Realized i kept missing the
29 May 2009 2:52pm GMT Realized i kept missing the f in the 'rdf' string....ops. Thanks for this
new to sparql
8 Apr 2009 5:39am GMT I am familiar with stand sql, i am looking at the syntax for SPARQL and it seems more flexible. Looks like you have more powerful expressions for filtering. Nice
Describing (finding) subjects which don't have a particular predicate in SPARQL
7 Apr 2009 9:37am GMT If you want to do something like a SQL NOT in SPARQL, here's what the query looks like: PREFIX rs: <http://schemas.talis.com/2006/recordstore/schema#> PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> DESCRIBE ?tenancy { ?tenancy rdf:type rs:Tenancy . OPTIONAL { ?tenancy rs:platformStoreUri ?o } . FILTER ( !bound(?o) ) } Here I'm looking for subjects with rdf type of http://schemas.talis.com/2006/recordstore/schema#Tenancy, which don't have a...