Ph: 36159673
skip to main | skip to sidebar
Showing posts with label Children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Children. Show all posts

American Youth

I am doing some research about the American Flag and came across this letter. O, how I wish this could be said with certainty today.

Letter from a Navy Pilot -
Battle of Midway


Anonymous


The Fates have been kind to me. When you hear people saying harsh things about American youth, you will know how wrong they all are. So many times that now they have become commonplace, I've seen incidents that make me know that we were never soft, never weak.

Many of my friends are now dead. To a man, each died with a nonchalance that each would have denied was courage, but simply called a lack of fear and forgot the triumph. If anything great or good has been born of this war, it should be valued in the youth of our country, who were never trained for war, who almost never believed in war, but who have, from some hidden source, brought forth a gallantry which is homespun, it is so real.

Out here between the spaceless sea and sky, American youth has found itself, and given of itself, so that a spark may catch, burst into flame, and burn high. If our country takes these sacrifices with indifference it will be the cruelest ingratitude the world has ever known.

You will, I know, do all in your power to help others keep the faith. My luck can't last much longer. But the flame goes on and only that is important.

A Child-Centered World

Here is a brilliant article by Joseph Epstein called "The Kindergarchy" from The Weekly Standard from 06/09/08. He basically takes on the idea of how our society has moved from "children are to be seen and not heard" to the child-centric world most adults have chosen, or are required, to live in. From the article:
"...Children have gone from background to foreground figures in domestic life, with more and more attention centered on them, their upbringing, their small accomplishments, their right relationship with parents and grandparents. For the past 30 years at least, we have been lavishing vast expense and anxiety on our children in ways that are unprecedented in American and in perhaps any other national life. Such has been the weight of all this concern about children that it has exercised a subtle but pervasive tyranny of its own. This is what I call Kindergarchy: dreary, boring, sadly misguided Kindergarchy.
...

I don't recall many stretches of boredom in my boyhood. Life was lived among friends on the block and, later, during games on the playground. Winter afternoons after school were filled up by "Jack Armstrong," "Captain Midnight," and other radio programs for kids. Boredom, really, wasn't an option. I recall only once telling my mother that I was bored. "Oh," she said, a furtive smile on her lips, "why don't you bang your head against the wall. That'll take your mind off your boredom." I never mentioned boredom again.
...

I don't for a moment mean to suggest that such an upbringing produced a superior generation of adults. What it produced was another group of people who later spent their lives going about the world's business, with no strong grudges against their parents or anger at such abstract enemies as The System. All I would claim is that to be free from so much parental supervision seemed a nice way to grow up, and it surely resulted in a lot less wear and tear on everyone all round.
...

Suddenly parents wanted their children to think of them as, if not exactly contemporaries, then as friends, pals, fun people. Parents of my own parents' generation may have been more or less kind, generous, humorous, warm, but, however attractive, they never thought of themselves as their children's friends. When your son becomes a man (or your daughter a woman), make him (or her) your brother (or sister), an old Arab proverb has it. But it's probably a serious mistake to make a kid of 9 or 14 your brother or sister. Childrearing became a highly self-conscious activity, in all of its facets.
...

On visits to the homes of friends with small children, one finds their toys strewn everywhere, their drawings on the refrigerator, television sets turned to their shows. Parents in this context seem less than secondary, little more than indentured servants. Under the Kindergarchy, all arrangements are centered on children: their schooling, their lessons, their predilections, their care and feeding and general high maintenance--children are the name of the game.

No other generations of kids have been so curried and cultivated, so pampered and primed, though primed for what exactly is a bit unclear. Children are given a voice in lots of decisions formerly not up for their consideration.
...

How did earlier generations of parents seem able to manage raising children while putting in so much less time, avoiding so much Sturm und Drang? People raising children today will tell you that the world is a more frightening place now than it was 50 years ago. Much more crime out there, drugs are easily obtained, sex offenders are everywhere, lots of children turn up missing, as the back of your milk cartons will inform you. The spirit of therapy having triumphed, we now see more clearly than heretofore how fragile the young human personality is, how easily it can be smashed by mistreatment or mismanagement or want of affection. Add to all this that the options for children are much greater today; a child can go in any number of ways in education and in life, and all these need to be thoroughly investigated.
...

So often in my literature classes students told me what they "felt" about a novel, or a particular character in a novel. I tried, ever so gently, to tell them that no one cared what they felt; the trick was to discover not one's feelings but what the author had put into the book, its moral weight and its resultant power. In essay courses, many of these same students turned in papers upon which I wished to--but did not--write: "D-, Too much love in the home." I knew where they came by their sense of their own deep significance and that this sense was utterly false to any conceivable reality. Despite what their parents had been telling them from the very outset of their lives, they were not significant. Significance has to be earned, and it is earned only through achievement. Besides, one of the first things that people who really are significant seem to know is that, in the grander scheme, they are themselves really quite insignificant.
...

