I think I'm just going to start a label called "Rabbit Hole" - a reference to Alice in Wonderland, whereby we take a look into another world where everything seems upside down or in someway very foreign to our own. Unfortunately, this phrase is used to indicate a look into the future and seeing our own world.
Well, the latest glimpse down the rabbit hole is a Canadian court case where a 12 year old girl sued her father for grounding her because she used chat sites he had forbidden and posted "inappropriate" pictures of herself on the web. According to the article:
"The girl, whose parents are divorced, then left her dad’s house and moved in with her mother, even though the father has 100% custody. But because she still needed her father to sign the consent form for the field trip, she and her mother convinced a court-appointed lawyer to take the father to court."
The shocking thing is that the mother participated in this (this is apparently why she does NOT have custody), and that a judge actually heard the case and agreed with the child!
I came across an interesting blog tonight: The British Psychological Society Research Digest Blog. There were several articles I found provocative.
Possession is 9/10 of the Law (even for adults):
In one study, trying to determine how 2 year olds determine ownership, they observed that whoever is identified as having the item first is the owner, no matter what. The only exception they could see was if it was explicitly stated the "owner" gave the item as a wrapped gift to the second person. Then the children identified the second person as the owner. The researchers concluded:
"...the most important next step was to find out where young children get this rule about first possession from. They surmised that it could be learned from hearing utterances like ‘‘It’s her doll, she had it first’’, or it could be innate, the product of a "cognitive system dedicated to reasoning about ownership."
Maybe there's something innate that God gave us to bring us back to him when we consider who "owned" us first.
Illustrations and Object Lessons - A Math Lesson for Preachers:
In a study that found practical examples used to teach abstract functions in Math class were more debilitating for students when they were required to perform the same function in a new situation -- simply: "Students taught with the metaphorical aid of water jugs, slices of pizza or tennis balls in a container, were unable to transfer what they'd learned." The study concludes:
"Kaminski's team said that although concrete examples might be more engaging, it seems they may also constrain students' ability to transfer relevant knowledge to a different situation.
The researchers concluded: "If a goal of teaching mathematics is to produce knowledge that students can apply to multiple situations, then presenting mathematical concepts through generic instantiations, such as traditional symbolic notation, may be more effective than a series of 'good examples'.""
The thought that immediately came to my mind is how we attempt to teach children and youth the more ethereal truths of Scripture (i.e. God's being, the Trinity, regeneration, prayer, etc) with our own "slices of pizza and tennis ball" analogies. However, after considering that almost 66% of teens leave the church and their faith after they leave youth group, maybe there is some insight into this study that is relevant for Bible teachers and youth pastors: if we want Disciples of Christ to possess a usable and transferable knowledge of a transcendent God, maybe we shouldn't try so hard to make him "understandable". Sometimes the abstract and the Mystery that is our Creator and Savior is essential to embrace.
...to the new minority in our nation - Fathers! For those who actually stick around to finish the job they started, you should be congratulated today! From a member of a society wrecked by the men who don't, I appreciate you doing your duty! In case you're not aware:
"... The nation's out-of-wedlock birth rate is 38%. Among white children, 28% are now born to a single mother; among Hispanic children it is 50% and reaches a chilling, disorienting peak of 71% for black children. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, nearly a quarter of America's white children (22%) do not have any male in their homes; nearly a third (31%) of Hispanic children and over half of black children (56%) are fatherless...."
Here are some thoughts I don't have time to develop, but at least wanted to document in seminal form. If you wish to inquire, I will elaborate.
Every child in every generation in every family has been faced with the same decision as Adam and Eve in the Garden: will you trust your parents and depend on them for your moral compass, or will you instead attempt to secure the knowledge of good and evil from your own personal experiences. Sadly, every child chooses the same as Adam and Eve, and consequently, seeing their own nakedness and feeling their own shame. The best hope of parents is to delay this "crossing" for as long as possible to where the consequences of a child's actions are the most comprehensible and the least durable.
