's start with those "dragons".
Can we let the boys play tag or dodgeball at recess now? Let's start with those "dragons".
Labels: Current Events, Gender Issues, Sophomoric
Man Up!
Here is a phenomenal speech given by an elder professor to some college men (I'm not sure of the complete context). The speech is an excellent admonition to the men to BE MEN! A wonderful manuscript!
Labels: Check This Out, Gender Issues
Boys Without Men
I have had several venues of exposure to this topic lately: one was a podcast by Al Mohler, the other a radio program by Dennis Prager. The consensus is that boys who don't have a positive male influence in their lives either grow up to be effeminate men or "exaggerated" men. There is the womanized male or the male who has never learned to deal responsibly with his testosterone, his strength, or his passion, and therefore overplays them (this can be most noticeable in thuggish behavior).
Ultimately, boys need men. Prager asked the question "When do boys meet men?" There are predominately female teachers, female social workers, and female authority figures throughout their formative years including high school. So when do boys meet men? It would be nice if we could say they meet them in church. But Sunday School teachers, youth leaders, and various other church figures are a majority female (at least the ones a child/youth would interact with).
He even expressed how he felt boys clubs should not let mothers lead or be involved (Den Mothers in the Boy Scouts, for example). In order for a male to learn how to be a man, there has to be a man show him. If a male learns only from a woman, or from another boy, the results are less than admirable.
Mohler referenced a Liberal British Newspaper report on the effects of fatherless males in their country - the results were not pretty. The bottom line is not that boys need a dad, as much as they need older males to grow them into men. Single mothers (as a result of hundreds of reasons) have hard jobs raising boys. And some fathers are negative influences in boys lives. But neither of these issues negate the fact that it takes a male to turn a boy into a man that is healthy and mature.
Christian men: Step up! And not just with your own kids.
Ultimately, boys need men. Prager asked the question "When do boys meet men?" There are predominately female teachers, female social workers, and female authority figures throughout their formative years including high school. So when do boys meet men? It would be nice if we could say they meet them in church. But Sunday School teachers, youth leaders, and various other church figures are a majority female (at least the ones a child/youth would interact with).
He even expressed how he felt boys clubs should not let mothers lead or be involved (Den Mothers in the Boy Scouts, for example). In order for a male to learn how to be a man, there has to be a man show him. If a male learns only from a woman, or from another boy, the results are less than admirable.
Mohler referenced a Liberal British Newspaper report on the effects of fatherless males in their country - the results were not pretty. The bottom line is not that boys need a dad, as much as they need older males to grow them into men. Single mothers (as a result of hundreds of reasons) have hard jobs raising boys. And some fathers are negative influences in boys lives. But neither of these issues negate the fact that it takes a male to turn a boy into a man that is healthy and mature.
Christian men: Step up! And not just with your own kids.
Labels: Children, Commentary, Gender Issues
Gender Identity Confusion?
So California finally HAS fallen off the edge of the US....
Our great Governor just signed a bill banning the words "mother, father, husband, and wife" from all public schools and allows boys to use girl's restrooms and vice versa if they choose. Also the homecoming King doesn't have to be a male, nor does the homecoming queen have to be a female anymore.
Welcome to Wonderland!
Our great Governor just signed a bill banning the words "mother, father, husband, and wife" from all public schools and allows boys to use girl's restrooms and vice versa if they choose. Also the homecoming King doesn't have to be a male, nor does the homecoming queen have to be a female anymore.
Welcome to Wonderland!
Labels: Gender Issues, Politics
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