The consequences of so many years of endlessly attentive childrearing in young people can also be witnessed in many among them who act as if certain that they are deserving of the interest of the rest of us; they come off as very knowing. Lots of their conversation turns out to be chiefly about themselves, and much of it feels as if it is formulated to impress some dean of admissions with how very extraordinary they are. Despite all the effort that has been put into shaping these kids, things, somehow, don't seem quite to have worked out. Who would have thought that so much love in the home would result in such far from lovable children? But then, come to think of it, apart from their parents, who would have thought otherwise?"

12 Year-Old Sues Father Over Grounding

I think I'm just going to start a label called "Rabbit Hole" - a reference to Alice in Wonderland, whereby we take a look into another world where everything seems upside down or in someway very foreign to our own. Unfortunately, this phrase is used to indicate a look into the future and seeing our own world.

Well, the latest glimpse down the rabbit hole is a Canadian court case where a 12 year old girl sued her father for grounding her because she used chat sites he had forbidden and posted "inappropriate" pictures of herself on the web. According to the article:
"The girl, whose parents are divorced, then left her dad’s house and moved in with her mother, even though the father has 100% custody. But because she still needed her father to sign the consent form for the field trip, she and her mother convinced a court-appointed lawyer to take the father to court."
The shocking thing is that the mother participated in this (this is apparently why she does NOT have custody), and that a judge actually heard the case and agreed with the child!

New Poll: Chidren Don't Want Health Care!

Breaking News! This should put a new wrinkle in the Dems socialist agenda.

Study: Most Children Strongly Opposed To Children’s Healthcare

British Psychology Society

I came across an interesting blog tonight: The British Psychological Society Research Digest Blog. There were several articles I found provocative.

Possession is 9/10 of the Law (even for adults):
In one study, trying to determine how 2 year olds determine ownership, they observed that whoever is identified as having the item first is the owner, no matter what. The only exception they could see was if it was explicitly stated the "owner" gave the item as a wrapped gift to the second person. Then the children identified the second person as the owner. The researchers concluded:
"...the most important next step was to find out where young children get this rule about first possession from. They surmised that it could be learned from hearing utterances like ‘‘It’s her doll, she had it first’’, or it could be innate, the product of a "cognitive system dedicated to reasoning about ownership."

Maybe there's something innate that God gave us to bring us back to him when we consider who "owned" us first.

Illustrations and Object Lessons - A Math Lesson for Preachers:
In a study that found practical examples used to teach abstract functions in Math class were more debilitating for students when they were required to perform the same function in a new situation -- simply: "Students taught with the metaphorical aid of water jugs, slices of pizza or tennis balls in a container, were unable to transfer what they'd learned." The study concludes:
"Kaminski's team said that although concrete examples might be more engaging, it seems they may also constrain students' ability to transfer relevant knowledge to a different situation.

The researchers concluded: "If a goal of teaching mathematics is to produce knowledge that students can apply to multiple situations, then presenting mathematical concepts through generic instantiations, such as traditional symbolic notation, may be more effective than a series of 'good examples'.""
The thought that immediately came to my mind is how we attempt to teach children and youth the more ethereal truths of Scripture (i.e. God's being, the Trinity, regeneration, prayer, etc) with our own "slices of pizza and tennis ball" analogies. However, after considering that almost 66% of teens leave the church and their faith after they leave youth group, maybe there is some insight into this study that is relevant for Bible teachers and youth pastors: if we want Disciples of Christ to possess a usable and transferable knowledge of a transcendent God, maybe we shouldn't try so hard to make him "understandable". Sometimes the abstract and the Mystery that is our Creator and Savior is essential to embrace.

Happy Father's Day...

...to the new minority in our nation - Fathers! For those who actually stick around to finish the job they started, you should be congratulated today! From a member of a society wrecked by the men who don't, I appreciate you doing your duty! In case you're not aware:

"... The nation's out-of-wedlock birth rate is 38%. Among white children, 28% are now born to a single mother; among Hispanic children it is 50% and reaches a chilling, disorienting peak of 71% for black children. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, nearly a quarter of America's white children (22%) do not have any male in their homes; nearly a third (31%) of Hispanic children and over half of black children (56%) are fatherless...."

E-MASQL8

Here's a great post about a very funny ad:

Random Thoughts

Here are some thoughts I don't have time to develop, but at least wanted to document in seminal form. If you wish to inquire, I will elaborate.

