09 October 2008
President Al Gore
01 October 2008
Colbert Report: The Market is God
30 September 2008
New Book from Eugene Peterson
Tell It Slant explores how Jesus used language — he was earthy, not abstract; metaphorical, not dogmatic. His was not a direct language of information or instruction but an indirect, oblique language requiring a participating imagination — “slant” language. In order to witness and teach accurately in Jesus’ name, then, it is important for us to use language the way he did.
Part 1 focuses on Jesus’ words in everyday contexts — his teachings to the crowds, the stories he told, his conversations with his disciples. Part 2 shifts the focus to Jesus’ prayers — the words he spoke to God the Father.
Peterson’s Tell It Slant promises to deepen our understanding of Jesus’ words, strengthen our awareness of language as a gift of God, and nurture our efforts to make all of our speech convey a blessing to others.
The Future of Christian Education
Peter Berger makes a provocative prediction: “If Christianity has a future it will be in the resurgence of Christian experience and faith in the lives of people who have never read a theological book.”
If Berger is right, than the way we approach Christian education must have a new shape. It will not do to simply hand people a study book or rehash what “experts” have said. Christian education must be lively and experiential. It must provoke wonder and stimulate curiosity.
Therefore, here are two things I believe about Christian education:
I believe Christian education must be interesting. Christian formation must connect with the practical concerns of daily life.
I believe Christian education must nurture holiness. The goal is living in ways that resemble the God whom we study.
What do you believe?
19 September 2008
Pagan Pentecostals and unchristian Christians
- Edward Schillebeeckx, World and Church (1971).
If God were Inarticulate
“Although Dewey's book [Experience and Nature] is incredibly ill written, it seemed to me after several rereadings to have a feeling of intimacy with the inside of the cosmos that I found unequaled. So methought God would have spoken had He been inarticulate but keenly desirous to tell you how it was.”
- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Holmes-Pollock Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock 1874-1932, Vol. 2 (1942).
09 September 2008
Impotent Power
Schillebeeckx and his Crazy Readers
“I get a few letters, but only a few, from people who damn me as the incarnation of pride, as Satan personified – the false teacher who wants to destroy the Church but is too much of a coward to leave it. It amazes me how strict orthodoxy so often leads to an unloving an unChristian attitude.”
(From God is New Each Moment)
04 September 2008
Cornel West on Obama
27 August 2008
Am I Evangelical?
The word “evangelical” is the most confusing word in theology today. Based on most definitions, I would not say that I am an evangelical, because those definitions point to a fastidious set of ideas about the Bible, politics, and morality.
Here, however, is an attempt at a more appropriate definition of “evangelical” – one that I would be happy to live with.
“Evangelical” is not a noun, it is an adjective. It indicates an attitude, a disposition, towards something. Unfortunately, evangelical is often taken to mean a disposition towards the Bible; a zeal for a particularly narrow hermeneutics.
But “evangelical” should indicate a disposition shaped by Jesus. “Evangelical” is a Gospel word. It comes from euangelion. It is a good word about the good news. And that news is about a cross and a tomb – not a book.
“Evangelical” is not an identity. In fact, a claim “be evangelical” is a claim to find your identity in something other than Evangelicalism – to find identity in Jesus. “Evangelical” is word that points away from itself and towards Christ.