_____
There are words, and generally they are large words, whose meanings are difficult to explain but critical to grasp for everyone who desires to live well. Some of these words are:
Appropriate Credibility Mature Discretion
To learn to speak with discretion, maintain one's credibility, to behave appropriately, and to handle defeat or disappointment in a mature way, for example, should be the goal and hope of all men and women of character.
_____
Quotable Prager Lines (food for thought):
When a child asks, "Why? Don't you trust me?", the best response is, "I don't trust human nature." The heart of the Torah is based on the command to love the stranger. The other sex is the ultimate stranger. As a man, I have more in common with a tribesman from a remote people with whom I cannot speak because he is a male than I do with my own wife. Society should be focused on determining what is good for the whole. In light of the recent judicial activism, I wonder "how far will society bend for the individual?"
Here's an amazing feel-good story.
Chuck Colson's commentary today was on the movie The Golden Compass. Below is an excerpt from his statements that have a broader impact regarding media/education in general.
"The somewhat simplistic message [from the movie] that emerges is, “Question authority.” But as the Ignatius Press blog points out, it comes across more like “Question authority. Just not our authority.” That is, we are supposed to accept the film’s assertions about what religion is like as, well, the gospel.
But it is just a story, isn’t it? Of course, it is. But as Philip Pullman himself once wrote, “‘Thou shalt not’ might reach the head, but it takes ‘Once upon a time’ to reach the heart.” That is exactly the point made in the new book THE PIED PIPER OF ATHEISM, which draws the connection between Pullman’s fantasy tales and the legendary figure who stole children away by playing music that appealed to their emotions.
No matter what the filmmakers meant to do, Pullman certainly intended to capture children’s hearts and plant the seed of doubt there. And the film, watered-down as it may be, cannot help but reflect that...."
I have had several venues of exposure to this topic lately: one was a podcast by Al Mohler, the other a radio program by Dennis Prager. The consensus is that boys who don't have a positive male influence in their lives either grow up to be effeminate men or "exaggerated" men. There is the womanized male or the male who has never learned to deal responsibly with his testosterone, his strength, or his passion, and therefore overplays them (this can be most noticeable in thuggish behavior).
Ultimately, boys need men. Prager asked the question "When do boys meet men?" There are predominately female teachers, female social workers, and female authority figures throughout their formative years including high school. So when do boys meet men? It would be nice if we could say they meet them in church. But Sunday School teachers, youth leaders, and various other church figures are a majority female (at least the ones a child/youth would interact with).
He even expressed how he felt boys clubs should not let mothers lead or be involved (Den Mothers in the Boy Scouts, for example). In order for a male to learn how to be a man, there has to be a man show him. If a male learns only from a woman, or from another boy, the results are less than admirable.
Mohler referenced a Liberal British Newspaper report on the effects of fatherless males in their country - the results were not pretty. The bottom line is not that boys need a dad, as much as they need older males to grow them into men. Single mothers (as a result of hundreds of reasons) have hard jobs raising boys. And some fathers are negative influences in boys lives. But neither of these issues negate the fact that it takes a male to turn a boy into a man that is healthy and mature.
Christian men: Step up! And not just with your own kids.
Amazing! I wonder if Dad helped at all.
Graham has an excellent post about reading to children, and an even better book recommendation that gives those willing to listen a great starting point!
From the author of Honey for a Child's Heart, Gladys Hunt:
"Every child ought to know the pleasure of words so well chosen that they awaken sensibility, great emotions, and understanding of truth."
Rowdy AMEN! And somewhat connected to this theme, I watched a wonderful movie last night that I would highly recommend: Nicholas Nickelby, based on the novel by Charles Dickens. I know it's rare, but this movie made me want to read the book. I am certain that there was so much missing compared to the full content in the novel. It was a great story about friendship, family, and integrity.