Every child in every generation in every family has been faced with the same decision as Adam and Eve in the Garden: will you trust your parents and depend on them for your moral compass, or will you instead attempt to secure the knowledge of good and evil from your own personal experiences. Sadly, every child chooses the same as Adam and Eve, and consequently, seeing their own nakedness and feeling their own shame. The best hope of parents is to delay this "crossing" for as long as possible to where the consequences of a child's actions are the most comprehensible and the least durable.
_____

There are words, and generally they are large words, whose meanings are difficult to explain but critical to grasp for everyone who desires to live well. Some of these words are:
Appropriate Credibility Mature Discretion
To learn to speak with discretion, maintain one's credibility, to behave appropriately, and to handle defeat or disappointment in a mature way, for example, should be the goal and hope of all men and women of character.
_____

Quotable Prager Lines (food for thought):
When a child asks, "Why? Don't you trust me?", the best response is, "I don't trust human nature." The heart of the Torah is based on the command to love the stranger. The other sex is the ultimate stranger. As a man, I have more in common with a tribesman from a remote people with whom I cannot speak because he is a male than I do with my own wife. Society should be focused on determining what is good for the whole. In light of the recent judicial activism, I wonder "how far will society bend for the individual?"

The U.N. Strikes Again

"That's right. The U.N. organization charged with protecting children world wide is "partnering" with an organization not only designated by the U.S. as a terrorist organization, but designated by the U.N. itself! Unfortunately, anyone moderately familiar with the U.N.'s history should be unsurprised."
It's not surprising, but it is shocking. Aren't they ever going to figure this whole "ethics/human rights/world peace" thing out?

Baby Girl Born Twice

Here's an amazing feel-good story.

Girl speaking to the UN

This makes me sad. It actually sounds like something Obama would say (and I'm not trying to be condescending). It's as if there were no adults in this girls life to help her understand the complex nature of our world, only "If it worked in Kindergarten, it should work at the UN!" No wonder so many young people are disillusioned with adults and those in positions of power and authority. If they are never spoken to in a serious way about difficult things, they grow up to believe "all the money spent on wars should be used to buy poor kids food", and then the world would be a better place. It is naive. I can't blame the girl, but I do blame the adults who should know better.
This page contained an embedded video. Click here to view it.

"Punished with a Baby"? - Obama

Here's a great article over at Hot Air that discusses Obama's comments that he doesn't want a teenager to be punished with a baby for having sex. Worth reading for sure.

Obama and Babies

Here is a great letter written by Sherif Girgis specifically related to Obama's consistent stand against the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act (the bill that would allow babies who survive an abortion to live - Obama's position is that they must be killed, even if they are separated from the mother!)

In case you need the history, here is the post from Between Two Worlds:
Here is a quick rundown, based on some research by Jill Stanek:

IL Senate 2001
Senate Bill 1095, Born Alive Infant Protection Act Voted "no" in the Senate Judiciary Committee (March 28, 2001) Argued against the bill on the IL Senate floor (March 30, 2001) (see pp. 84-90 of this PDF) Voted "present" for the bill (March 30, 2001)

IL Senate 2002
Senate Bill 1662, Born Alive Infant Protection Act Voted "no" vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee (March 6, 2002) Argued against the bill on the IL Senate floor (April 4, 2002) (see pp. 28-35 of this PDF) Voted "no" for the bill (April 4, 2002)

IL Senate 2003
Senate Bill 1082, Born Alive Infant Protection Act Obama, who chaired the Health and Human Services Committee, held the bill from receiving a committee vote and stopped the senator sponsor from adding the federal act's clarification paragraph, which made the bills absolutely identical.
Ms. Stanek also has a blog post running through the top 10 reasons that Obama has given for opposing the Born Alive Infant Protection Act.

BTW's Update: Just saw Jeremy Pierce's post from a couple of weeks ago, looking in more depth at Obama's argument.

Parenting 101

I dont' usually browse around on WebMD, but had to visit the site to look up some info recently, and came across a great article on commonsense parenting. As a child welfare worker for several years, it amazed me the level of parenting I witnessed, and the degree of oblivion many of the parents possessed as to why their kids behaved like they did.

There are some great resources out there today, including the mildly entertaining TV show Nanny 911. If I had to offer any advice from my various personal experiences working with kids from all age groups, it could be summarized as: "Learn to say 'no' and mean it!" This one thing would mitigate a majority of parent-child conflict as I understand them. I once heard a well-qualified, and well-respected social worker state: "Children need two things to grow up healthy: Love and Structure. If you have to sacrifice one, give them structure." I could not agree more.

Well, in order to avoid the Top 10 Parenting Pitfalls, here is some basic advice (Check out the whole article for more practical scenarios and advice):

No matter the scenario, here are tips for dealing with parenting pitfalls:

Mean business. "Speak to your child like you mean business, and send clear messages when you're communicating with your kids," says Donahue.

Stick to your guns. "The toughest thing is to have endurance," says Donahue. "Stick to your guns, even when the kids are whining and pushing your buttons. Kids know that if we have a history of not sticking to what we say, they're going to push and push. Have the endurance and the strength and the energy to keep up with them."

Plan ahead. "Parents have to do a better job of helping kids to anticipate the behavior that is expected of them beforehand," Donahue tells WebMD. "When you're in the middle of a situation, you're busy and rushing and don't think about it, and then things can get out of control."

Take care of yourself. "Sleep more, exercise, and take care of yourself," says Donahue. "Parenting is extremely exhausting work."

Once Upon A Time...

Chuck Colson's commentary today was on the movie The Golden Compass. Below is an excerpt from his statements that have a broader impact regarding media/education in general.
"The somewhat simplistic message [from the movie] that emerges is, “Question authority.” But as the Ignatius Press blog points out, it comes across more like “Question authority. Just not our authority.” That is, we are supposed to accept the film’s assertions about what religion is like as, well, the gospel.

But it is just a story, isn’t it? Of course, it is. But as Philip Pullman himself once wrote, “‘Thou shalt not’ might reach the head, but it takes ‘Once upon a time’ to reach the heart.” That is exactly the point made in the new book THE PIED PIPER OF ATHEISM, which draws the connection between Pullman’s fantasy tales and the legendary figure who stole children away by playing music that appealed to their emotions.

No matter what the filmmakers meant to do, Pullman certainly intended to capture children’s hearts and plant the seed of doubt there. And the film, watered-down as it may be, cannot help but reflect that...."

The True Meaning of Christmas

This brought a lump to my throat and tears to my eyes! Seriously! After my last post about Christmas, I was so delighted to see this on Between Two Worlds. Thank you for the reminder and the powerful truth presented to the world every year in a cartoon! How amazing that the MSM actually puts this on. Unfortunately, just like most Christians, most Americans probably don't get the weight of it. Remember, if we aren't careful we will dismember the gospel by how we celebrate this holiday. Thanks Charlie Brown for helping us "remember" it correctly! Peace on Earth! Goodwill to Men! Joy to the World, a Savior has come! He is Christ the Lord!

One Laptop Per Child

It's finally here! If you buy one (for $399) they will donate one to a third-world child. The laptop looks like it has everything I would need. Check out the site and maybe you could buy one for the family as a Christmas present and connect your children to a third-world kid. Fascinating. But they stop this offer by Nov 26th!

Boys Without Men

I have had several venues of exposure to this topic lately: one was a podcast by Al Mohler, the other a radio program by Dennis Prager. The consensus is that boys who don't have a positive male influence in their lives either grow up to be effeminate men or "exaggerated" men. There is the womanized male or the male who has never learned to deal responsibly with his testosterone, his strength, or his passion, and therefore overplays them (this can be most noticeable in thuggish behavior).

Ultimately, boys need men. Prager asked the question "When do boys meet men?" There are predominately female teachers, female social workers, and female authority figures throughout their formative years including high school. So when do boys meet men? It would be nice if we could say they meet them in church. But Sunday School teachers, youth leaders, and various other church figures are a majority female (at least the ones a child/youth would interact with).

He even expressed how he felt boys clubs should not let mothers lead or be involved (Den Mothers in the Boy Scouts, for example). In order for a male to learn how to be a man, there has to be a man show him. If a male learns only from a woman, or from another boy, the results are less than admirable.

Mohler referenced a Liberal British Newspaper report on the effects of fatherless males in their country - the results were not pretty. The bottom line is not that boys need a dad, as much as they need older males to grow them into men. Single mothers (as a result of hundreds of reasons) have hard jobs raising boys. And some fathers are negative influences in boys lives. But neither of these issues negate the fact that it takes a male to turn a boy into a man that is healthy and mature.

Christian men: Step up! And not just with your own kids.

Wedgie-Proof Underwear

Amazing! I wonder if Dad helped at all.

Reading to Children

Graham has an excellent post about reading to children, and an even better book recommendation that gives those willing to listen a great starting point!

From the author of Honey for a Child's Heart, Gladys Hunt:
"Every child ought to know the pleasure of words so well chosen that they awaken sensibility, great emotions, and understanding of truth."

Rowdy AMEN! And somewhat connected to this theme, I watched a wonderful movie last night that I would highly recommend:
Nicholas Nickelby, based on the novel by Charles Dickens. I know it's rare, but this movie made me want to read the book. I am certain that there was so much missing compared to the full content in the novel. It was a great story about friendship, family, and integrity.
 


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser